Loss of Morphological Case in English and Danish

Authors

  • Anna-Merete Thinggaard Aarhus University

Keywords:

Danish, English, Case loss, Language change

Abstract

This paper examines why case morphology was lost in English and Danish. This is done by first outlining the developments of case from the earliest stages of both languages until case was left only on the personal pronouns as in the present-day varieties of the languages. I present two hypotheses that may contribute to an explanation of this loss of case: distinctiveness and structural vs. non-structural case. Furthermore, a comparison of English and Danish is made in order to better understand what factors may or may not cause languages to change on the basis of these two hypotheses. References to other Germanic languages are made when it proves useful. I argue that, while it is possible that phonological distinctiveness plays a part in the development, it is more likely that the non-structural cases have a higher susceptibility to loss than structural cases since non-structural cases are easier to replace. This is done by considering the nouns and the personal pronouns respectively in relation to the two hypotheses.

References

Allen, Cynthia L. 2002. ‘Case and Middle English Genitive Noun Phrases’. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, edited by D. W. Lightfoot, 57-80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250691.003.0003.

———. 2003. ‘Deflexion and the Development of the Genitive in English’. English Language & Linguistics 7 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674303211023.

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2009. ‘The Development of Case in Germanic’. In The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case, edited by Jóhanna Barðdal and Shobhana L. Chelliah, 123–60. John Benjamins.

Biberauer, Theresa, and George Walkden. 2015. ‘Introduction: Changing Views of Syntactic Change’. In Syntax over Time, edited by Theresa Biberauer and George Walken, 1-13. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687923.003.0001.

Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case, 2nd ed. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164894.008.

Brunner, Karl. 1970. An Outline of Middle English Grammar. Translated by Grahame Johnston. Oxford: Blackwell.

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2004. The Syntax of Old Norse: With a Survey of the Inflectional Morphology and a Complete Bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/asb/detail.action?docID=422566.

Friðriksson, Finnur. 2011. ‘Modern Icelandic: Stable or in a State of Flux?’ Edited by Veturliði Óskarsson. Scripta Islandica 62: 19–50.

Hansen, Aage. 1956. ‘Kasusudviklingen i Dansk’. In Festskrift til Peter Skautrup, edited by Svend Aakjær, 183–193. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

Hansen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard. 2021. ‘Forgrundsinformationsnominativ eller kasusløshed’. NyS : Nydanske Sprogstudier, no. 59: 57–90.

Hejná, Míša, and George Walkden. 2022. A History of English. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Howe, Stephen. 2013. The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages: A Study of Personal Pronoun Morphology and Change in the Germanic Languages from the First Records to the Present Day. Berlin/Boston, GERMANY: De Gruyter, Inc. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/asb/detail.action?docID=3044742.

Jensen, Eva Skafte. 2002. ‘Kasus i Gammeldansk’. Ny forskning i grammatik, no. 9 (October). https://doi.org/10.7146/nfg.v10i9.23902.

———. 2012. ‘Markedness, Participation and Grammatical Paradigms: Jakobson and Hjelmslev Revisited’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35 (2): 145–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586512000170.

———. 2018. ‘“It Is Me” – the Replacement of the Nominative by the Oblique Form in Danish Subject Complements’. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 50 (1): 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2018.1436414.

Jørgensen, Henrik. 2002. ‘Nogle Problemer Angående Kasusudviklingerne i de Germanske Sprog’. In M/K - Mod og Kvindehjerte, edited by Jens Cramer, Ole Togeby, and Peter Widell, 215–27. Aarhus: Modtryk.

Lass, Roger. 1992. ‘Phonology and Morphology’. In The Cambridge History of the English Language: Volume 2: 1066–1476, edited by Norman Blake, 2:23–155. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003.

Los, Bettelou. 2015. A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

McFadden, Thomas. 2020. ‘Case in Germanic’. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, edited by Michael T. Putnam and B. Richard Page, 1st ed., 282–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378291.014.

Perridon, Harry. 2013. ‘The Emergence of the S-Genitive in Danish’. Language Sciences 36 (March): 134–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.004.

Petersen, Kathrine Thisted. 2018. Udviklingen af Inkorporation fra Gammeldansk til Moderne Dansk: Fra Umarkerede Kasusformer til Markeret Artikelløshed og Enhedstryk. Universitets-jubilæets danske samfunds skriftserie, nr. 596. København: Universitets-jubilæets danske samfund.

———. 2019. ‘The Development of Complex Predicates from Old Danish to Modern Danish: A Diachronic Survey of the Connection between Case, Bare Nouns, and Stress Pattern’. Arkiv För Nordisk Filologi, no. 134: 131–91.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. A History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Woolford, Ellen. 2006. ‘Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure’. Linguistic Inquiry 37 (1): 111–30. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321175.

Wright, Laura, ed. 2020. The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Topics in English Linguistics, volume 107. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-10

How to Cite

Thinggaard, A.-M. (2022). Loss of Morphological Case in English and Danish: Array. Journal of Language Works - Sprogvidenskabeligt Studentertidsskrift, 7(1), 5–21. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/lwo/article/view/132781