Intergenerational Dialogue in Humanities Education: Integrating Age Perspectives in Undergraduate Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ageculturehumanities.v9i1.158574Keywords:
intergenerational dialogue, intergenerational pedagogy, humanities education, age studiesAbstract
This pedagogical essay addresses college students’ lack of engagement with aging—a challenge rooted in institutional unpreparedness to embrace age perspectives that has become increasingly urgent amid growing calls for intergenerational solidarity. Using a 100-level English course, “Intergenerational Dialogue: Modernism and Contemporary Literature,” as a case study, I propose a new pedagogy of “intergenerational dialogue” for integrating age perspectives into general-education humanities courses. The course stages figurative dialogues between twentieth and twenty-first-century texts. Unlike traditional approaches that focus on intergenerational relations among real people or those depicted in texts, this method explores how a dialogic relationship between texts from different generations can inform real-world intergenerational exchange. The essay first argues for the significance of this pedagogy beyond age studies by suggesting the rich potential of an intergenerational lens for rethinking literary history. It then demonstrates how this pedagogy was put into classroom practice through: pre-class questions that directed students’ critical attention to age-related depictions, intergenerational comparisons of paired texts, and assignments that practiced the method. I also explain how this approach, while borrowing from comparative practices common in classroom settings, advances scholarly efforts to move beyond the traditional mode of “compare and contrast” toward a fluid, relational model. The paper concludes with reflections on areas for improvement for future critical inquiry into this pedagogy.
References
Alfano, Christopher J., and Suzanne L. Cook. “Pedagogy for an Aging World: Intergenerational Learning and Association.” Annual Conference Proceedings Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education, Congress, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario, 2014.
Bakhtin, Michail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. 12 printing, Univ. of Minnesota, 2011.
Berman, Jessica Schiff. Modernist Commitments: Ethics, Politics, and Transnational Modernism. Columbia University Press, 2011.
Calasanti, Toni, et al. “Ageism and Feminism: From Et Cetera To Center.” NWSA Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, 2006, pp. 13–30, https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2006.18.1.13.
Charise, Andrea. “What Is Intergenerational Storytelling? Defining the Critical Issues for Aging Research in the Humanities.” Journal of Medical Humanities, vol. 43, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 615–37, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-022-09735-4.
Cheah, Pheng. “The Material World of Comparison.” New Literary History, vol. 40, no. 3, 2009, pp. 523–45, https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.0.0105.
Chonody, Jill M. “Addressing Ageism in Students: A Systematic Review of the Pedagogical Intervention Literature.” Educational Gerontology, vol. 41, no. 12, Dec. 2015, pp. 859–87, https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2015.1059139.
Dimock, Wai Chee. “A Theory of Resonance.” PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, vol. 112, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1060–71, https://doi.org/10.2307/463483.
---. “Introduction: Genres as Fields of Knowledge.” PMLA/Publications of the
Modern Language Association of America, vol. 122, no. 5, 2007, pp. 1377–88, https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2007.122.5.1377.
---. “Weak Network: Faulkner’s Transpacific Reparations.”
Modernism/Modernity, vol. 25, no. 3, 2018, pp. 587–602, https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/703532.
Dunn, Patricia. “How to Get Every Student Participating in Discussions: Use “Heads-up Questions.” https://you.stonybrook.edu/eglblog/2018/01/18/how-to-get-every-student-participating-in-discussions-use-heads-up-questions. Accessed 30 July 2025.
Felski, Rita. “Context Stinks!” New Literary History, vol. 42, no. 4, 2011, pp. 573–91, https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/465740.
Felski, Rita, and Susan Stanford Friedman. Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
French, Jade Elizabeth. “Understanding Nuance and Ambivalence in Intergenerational Relationships Through Fiction.” The Gerontologist, edited by Ulla Kriebernegg, vol. 63, no. 10, Dec. 2023, pp. 1619–27, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad051.
French, Jade Elizabeth, et al. “Utopian Method: Reimagining Age Expectations and Intergenerational Relationships Through Reader Responses to Tove Jansson’s The Summer Book (1972).” Age, Culture, Humanities: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 8, Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.7146/ageculturehumanities.v8i.150067.
Friedman, Susan Stanford. “Gender and Genre Anxiety: Elizabeth Barrett Browning and H. D. as Epic Poets.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, vol. 5, no. 2, 1986, p. 203, https://doi.org/10.2307/463995.
