En konversationsanalytisk undersøgelse af kropssproglige ressourcer til mindskelse af overlap og gaps i radioproduktioner
This paper examines how the facilitator in the context of radio and podcast productions makes use of the potential communicative resources of embodied language in reducing overlaps and gaps between speakers in interactions. The study is based upon a production of F.C. Københavns Fanradio and it proposes that especially Kendon’s open hand supine (OHS) gesticulations and Streeck’s mid-turn offerings (MTO) are used by the facilitator in an explicitly embodied selection of a next speaker and thereby preventing incidences of unwanted gaps between speakers. Additionally, this study shows how the facilitator engages nonverbally in the interaction during other participants’ turns by producing what I have chosen to call embodied comments. These embodied comments consist of one or more gestures that have a collective semantical meaning that can be understood as interactionally meaningful by other participants. The study proposes that these nonverbal engagements are expressions of co-construction and participate in the reduction of occurrences of overlaps in interactions.
Jefferson, G. (1983). Notes on a Possible Metric which Provides for a ’Standard Maximum’ Silence of Approximately One Second in Conversation. Tilburg papers in language and literature 42. http://liso-archives.liso.ucsb.edu/Jefferson/Metric.pdf
Kendon, A. (2004). Two gesture families of the open hand. In Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance (pp. 248-283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511807572.013
Kobayashi, H. (2001). Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution 40, 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2001.0468
Montgomery, M. (2017). Talking for fun and talking in earnest: Two styles of mediated broadcast talk. In Mortensen, J., Coupland, N. & Thøgersen, J. (Eds.) Style, Mediation and Change: Sociolinguistic perspectives on talking media (pp. 199-222). Oxford University Press.
Nevile, M. (2015). The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(2), 121-151, DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499
Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (2009). Gaze, questioning, and culture. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, pp. 187-249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511635670.008
Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in Conversation. In Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J. (Eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 308-329. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch15
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010.
Schegloff, E. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1-63. doi:10.1017/S0047404500001019
Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. In Semiotica 2005 (156), 1-20. 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1.
Streeck, Jürgen (2009). Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal of Language Works
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The author/the authors hold the rigths to articles presented in the journal. The author/the authors are granted the right to reproduce their article as they see fit, if they mention LWorks as the original publisher of the article.