Massedigitalisering som arkiv for arbejderhistorie: Potentialer og udfordringer

Authors

  • Henriette Roued

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/ah.y2025i2.162034

Abstract

The article explores how mass-digitised searchable sources can support citizen-engaged dissemination, offering a way to address the lack of archival material about previously overlooked pioneering women in labour history. It draws on the Wikipedia edit-a-thons held at the Workers Museum in connection with the exhibition Kvindeliv, which addressed the biases shaping both historical narratives, labour archives and digital platforms like Wikipedia. Experiences from these events show that access to sources is crucial for sustaining contributions about women on Wikipedia. Digitised and OCR-processed materials, such as older works of biographical and local history as well as contemporary newspapers, hold significant potential for expanding the narrative of women in the labour movement. At the same time, the experiences demonstrate that limited access to such sources, often attributed to copyright restrictions, continues to hinder a more diverse and representative dissemination of labour history.

References

1. Arbejdermuseet vil skrive flere kvinder ind i historien med ny udstilling, 2023, https://web.archive.org/web/20240223160205/https://www.arbejdermuseet.dk/arbejdermuseet-vil-skrive-flere-kvinder-ind-i-historien

2. Jytte Larsen, Kvinderne eller folkets grundlov? Køn og klasse i kampen om ejerskabet til 1915-grundloven, s. 143-153, Arbejderhistorie, nr. 1, 2017, s. 143ff.; Martin Andersen, Kønnet solidaritet. Dansk Kvindesamfunds fremstilling af arbejderkvinderne, 1885-1910, s. 64-88, Arbejderhistorie, nr. 2, 2022, s. 66ff.

3. Wiki Labs Kultur, Wikipedia, 2025, https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiLabsKultur&oldid=12099292

4. Henriette Roued-Cunliffe, Forgotten History on Wikipedia, s. 67-76, iParticipatory Heritage, Henriette Roued-Cunliffe & Andrea J. Copeland (red.), 2017, s. 67ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301256.008

5. Roy Rosenzweig, Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past, s. 117-146, Journal of American History 93, nr. 1, 2006, 117f. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4486062

6. Martha Saxton, Wikipedia and Women’s History. A Classroom Experience, s. 86-94, i Jack Dougherty & Kristen Nawrotzki (red.), Writing History in the Digital Age, Ann Arbor 2013, s. 86f. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65sx57.12

7. Wiki Labs Kultur, 2025, op.cit.

8. Wikieditathon: Flere arbejderkvinder på Wiki, 2023, https://web.archive.org/web/20231002204512/https://www.arbejdermuseet.dk/arrangement/vi-opdaterer-wikipedia/

9. Event Metrics, Wikimedia Meta-Wiki, 2024, https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=EventMetrics&oldid=27885850.

10. Isto Huvila m.fl., LAMs and the Participatory Turn, s. 245-260, i Casper Hvenegaard Rasmussen m.fl. (red.), Libraries, Archives, and Museums in Transition, London 2022, s. 245ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003188834-15

11. Lýsa Westberg Gabriel & Thessa Jensen, Who Is the Expert in Participatory Culture?, s. 117-130, i Henriette Roued-Cunliffe & Andrea J. Copeland (red.), Participatory Heritage, London 2017, s. 117f.

12. Merete Sanderhoff (red.), Sharing is caring. Åbenhed og deling i kulturarvssektoren, København 2014, s. 49f.

13. Rabia Latif Khan, Deconstructing Afghan Historiography. A Case Study of Hazara History Writing, s. 201-220, Afghanistan 5, nr. 2, 2022, s. 201ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/afg.2022.0093

14. Heritage Practice Communities in a Digitized World, https://web.archive.org/web/20250718075104/https://www.uantwerpen.be/en/research-groups/heritage-practice-communities-in-a-digitized-world/

15. Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Faro Convention, 2005), 28 Arbejderhistorie nr. 2 2025

https://web.archive.org/web/20250902152926/https://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/faro-convention.

16. Arthur Barker & Johan Swart, Platforms of knowledge: architectural heritage practice and the information age in South Africa, s. 56-73, Virtual Archaeology Review,11, nr. 22, 2020, s. 71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2020.12234

17. Ann Cvetkovich, In the Archive of Lesbian Feelings, s. 241-271, i An Ar-chive of Feelings. Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures, Durham 2003, s. 248.

