”Hvordan har du sovet i nat, Per?”: En samtaleanalytisk undersøgelse af navne i hjemmeplejesamtaler
AbstractWhen names occur in utterances, they can function as selecting a new speaker in conversations. But
what happens when names occur in two-party conversations where using names for selecting a new
speaker then seems irrelevant?
This paper investigates the use of names in a conversation from the Danish homecare system. The
conversation is between an elderly male citizen and his caretaker. There were several occurrences
of the citizen’s name in the conversation, and these form the basis for the analysis. Using a
collection based analysis a hypothesis was developed for the name-phenomenon to see if there was
One line of research suggests that names in this position serve a special purpose like the one found
to hold true in this paper, where others say that the position of the name in the end of utterances
make it an object for deletion which may question its role. The paper concludes that the following
tendency is present in the data under question: The name occurs primarily turn finally in utterances
that start a new sequence and which furthermore contain something problematic, especially
concerning something intimate and integrity threatening according to the citizen where reestablishment
of a mutual relation is attempted. This paper thus contributes to the understanding of
the use of names in two-party conversations in line with the former view, and disagrees with the
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 61-67.
Brown, Roger & Marguerite Ford. 1961. Address in American English. Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology 62(2): 375-385.
Butler, Carly W., Susan Danby & Michael Emmison. 2011. Address Terms in Turn Beginnings:
Managing Disalignment and Disaffiliation in Telephone Counseling. Research on Language
and Social Interaction 44(4): 338-358.
Clayman, Steven E. 2010. Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview
talk. Discourse & Communication 4(2): 161-183.
Gill, Virginia Teas & Felicia Roberts. 2013. Conversation Analysis in Medicine. I: Stivers, Tanya
& Jack Sidnell (red.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Black well.
Gordon, Cynthia. 2013. Beyond the observer’s paradox: the audio-recorder as a resource for the
display of identity. Qualitative Research 13(3): 299-317.
Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh & Paul Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. London: Sage
Heinemann, Trine. 2011. From Home to Institution: Roles, Relations, and the Loss of Autonomy in
the Care of Old People in Denmark. I: Backhaus, Peter (red.). Communication in Elderly
Care. Cross-Cultural Approaches. London: Continuum. 90-111.
Hepburn, Alexa & Galina B. Bolden. 2013. The conversation analytic approach to transcription.
I:Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell (red.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford:
Black well. 57-76.
Heritage, John & Tanya Stivers. 1999. Online Commentary in Acute Medical Visits: A Method in
Shaping Patient expectations. Social Science & Medicine 49(11): 1501-1517.
Jefferson, Gail. 1973. A Case of Precision Timing in Ordinary Conversation: Overlapped Tag-
Positioned Address Terms in Closing Sequences. Semiotica 9(1): 47-96.
Jefferson, Gail. 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. I:
Psathas, George (red.). Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York:
Irvington Publishers. 79-95.
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. I: Atkinson, J. Maxwell
& John Heritage (red.). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 346-369.
Labov, William. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1): 97-
Lee, Seung-Hee. 2013. Response Design in Conversation. I: Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell (red.)
The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Black well. 415-432.
Lerner, Gene H. 2003. Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free
organization. Language in Society 32(2): 177-201.
Özcan, Fatma Hülya. 2016. Choice of Address Terms in Conversational Setting. International
Journal of Human Sciences 13(1): 982-1002.
PASS. 2016. http://www.passinfo.dk/SOSU-uddannelsen/Uddannelsens_indhold/Grundforloeb-
SOSU (besøgt d. 19/11 2016).
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Pursuing a response. I: Atkinson, J. Maxwell & John Heritage (red.).
Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. 152-163.
Pomerantz, Anita & B. J. Fehr. 1997. Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social
Action as Sense Making Practices. I: van Dijk, Teun Adrianus (red.). Discourse as Social
Interaction. London: Sage Publications. 64-91.
Rendle-Short, Johanna. 2007. “Catherine, you’re wasting your time”: Address terms within the
Australian political interview. Journal of Pragmatics 39(9): 1503-1525.
Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to
Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction. I: Psathas, George (red.). Everyday Language.
Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers. 15-22.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the
Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50(1): 696-735.
Sidnell, Jack. 2013. Basic Conversation Analytic Methods. I: Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell (red.).
The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Black well. 77-99.
Snow, Catherine E. 1995. Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and
developmental differences, and necessary causes. I: Fletcher, Paul & Brian MacWhinney
(red.). The handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell. 180-193.
Speer, Susan A. & Ian Hutchby. 2003. From ethics to analytics: aspects of participants’ orientations
to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology 37(2): 315–337.
Steensig, Jakob. 2001. Sprog i virkeligheden: Bidrag til en interaktionel lingvistik. Aarhus: Aarhus
How to Cite
The author/the authors hold the rigths to articles presented in the journal. The author/the authors are granted the right to reproduce their article as they see fit, if they mention LWorks as the original publisher of the article.