Læs hvad der siges – hør hvad der står
En undersøgelse af læse- og lytteforståelse
Using a corpus consisting of questionnaire responses from 110 test persons analyzed with a 2x2 Analysis of Variance comparing readers and listeners of the same non-fictional text, as well as comparing readers and listeners of the same fictional text, no quantitative difference was found in the way participants comprehended a text according to input modus (reading and listening). However, by looking at the answers to the individual questions typologically – distinguishing between deduction-based and memory/fact-based questions – the results show that there is a qualitative difference. This difference indicates that oral texts enhance deductive processing, whereas written texts enhance memory, i.e. readers are better at remembering/recalling facts. This paper supports the claim that modal input does indeed influence how efficiently we comprehend texts. However, this influence is very much dependent on the distribution of memory- versus deduction-based content, and not so much on a distinction between non-fiction and fiction. Thus, differences in input modality are shown to be more driven by text content than by text type.
Dehaene, Stanislas. 2009. Reading in the brain: the new science of how we read. New York: Penguin Books.
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader: explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Iser, Wolfgang. 1972. The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach. New Literary History 3.2. 279-299.
Kemmerer, David. 2015. Cognitive neuroscience of language. New York: Psychology Press.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological review 74.6. 431-461.
McGregor, William. 2013. Linguistics: an introduction. Second edition. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Rogowsky, Beth A., Calhoun, Barbara M. & Tallal, Paula. 2016. Does Modality Matter? The Effects of Reading, Listening, and Dual Modality on Comprehension SAGE Open [Online], 6. 3 13 12 2016. http://d223wx6eb72vcz.cloudfront.net/content/spsgo/6/3/2158244016669550.full.pdf.
Steensig, Jakob. 2001. Sprog i virkeligheden: bidrag til en interaktionel lingvistik. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Vilhauer, Ruvanee P. 2016. Inner reading voices: An overlooked form of inner speech. Psychosis 8.1. 37-11.
How to Cite
The author/the authors hold the rigths to articles presented in the journal. The author/the authors are granted the right to reproduce their article as they see fit, if they mention LWorks as the original publisher of the article.