Arkitektur og politik: Atmosfæriske refleksioner ud fra Böhme og Sloterdijk

  • Lydia Jørgensen
  • Christian Borch
Nøgleord: Arkitektur, Politik, Böhme, Sloterdijk, Politisk styringsredskab

Resumé

The notion of atmosphere occupies an increasingly central role in present-day discussions of design, affect, architecture and sensory environments. It is mobilized in particular to emphasize and shed light on a pre-subjective, embodied apprehension of spatially discharged moods. This article especially focuses on how the notion of atmosphere offers new ways of understanding the relations between architecture and politics. Specifically, we explore such relations via the philosophical reflections on atmosphere as found in Gernot Böhme’s and Peter Sloterdijk’s work. We suggest that, in spite of significant difference between Böhme and Sloterdijk, they each offers important insights into how architecture and politics are entangled. After a brief outline of each of their general atmospheric projects, we demonstrate the different critical potential their analyses of architecture and the politics of space entail.

Referencer

Albertsen, N. (2013). Atmosfærernes by. I: B. Schiermer (red.). Fænomenologi - teorier og metoder. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, s. 215–242.

Biehl-Missal, B. og Saren, M. (2012). Atmospheres of Seduction. Journal of Macromar-keting, årg. 32(2), s. 168–180.

Boltanski, L., og Chiapello, È. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London og New York: Verso.

Borch, C. (2008). Foam architecture: managing co-isolated associations. Economy and Society, årg. 37(4), s. 548-571.

Borch, C. (2010). Organizational Atmospheres: Foam, Affect and Architecture. Organi-zation, årg. 17(2), s. 223-241.

Borch, C. (2015). Foucault, Crime and Power: Problematisations of Crime in the Twen-tieth Century. London og New York: Routledge.

Borch, C. (2016). Peter Sloterdijk. I: B. Schiermer (red.). Kulturteori og kultursociologi. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, s. 365-82.

Böhme, G. (2016). Ästhetischer Kapitalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Böhme, G. (2013). Architektur und Atmosphäre. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Böhme, G. (2008) Invasive Technisierung. Zug: Graue Edition.

Böhme, G. (1995). Atmosphäre. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Chandler, T. (2011). Reading Atmospheres: The Ecocritical Potential of Gernot Bohme’s Aesthetic Theory of Nature. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environ-ment, årg. 18(3), s. 553–568.

Corbusier, L. (1986). Towards a New Architecture. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.

Delanty, G. & Jones, P. R. (2002). European Identity and Architecture. European Journal of Social Theory, årg. 5(4), s. 453-66.

Funcke, B. (2005). Against Gravity: Bettina Funcke Talks With Peter Sloterdijk. Bookfo-rum Feb/Mar. Tilgængelig på: https://www.bookforum.com/archive/feb_05/funcke.html

Gehl, J. (2017). Livet mellem husene. 7. udg. København: Arkitektens Forlag.

Habermas, J. (1985). Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Hasse, J. (2014). Atmospheres as expression of medial power. Understanding atmospheres in urban governance and under self-guidance. Lebenswelt. Aesthetics and philosophy of experience, årg. (4), s. 214–229.

Heibach, C. (2012). Atmosphären. München: Wilhelm Fink.

Husted, E. (2017). There is always an alternative: A study of control and commitment in political organization.

Frederiksberg: The Doctoral School of Organisation and Management Studies.

Julmi, C. (2017). The Concept of Atmosphere in Management and Organization Studies. Organizational Aesthetics, årg. 6(1), s. 4–30.

Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of Affect. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Pallasmaa, J. (2013). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. 3. udg. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Ranciére, J. (2009). The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.

Sloterdijk, P. (1988). Critique of Cynical Reason. London and New York: Verso.

Sloterdijk, P. (1998). Sphären I. Blasen: Mikrosphärologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Sloterdijk, P. (1999). Sphären II. Globen: Makrosphärologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Sloterdijk, P. (2004). Sphären III. Schäume: Plurale Sphärologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Sloterdijk, P. (2014a). Der ästhetische Imperativ. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Sloterdijk, P. (2014b). Du musst dein Leben ändern. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, årg. 86(1), s. 57–78.

Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory: Space, politics, affect. London og New York: Routledge.

van Tuinen, S. (2007). Peter Sloterdijk: Ein Profil. 2. udg. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

Wilson, J. Q. & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken Windows. The Atlantic Monthly, March, s. 29-38.

Zumthor, P. (2005). Atmospheres. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Publiceret
2018-12-10
Citation/Eksport
Jørgensen, L., & Borch, C. (2018). Arkitektur og politik: Atmosfæriske refleksioner ud fra Böhme og Sloterdijk. Politik, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v21i2.111409
Sektion
Artikler