Commitment to non-commitment: The role of a foundation in configuring a cross-sector collaborative space

  • Jonathan Schmidt
Nøgleord: Cross-sector collaboration, Innovation policy, BLOXHUB, Urban development


Cross-sector collaborative spaces have been suggested to provide a way of organising collaboration between the public, private, and third sector to address so-called grand challenges. However, due to the complexity and uncertainty of grand challenges, establishing collaborative spaces is associated with considerable risks. Innovation policy scholars disagree whether public or third sector organisations are better suited to take these risks. Based on the case of Copenhagen-based BLOXHUB, this paper investigates the role of a third sector organisation in interweaving actors across sectors to configure a collaborative space in the field of sustainable urban development.


Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 32(4), pp.1265–1281.

Anheier, H. and Daly, S. (2007). The Politics of Foundations: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.

Ansari, S. (Shaz), Wijen, F. and Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a Climate Change Logic: An Institutional Perspective on the “Tragedy of the Commons”. Organization Science, vol. 24(4), pp.1014–1040.

Benner, T. (2018). Realdania: Vi havde ikke bygget Blox i dag. [online] Politiken. Available at: [Accessed 01.09.2018]

BLOX (2018). Vision for BLOX. [online] BLOX. Available at: [Accessed 20.03.2018].

BLOXHUB General Meeting (2016). Articles of association for The BLOXHUB Association. Available at: http://cdn content/ uploads/2017/01/Vedt%C3%A6gter pa%CC%8A engelsk_FINAL ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION_24052016.pdf [Accessed 21.02. 2018].

Borrás, S. and Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80(8), pp.1513–1522.

Callon, M. (1998). An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology. The Sociological Review, vol. 46, pp.244–269.

Eccles, R.G. and Nohria, N. (1992). Beyond the hype: Rediscovering the essence of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50(1), pp.25–32.

Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E. and Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods: Rigor without Rigor Mortis. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 59(4), pp.1113–1123.

Erhardtsen, B. (2013). Realdania med ny aktivistisk strategi. [online] Berlingske Business. Available at: [Accessed 09.08. 2018].

Erhvervsministeriet (2013). Danmark i arbejde. Vækstplan for kreative [online] Regeringen. Available at: [Accessed 09.10.2018]

Ferraro, F., Etzion, D. and Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited. Organization Studies, vol. 36(3), pp.363–390.

Financial Stability Board (2018). Addressing SIFIs. [online] Available at: [Accessed 09.10. 2018].

Finansministeriet (2017). Finanslov for finansåret 2017, § 8. Erhvervs- og Vækstministeriet. [online] Finansministeriet. Available at: /publikationer/2017/finanslov-for-2017 [Accessed 03.09.2018].

Habermann, U. (2007). Denmark. In: H. Anheier and S. Daly, eds., The Politics of Foundations: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.130–143.

Husted, E. and Plesner, U. (2017). Spaces of open-source politics: Physical and digital conditions for political organization. Organization, vol. 24(5), pp.648–670.

Karvonen, A. and van Heur, B. (2014). Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities: Introduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 38(2), pp.379–392.

Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.

Kuhlmann, S. and Rip, A. (2018). Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges. Science and Public Policy. Available at: DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy011 [Accessed 22.03.2018]

Le Pluart, J. (2016). Secret Innovation Lab Revealed. [online] IKEA. Available at: [Accessed 27 Feb. 2018].

Leifer, E.M. (1991). Actors as observers: a theory of skill in social relationships. New York, NY: Garland.

Leijten, J., Butter, M., Kohl, J., Leis, M. and Gehrt, D. (2012). Investing in Research and Innovation for Grand Challenges. Brussels, Belgium: Joint Institute for Innovation Policy.

Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K. and Feldman, M.S. (2008). Perspective—Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science, vol. 19(6), pp.907–918.

Mair, J. and Hehenberger, L. (2013). Front-Stage and Backstage Convening: The Transition from Opposition to Mutualistic Coexistence in Organizational Philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 57(4), pp.1174–1200.

Mantere, S. and Ketokivi, M., 2013. Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, vol. 38(1), pp.70–89.

Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem Press: London.

Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union: A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. [online] Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Available at: [Accessed 09.08. 2018].

Padgett, J.F. and Powell, W.W. (2012). The problem of emergence. The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton, NJ & Oxford, England: Princeton University Press, pp.1–29.

Powell, W.W. and Steinberg, R. eds. (2006). The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Prewitt, K., 2006. Foundations. In: W.W. Powell and R. Steinberg, eds., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. Yale University Press, pp.355–377.

Puttick, R., Baeck, P. and Colligan, P. (2014). i-teams. The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. [online] London, England: Nesta and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Available at: https://www.nesta. [Accessed 17.02.2018].

Realdania (2018a). BLOXHUB - Danmarks nye base for fremtidens byløsninger. [online] Realdania. Available at: [Accessed 20 Mar. 2018].

Realdania (2018b). Realdania. [online] Available at: [Accessed 28.08.2018].

Rip, A. and Joly, P.-B. (2012). Emerging spaces and governance. A position paper for EU-SPRI. [online] Available at: emerging_spaces_and_governance.pdf. [Accessed 22.02.2018]

Schot, J. and Steinmueller, E. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change: Innovation policy 3.0. Brighton, England: SPRU Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

Schuyt, T.N.M. (2010). Philanthropy in European welfare states: a challenging promise? International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 76(4), pp.774–789.

Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations. In: W.W. Powell and R. Steinberg, eds., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.117–139.

Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R. and Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, vol. 19(10), pp.1455–1479.

United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. [online] Available at: [Accessed 19.07.2017]

Schmidt, J. (2018). Commitment to non-commitment: The role of a foundation in configuring a cross-sector collaborative space. Politik, 21(2).