Old Testament Law, Pastoral Counseling, and Community Engagement in Lutheran Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/hn.v9i2.150837Keywords:
Mosaic law, Old Testament law, Luther, antinomism, natural law, positive law, folk law, Sachsenspiegel, supersessionism, replacement theology, law and gospel, Biblical ethics, New Covenant, ethical guidance, pastoral counselling, community engagementAbstract
The paper explores Martin Luther's stance on Old Testament law, specifically his dismissal of the Mosaic law’s binding nature for Christians. It argues that Luther’s reliance on natural law as an inherent instinct for grasping the order of creation raises challenges due to the inherent ambiguity and fallen nature of human understanding. The analysis delves into biblical, philosophical, and historical perspectives on natural law, underscoring the intricacies surrounding its practical application. Additionally, the article criticizes Luther’s supersessionist theology, which posits the replacement of Mosaic law by Christ, asserting that it lacks exegetical rigor. The significance of comparative studies in comprehending Mosaic Law is demonstrated by drawing insights from ancient Near Eastern legal traditions. This approach presents a model that views Mosaic law as normative covenantal instruction adaptable to real-life situations. Building on these insights, the paper recommends considering Richard Averbeck’s and Nicolai Winther-Nielsen’s approaches to Mosaic law and its application in contemporary Christian life.
References
themovie. 2023. “1946 | The Mistranslation That Shifted a Culture”. https://www.1946themovie.com.
Arand, Charles P. 2011. “Luther’s Radical Reading of the Sabbath Commandment”. In Perspectives on the Sabbath. 4 Views, edited by John Donato, 216–61. Nashville, TN: B & H Publishing Group.
Aristotle. 1926. Rhetoric. Edited by J. H. Freese. Medford, MA: Harvard University Press & William Heinemann. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/.
Aulen, Gustaf. 1941. “Luther Och Politiken”. Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift 17 (3): 177–96.
Averbeck, Richard E. 2016. “The Egyptian Sojourn and Deliverance from Slavery in the Framing and Shaping of the Mosaic Law”. In “Did I Not Bring Israel Out of Egypt?” Biblical, Archaeological, and Egyptological Perspectives on the Exodus Narratives, edited by James K. Hoffmeier, Alan R. Millard, and Gary A. Rendsburg, 143–75. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781575064307-011
Averbeck, Richard E. 2020. “Review of Roy E. Gane, ‘Old Testament Law for Christians’”. Andrews University Seminary Studies 58:292–95.
Averbeck, Richard E. 2022. The Old Testament Law for the Life of the Church: Reading the Torah in the Light of Christ. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.
Avis, P. D. L. 1975. “Moses and the Magistrate: A Study in the Rise of Protestant Legalism”. Journal of Ecclesiastical History 26 (2): 149–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022046900045978.
Barmash, Pamela. 2018. “Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Law”. Religion Compass 12 (April):e12262. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12262.
Barmash, Pamela. 2020. The Laws of Hammurabi: At the Confluence of Royal and Scribal Traditions. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197525401.001.0001.
Bartor, Assnat. 2010. Reading Law as Narrative: A Study in the Casuistic Laws of the Pentateuch. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
Bartor, Assnat. 2012. “Reading Biblical Law as Narrative”, Prooftexts 32 (3): 292–311. https://doi.org/10.2979/prooftexts.32.3.292.
Bayer, Oswald. 1998. “Nature and Institution: Luther’s Doctrine of the Three Orders”. Lutheran Quarterly 12:125–59.
Berman, Joshua A. 2017. Inconsistency in the Torah: Ancient Literary Convention and the Limits of Source Criticism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190658809.001.0001.
Bornkamm, Heinrich. 1969. Luther and the Old Testament. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
Braaten, Carl E. 1992. “Protestants and Natural Law”. First Things (1): 20–26.
Braaten, Carl E. 2007. “Reclaiming the Natural Law for Theological Ethics”. Journal of Lutheran Ethics 7 (10). https://www.elca.org/JLE/Articles/484.
Brock, Brian. 2007. Singing the Ethos of God: On the Place of Christian Ethics in Scripture. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1889. Librorum de Re Publica Sex. Edited by C. F. W. Mueller. Medford, MA: Teubner.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. n.d. “De Legibus”. The Latin Library. Accessed 19 December 2023. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/leg1.shtml.
Confucius and Arthur Waley. 2005. The Analects of Confucius. Psychology Press.
Cooper, Jordan. 2015. The Great Divide: A Lutheran Evaluation of Reformed Theology. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
Cover, Robert. 1983. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term. Foreword: Nomos and Narrative”. Harvard Law Review 97 (4): 4–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787.