18. Pernille Siegumfeldt, Kulturen hyrer flere daglejere end landbruget, Akademikerbladet, 5.8.2018.

19. Cvetkovich, 2003, op.cit., s. 248.

20. Heather Ford & Judy Wajcman, ‘Anyone Can Edit, Not Everyone Does. Wikipedia’s Infrastructure and the Gender Gap’, s. 511-527, Social Studies of Science, 47, nr. 4, 2017, s. 511ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717692172

21. Ulrike Strasser, Women Matter, Facts Matter, History Matters. Or, Why I Started Teaching with Wikipedia, s. 245-251, e Sixteenth Century Journal, 50, nr. 1, 2019, s. 245ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/SCJ5001035

22. Melissa Adler, Wikipedia and the Myth of Universality, s. 1-15, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling, 5, nr. 1, 2016, s. 1ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/ntik.v5i1.25879

23. Amanda Menking & Ingrid Erickson, The Heart Work of Wikipedia. Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World’s Largest Online Encyclopedia, s. 207-210, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 18. april 2015, s. 207ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702514

24. Aaron Halfaker m.fl., The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System. How Wikipedia’s Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline, s. 664-688, American Behavioral Scientist, 57, nr. 5, 2013, s. 664ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469365

25. Jenn Brandt, The Activist Possibilities of Wikipedia. Praxis, Pedagogy, and Potential Pitfalls, s. 312-330, i Public Feminisms. From Academy to Community, Lever Press, 2022, s. 312ff.

26. Ang Li m.fl., Successful Online Socialization. Lessons from the Wikipedia Education Program, s. 1-24, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4, nr. CSCW1, 2020, s. 1ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3392857

27. Rosenzweig, 2006, op.cit., s. 117f.

28. Francesca Tripodi, Ms. Categorized. Gender, Notability, and Inequality on Wikipedia, s. 1687-1707, New Media & Society, 25, nr. 7, 2023, s. 1687ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211023772

29. Roued-Cunliffe, 2017, op.cit., s. 67ff.

30. Ingen førstehåndsforskning, Wikipedia, 2023, https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Ingen

f%C3%B8rsteh%C3%A5ndsforskning&oldid=11413833.

31. Skriv Wikipedia fra et neutralt synspunkt, Wikipedia, 2024, https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SkrivWikipediafraetneutraltsynspunkt&oldid=11852912.

32. Verificerbarhed, Wikipedia, 2024, https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Verificerbarhed&oldid=11714065.

33. Amanda Menking & Jon Rosenberg, WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, and Other Stories Wikipedia Tells Us. A Feminist Critique of Wikipedia’s Epistemology, s. 455-479, Science, Technology & Human Values, 46, nr. 3, 2021, s. 455ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920924783

34. Strasser, 2019, op.cit., s. 245ff.

35. Tripodi, 2023, op.cit., s. 1687ff.

36. Henriette Roued-Cunliffe, Documenting and Visualising Family Networks. Family Trees and Wikipedia, s. 40-53, Akademisk Kvarter / Academic Quarter, 15, 2017, s. 40ff.

37. Isto Huvila, Where Does the Information Come From? Information Source Use Patterns of Wikipedia, Information Research, 15, nr. 3, 2010.

38. Tripodi, 2023, op.cit., s. 1687ff.

39. Arbejdermuseet vil skrive flere kvinder ind i historien med ny udstilling, 2023, op.cit.

40. Jana Smith Elford, Recovering Women’s History with Network Analysis. A Case Study of the Fabian News, s. 191-213, The Journal of Modern Periodical Studies, 6, nr. 2, 2015, s. 191f. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/jmodeperistud.6.2.0191

41. Augusta Jørgensen, Wikipedia, 2023, https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AugustaJ%C3%B8rgensen&oldid=11592192.

42. Louise Augusta F. Jørgensen Pio Arkiv, https://abm.reindex.net/ABA/main/T.php?Ifm=Pz&zoomed=10002&qe=mta=4038 (sidst besøgt 29.09.2025)

43. Henriette Roued m.fl., Search, Save and Share. Family Historians’ Engagement Practices with Digital Platforms, s. 187-206, Archival Science, 23, nr. 2, 2023, s. 187ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-022-09404-4

44. Roued m.fl., 2023, op.cit., s. 187ff

45. Om biblioteket, Danskernes Historie Online, 2025, https://web.archive.org/web/20250906123440/https://slaegtsbibliotek.dk/om-biblioteket

46. Slægtsforskernes Bibliotek Årsrapport 2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20240616164450/https://slaegtsbibliotek.dk/Aarsrapport2019.pdf.

