Dronedrab og etik – i princippet og i praksis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v21i1.106139Resumé
I artiklen argumenteres der for, at de moralske problemer i den militære praksis med målrettede dronedrab knytter sig til en række bestemte karakteristika ved dronekrig, som er definitoriske. Det er derfor problematisk, at der ofte abstraheres fra disse karakteristika, når moralfilosoffer diskuterer, om dronekrig ”i princippet” er moralsk forsvarlig eller ej,Referencer
Ackerman, S. (2016). US to continue 'signature strikes' on people suspected of terrorist links. The Guardian. Tilgængelig på: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/01/obama-continue-signature-strikes-drones-civilian-deaths
Arkin, R. (2010). The Case for Ethical Autonomy in Unmanned Systems. Journal of Military Ethics, årg. 9, s. 332-41.
Blank, L.R. (2012). Targeted Strikes: The Consequences of Blurring the Armed Conflict and Self-Defense Justifications. William Mitchell Law Review, årg. 38, s. 1655-1700.
Boyle, M.J. (2015). The legal and ethical implications of drone warfare. The International Journal of Human Rights 19, s. 105-26.
Braun, M. & Brunstetter, D.R. (2013). Rethinking the Criterion for Assessing CIA-targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality and Jus Ad Vim. Journal of Military Ethics, årg. 12, s. 304-324.
Brooks, R. (2014). Drones and the International Rule of Law. Ethics & International Af-fairs, årg. 28, s. 83-103.
Buchanan, A. & Keohane, R. (2015). Toward a Drone Accountability Regime. Ethics & International Affairs, årg. 29, s. 15-37.
Carrol, R. (2012). The philosopher making the moral case for US drones. Tilgængelig på: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/02/philosopher-moral-case-drones.
Chamayou, G. (2015). Drone Theory. London: Penguin Books.
Cloud, D.S. (2011). Anatomy of an Afghan War Tragedy. Los Angeles Times. Tilgængelig på: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/apr/10/world/la-fg-afghanistan-drone-20110410
Hallgarth, M.W. (2013). Just War Theory and Remote Military Technology: A Primer. I: B.J. Strawser (red.). Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military. N.Y., Oxford UP.
Henriksen, A. & Ringsmose, J. (2017). Slagmarkens moral og risikofri krig med droner. Politik, årg. 20(1), s. 12-20.
ICJ (International Court of Justice) (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Tilgængelig på: http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf
International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School) & Global Justice Clinic (NYU School of Law) (2012). Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. Tilgængelig på: http://chrgj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Living-Under-Drones.pdf.
Kahn, P. (2002). The Paradox of Riskless Warfare. Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly, 22(3), s. 2-8.
Kilkullen D. & Exum A. (2009). Death from Above, Outrage Down Below New York Times, 16. maj 2009. Tilgængelig på: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/opinion/17exum.html
Kretzmer, D. (2005). Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence? The European Journal of International Law, årg. 16, s. 171–212.
Matulich, D. (2012). Why COIN Principles Don't Fly with Drones. Small Wars Journal, årg. 24, 24. february 2012. Tilgængelig på: http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/why-coin-principles-dont-fly-with-drones
Mayer, J. (2015). The Predator War. I: M. Cohn (red.). Drones and Targeted Killing: Legal, Moral and Geopolotical Issues, MA: Olive Branch Press, s. 63-76.
McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in War. Oxford: Oxford UP.
McMahan, J. (2012). Targeted Killing: Murder, Combat, or Law Enforcement? I: C. Finkelstein et al. (red.), Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetric World. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Plaw, A. (2013). Counting the Dead: The Proportionality of Predation in Pakistan. I: BJ Strawser (ed.), Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military. N.Y.: Oxford UP.
Rosén, F. (2013). Extremely Stealthy and Incredibly Close: Drones, Control, and Legal Responsibility. Copenhagen: DIIS Working Paper 2013: 04. Tilgængelig på: http://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/40139/WP2013_04_frro_Extremely_Stealthy.pdf.
Schwebel, S.M. (1996). International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons: Dissenting Opinion of Vice-President Schwebel. Tilgængelig på: http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-09-EN.pdf.
Singer, P.W. (2010). The Ethics of Killer Applications. Journal of Military Ethics. årg. 9, s. 299-312.
Sparrow, R. (2009). Predators or plowshares? arms control of robotic warfare. IEEE technology and society Magazine, årg. 28, s. 25–29.
Steinhoff, U. (2013). Killing Them Safely: Extreme Asymmetry and Its Discontents. I: B.J. Strawser (red.). Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military. N.Y.: Oxford UP.
Strawser, B.J. (2010). Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehi-cles. Journal of Military Ethics, årg. 9, s. 342-68.
Strawser, B.J. (2012). The Morality of Drone Warfare Revisited. The Guardian. Tilgængelig på: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/06/morality-drone-warfare-revisited.
Strawser, B.J. (2013). Introduction: The Moral Landscape of Unmanned Weapons. I: B.J. Strawser (red.). Killing by Remote Control: The Ethics of an Unmanned Military. N.Y.: Oxford UP.
Waldron, J. (2012). Justifying Targeted Killing with a Neutral Principle? I: C. Finkelstein et al. (red.). Targeted Killings: Law and Morality in an Asymmetric World. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Whetham, D. (2015). Drones to protect’, The International Journal of Human Rights, årg.19, s. 199-210.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).
