Than Meets the Eye:

A Corpus Study of English Comparison Particles

Forfattere

  • Anna-Merete Thinggaard Aarhus Universitet

Nøgleord:

korpuslingvistik, BNC, sammenligningspartikler, engelske præpositioner

Resumé

This paper analyses data from the BNC to examine the distribution of the comparison particles than and as in their use as either prepositions or as complementisers, signalled through the case on the following pronoun. The comparison particles are used as prepositions in 85.0% of the occurrences, but considerable variation is found across the individual pronouns. Notably, the 1st person singular is barely used in the nominative case, i.e. as a complementiser, and the 3rd person singular feminine and masculine pronouns exhibit the highest rate of nominative uses. It is suggested that the limited use of 1st person singular nominative may be attributable to genre effects of the data available in the BNC whereas the preference for 3rd person singular nominative remains unclear. Additionally, the data suggests that both formality levels and genre affect the distributions of prepositional and complementiser use as more formal texts have a higher percentage of nominative pronouns and less formal text and spoken language a lower percentage.

 

Forfatterbiografi

Anna-Merete Thinggaard, Aarhus Universitet

Anna-Merete Thinggaard is a Master’s student of English at Aarhus University with a minor in German. Her research interests include syntax, comparative linguistics, and language change.

Referencer

Aston, Guy, and Lou Burnard. 1998. The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748628889.

BNC. 1994. British National Corpus. 1994. https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/.

Boyland, Joyce Tang. 2001. ‘Hypercorrect Pronoun Case in English? Cognitive Processes That Account for Pronoun Usage’. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, edited by Joan Bybee and Paul J. Hopper, 383–404. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.

Britannica. 2024. ‘Ask the Editor: “Better than I” or “Better than Me”?’ The Britannica Dictionary. 2024. https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/eb/qa/better-than-I-or-better-than-me. Accessed May 3, 2025.

Brittain, Lewis. 1788. Rudiments of English Grammar. L.J. Urban.

Culpeper, Jonathan, and Mathew Gillings. 2018. ‘Politeness Variation in England: A North-South Divide?’ In Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech, 33–59. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268323.

Dauenhauer, Frank. 2021. ‘How and When Does One Use “than I” and “than Me” in a Sentence?’ Accessed May 3, 2025.

Davies, Mark. 2011. ‘Synchronic and Diachronic Uses of Corpora: Interview with Mark Davies’. In Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics, edited by Vander Viana, Sonia Zyngier, and Geoff Barnbrook, 63–80. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.48.

———. 2013. ‘GloWbE’. 2013. https://www.english-corpora.org/glowbe/.

———. 2015. ‘Introducing the 1.9 Billion Word Global Web-Based English Corpus (GloWbE)’. The 21st Century Text (blog). 30 June 2015. https://21centurytext.wordpress.com/introducing-the-1-9-billion-word-global-web-based-english-corpus-glowbe/. Accessed March 28, 2025.

Doyle, Gabe. 2012. ‘“Than I” and “than Me”’. Motivated Grammar (blog). 13 June 2012. https://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2012/06/13/than-i-and-than-me/. Accessed May 3, 2025.

Ehlers, Katrine Rosendal. 2020. ‘Sin og sig med Flertalsantecedent fra Runesten til LANCHART’. In Danske studier. 2020, 48–84. Universitets-Jubilæets danske Samfund, nr. 602. København: Syddansk Universiteitsforlag.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2010. Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.3

Gries, Stefan Th. 2011. ‘Methodological and Interdisciplinary Stance in Corpus Linguistics: Interview with Stefan Th. Gries’. In Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics, edited by Vander Viana, Sonia Zyngier, and Geoff Barnbrook, 81–98. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.48.

Hale, Adrian, and Helen Basides. 2023. Keys to Academic English. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009289009.

Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hundt, Marianne. 1998. New Zealand English Grammar – Fact or Fiction?: A Corpus-Based Study in Morphosyntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g23.

Hyland, Ken, and Feng (Kevin) Jiang. 2017. ‘Is Academic Writing Becoming More Informal?’ English for Specific Purposes 45 (January):40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001.

Jäger, Agnes. 2019. ‘The Syntax of Comparison Constructions in Diachronic and Dialectal Perspective’. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4 (1): 1–51. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.651.

Jespersen, Otto, and Niels Haislund. (1949) 1974. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part VII: Syntax. Repr. Vol. VII. VII vols. London: Allen & Unwin.

Jones, Christian, and Daniel Waller. 2015. Corpus Linguistics for Grammar: A Guide for Research. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713779.

Kuo, Chih-Hua. 1999. ‘The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles’. English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1992. ‘Corpora and Theories of Linguistic Performance’. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82 Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991, edited by Jan Svartvik, 105–22. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM] 65. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867275.

———. 2007. ‘New Resources, or Just Better Old Ones? The Holy Grail of Representativeness’. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, edited by Marianne Hundt, Nadja Nesselhauf, and Carolin Biewer, 133–49. Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791.

Love, Robbie. 2020. Overcoming Challenges in Corpus Construction: The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429429811.

Lowth, Robert. 1763. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. 2nd ed., Corrected. London: A. Millar, and R. and J. Dodsley.

Manning, Christopher D., and Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Meyer, Charles F. 2023. English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107298026.

Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2004. ‘The State of the Art in Corpus Linguistics: Three Book-Length Perspectives’. English Language & Linguistics 8 (1): 103–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674304001261.

Perlman, Merrill. 2019. ‘More than Me, or More than I? The Big Debate’. Columbia Journalism Review. 25 February 2019. https://www.cjr.org/language_corner/more-than-me-more-than-i.php. Accessed May 3, 2025.

Quinn, Heidi. 2005. Distribution of Pronoun Case Forms in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.82.

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, eds. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.

Taylor, Charlotte. 2016. Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus-Assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.267.

University of Oxford. n.d. ‘BNC User Manual - Design of the Corpus’. Text. natcorp.ox.ac.uk. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/archive/worldURG/design.xml. Accessed 16 December 2024.

Visser, Frederik Theodor. 1963. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Vol. 1. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill.

Voelkel, Svenja, and Franziska Kretzschmar. 2021. Introducing Linguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316884485.

Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, Shih-ping, Wen-Ta Tseng, and Robert Johanson. 2021. ‘To We or Not to We: Corpus-Based Research on First-Person Pronoun Use in Abstracts and Conclusions’. SAGE Open 11 (2): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008893.

Willis, David. 2017. ‘Investigating Geospatial Models of the Diffusion of Morphosyntactic Innovations: The Welsh Strong Second-Person Singular Pronoun chdi’. Journal of Linguistic Geography 5 (1): 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2017.1.

Downloads

Publiceret

2025-08-02

Citation/Eksport

Thinggaard, A.-M. (2025). Than Meets the Eye:: A Corpus Study of English Comparison Particles. Journal of Language Works - Sprogvidenskabeligt Studentertidsskrift, 10(1), 57–71. Hentet fra https://tidsskrift.dk/lwo/article/view/158595