47. Per Hundevad Andersen, 56% øget brug af Danskernes Historie Online i 2024, Danskernes Historie Blog, 31.12.2024.,

https://web.archive.org/web/20250806172335/https://blog.slaegtsbibliotek.dk/2024/12/31/2024

48. Per Hundevad Andersen, Digitalisering er da ikke bare digitalisering!, Danskernes Historie Blog, 15.10.2024.,

https://web.archive.org/web/20250718160409/https://blog.slaegtsbibliotek.dk/2024/10/15/digitalisering

49. Clara Black m.fl. (red.),Kvindelige Akademikere 1875-1925, Gyldendal, 1925 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q133831992&oldid=2387620971 (digitaliseret versioner)

50. De første 379 kvindelige akademikere: Kreativ formidling og Wiki-værksted, Københavns Universitet, 2025, https://komm.ku.dk/kalender/2025/de-foerste-379-kvindelige-akademikere-kreativ-formidling-og-wiki-vaerksted (sidst

besøgt 30.09.2025) DOI: https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.909005

51. Per Hundevad Andersen, Kan man slægtsforske med Google?, Danskernes Historie Blog, 30.09.2025., https://blog.slaegtsbibliotek.dk/2025/09/30/google (sidst besøgt 30.09.2025) 30 Arbejderhistorie nr. 2 2025

52. Pia Fris Laneth, 1915. Da kvinder og tyende blev borgere, København, 2015

53. Oluf Bertolt, Pionerer. Mændene fra Halvfjerdsernes Arbejderbevægelse, København, 1938

54. Få hjælp til at finde aviser, Det Kgl. Bibliotek, 2025, https://web.archive.org/web/20250815143722/https://www.kb.dk/find-materiale/guides/aviser; Lov om Statens Avissamling i Aarhus, Lov nr. 181 af 17/05/1916, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/1916/181 (sidst besøgt d. 30.09.2025)

55. Svend Larsen, Statens Avissamling i Århus, s. 99-124, Bibliotekshistorie, 5, nr. 1, 1999, s. 99ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/bh.v5i1.35897

56. Digitalisering af aviserne, Det Kgl. Bibliotek, 2025, https://web.archive.org/web/20250909192054/https://www.kb.dk/find-materiale/samlinger/avissamlingen/digitalisering-af-aviserne

57. Mediestream, Statsbiblioteket, 2013, https://web.archive.org/web/20130116200405/http://www.statsbiblioteket.dk/

mediestream; Avissamlingen, Det Kgl. Bibliotek, 2025, https://web.archive.org/web/20250620132137/https://www.kb.dk/find-materiale/samlinger/avissamlingen

58. Det Kgl. Bibliotek, Digitalisering af aviserne, 2025, op.cit.

59. Aviser, Mediestream, https://www2.statsbiblioteket.dk/mediestream/avis (sidst besøgt 30.09.2025)

60. Ejerløse aviser, Mediestream, https://www2.statsbiblioteket.dk/mediestream/info/ejerloese-aviser (sidst besøgt 30.09.2025)

61. Hvordan får jeg adgang til Mediestream?, Mediestream, https://www2.statsbiblioteket.dk/mediestream/info/adgang (sidst besøgt 30.09.2025)

62. Ejerløse aviser, op.cit.

63. Søgning på ‘Benthe Østrup Madse, Mediestream, https://www2.statsbiblioteket.dk/mediestream/search/%22benthe%20%C3%B8strup%20madsen%22 (sidst besøgt 22.07.2025)

64. Avissamlingen, op.cit.

65. Cultural Heritage. Digitisation, Online Accessibility and Digital Preservation. Consolidated Progress Report on the Implementation of the Recommendation (2011/711/EU) 2015-2017, European Commission, 2018, https://web.archive.org/web/20250823195447/https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/european-commission-report-cultural-heritage-digitisation-online-accessibility-and-digital

66. Faro –Participation in Cultural Heritage, Cultural Heritage Agency, Netherlands, 2024, https://web.archive.org/web/20250807061610/https://english.cultureelerfgoed.nl/topics/faro---participation-in-cultural-heritage

67. Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Delpher: digitaal archief met historische kranten, tijdschriften, boeken en radiobulletins, 2025,

https://web.archive.org/web/20250918133405/https://www.kb.nl/over-ons/diensten/delpher

68. Josefine Albris & Lene Wul, Arkivet som demokratisk kulturarvslaboratorium, Arbejderhistorienr. 2, 2025.

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Roued, H. (2025). Massedigitalisering som arkiv for arbejderhistorie: Potentialer og udfordringer. Arbejderhistorie, (2), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.7146/ah.y2025i2.162034

Issue

Section

Artikler