Douglas, Mary. 1999. Leviticus as Literature. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Etxabe, Julen. 2010. “The Legal Universe After Robert Cover”. Law and Humanities 4 (1): 115–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2010.11423778.
Glass, J. D. 2022. “How a Bible Error Changed History and Turned Gays Into Pariahs”. Advocate. 17 December 2022. https://www.advocate.com/religion/2022/12/17/how-bible-error-changed-history-and-turned-gays-pariahs.
Gosnell, Peter W. 2014. The Ethical Vision of the Bible: Learning Good from Knowing God. Downers Grove, Illinois: IVP Academic.
Haines, William A. 2006. “Aristotle on the Unity of the Just”. Méthexis 19 (1):57–77. https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000493.
Hazlitt, William, trans. 1872. Table Talk DLXXVII. Philadelphia, PA: The Lutheran Publication Society. https://ccel.org/ccel/luther/tabletalk/tabletalk.
Herntrich, V. 1938. “Luther Und Das Alte Testament”. In Lutherjahrbuch, 93–124.
Kofoed, Jens Bruun. 2020. “Encoding and Decoding Culture”. In Write That They May Read: Studies in Literacy and Textualization in the Ancient Near East and in the Hebrew Scriptures:Essays in Honour of Professor Alan R. Millard, edited by Daniel I. Block, David C. Deuel, John Collins, and Paul J. N. Lawrence, 240–62. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.
Lea, Henry Charles. 2017. Materials Toward a History of Witchcraft, Volume 1. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Leithart, Peter. 2020. “What to Do with the Bible’s Purity Laws”. The Gospel Coalition. 15 January 2020. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/purity-laws/.
Longenecker, Richard N. 1990. Word Biblical Commentary Vol. 41, Galatians. Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, TX: Word Books.
MacPherson, Ryan C. 2020. “Natural Law in the Lutheran Reformation”. LOGIA 29 (1): 13–19.
Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno. 2009. “Food Taboos: Their Origins and Purposes”. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-18.
Moo, Douglas J. 2008. The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon. The Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. https://doi.org/10.5040/bci-000g.
National Archives. 2023. “Declaration of Independence: A Transcription”. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript.
Pearson, Thomas D. 2010. “Martin Luther’s Pragmatic Revision of Traditional Natural Law Theory”. Journal of Lutheran Ethics 10 (3). https://www.elca.org/jle/articles/316.
Pieper, Franz. 1950. Christian Dogmatics. Vol. 1. 3 vols. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House.
Poythress, Vern S. 2001. Symphonic Theology: The Validity of Multiple Perspectives in Theology. Illustrated edition. Phillipsburg, N.J: P & R Publishing.
Simpson, Gary M. 2010. “‘Written on Their Hearts’: Thinking with Luther About Scripture, Natural Law, and the Moral Life”. Word & World 30 (4): 419–28.
Sophocles. 1891. Antigone. Edited by R. C. Jebb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://classics.mit.edu/Sophocles/antigone.html.
Tappert, Theodore G. 1967. Selected Writings of Martin Luther. Vol. 2. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
Volf, Miroslav. 2011. A Public Faith: How Followers of Christ Should Serve the Common Good. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.
Wejse, Johanne Jedig. 2022. ”Træl, slave eller tjener: Ingen af dem dækker rigtigt ordvalget hos Jesus”. Kristeligt Dagblad, 13 May 2022. https://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/kirke-og-tro/trael-slave-eller-tjener-ingen-af-dem-daekker-rigtigt-ordvalget-hos-jesus.
Winther-Nielsen, Nicolai. 2018. “Mosebøgernes Brug Som Vejledning”. In Den Kristne Forkyndelse - Teori Og Praksis Fra Bibelen, i Historien, Til Verden, edited by Jakob Olsen, 14–67. Fredericia: Kolon.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jens Bruun Kofoed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Counting from volume 9 (2024), articles published in HIPHIL Novum are licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). The editorial board may accept other Creative Commons licenses for individual articles, if required by funding bodies e.g. the European Research Council. With the publication of volume 9, authors retain copyright to their articles and give Hiphil Novum the right to the first publication. The authors retain copyright to earlier versions of the articles, such as the submitted and the accepted manuscript. Authors and readers may use, reuse, and build upon the published work, use it for text or data mining or for any other lawful purpose, as long as appropriate attribution is maintained.
Articles in volumes 1-8 are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors may post the published version of their article to their personal website, institutional repository, or a repository required by their funding agency as a part of a green open access policy.