---. Planetary Modernisms: Provocations on Modernity across Time. Columbia University Press, 2015.
---. “The Afters and Now of Modernism,” Goulimari, Pelagia, editor. After Modernism: Women, Gender, Race. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023.
García, Alejandro Bonilla. “The Significance of Intergenerational Dialogue in the Global Landscape.” UN Today, 7 June 2023, https://untoday.org/the significance-of-intergenerational-dialogue-in-the-global-landscape/.
Gentry Lamb, Erin. “‘Polyester Pants and Orthopedic Shoes’: Introducing Age Studies to Traditional-Aged Undergraduates.” Age, Culture, Humanities: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 223–38, https://doi.org/10.7146/ageculturehumanities.v1i.129972.
---. “A Home for Age Studies?” Age, Culture, Humanities: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 7, Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.7146/ageculturehumanities.v7i.141350.
Gillespie, Benjamin, and Bess Rowen. “Against Chronology: Intergenerational Pedagogical Approaches to Queer Theatre and Performance Histories.” Theatre Topics, vol. 30, no. 2, 2020, pp. 69–83, https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2020.0030.
Gullette, Margaret Morganroth. American Eldercide: How It Happened, How to Prevent It. The University of Chicago Press, 2024.
Im, Seo Hee. Plenary Roundtable, The Third International Conference of the Modernist Studies in Asia Network, The University of Hong Kong, June 2024
Jensen, Meg. “The Anxiety of Daughterhood, or Using Bloom to Read Women Writers: The Cases of Louisa May Alcott and Virginia Woolf.” Literature Compass, vol. 4, no. 4, 2007, pp. 1208–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00484.x. Accessed Dec 22, 2025.
Kingstone, Helen, and Jennie Bristow, editors. Studying Generations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Bristol University Press, 2024, https://doi.org/10.47674/9781529223507.
Looser, Devoney. “Age and Aging.” The Cambridge Companion to Women’s Writing in the Romantic Period, edited by Devoney Looser, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 169–82, https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139061315.015.
---. “Age and Aging Studies: From Cradle to Grave.” Age, Culture, Humanities: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 25–29, https://doi.org/10.7146/ageculturehumanities.v1i.129938.
---. Women Writers and Old Age in Great Britain, 1750-1850. the J. Hopkins University press, 2008.
Masters, Julie L., et al. “Intergenerational Conversations on Death and Dying during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pedagogical Approach.” Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, vol. 44, no. 4, Oct. 2023, pp. 588–601, https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2022.2119227.
Mintz, Steven. Age Consciousness, Age Segregation and Age Denigration. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/age-consciousness-age-segregation-and-age-denigration. Accessed 16 Jan. 2025.
North, Michael S., and Susan T. Fiske. “An Inconvenienced Youth? Ageism and Its Potential Intergenerational Roots.” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 138, no. 5, Sept. 2012, p. 10.1037/a0027843, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027843.
Port, Cynthia. “No Future? Aging, Temporality, History, and Reverse Chronologies,” Stanford Humanities Center. https://shc.stanford.edu/arcade/publications/occasion/aging-old-age-memory-aesthetics/no-future-aging-temporality-history. Accessed 16 Jan. 2025.
Radhakrishnan, R. “Why Compare?”. Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses.
Edited by Rita Felski and Susan Stanford Friedman, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
Reynolds, Laurinda. “The COVID-19 Pandemic Exposes Limited Understanding of Ageism.” Journal of Aging & Social Policy, vol. 32, no. 4–5, July 2020, pp. 499–505, https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2020.177200.
Saint-Amour, Paul K. “Weak Theory, Weak Modernism.” Modernism/Modernity, vol. 25, no. 3, 2018, pp. 437–59, https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2018.0035.
Segal, Lynne. Out of Time: The Pleasures and Perils of Ageing. Verso, 2013.
Shih, Shu-mei. “Comparison as Relation.” Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. Edited by Rita Felski and Susan Stanford Friedman, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One’s Own. Feedbooks, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Roya Liu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
From issue 6 (2022) onward, the journal uses the CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. The authors retain their copyright. For articles published in previous issues (1,2,3,4 and 5) the authors retain their copyright to their articles. Readers can download, read, and link to the articles published in issues 1-5, but they cannot republish these articles. Authors can upload them in their institutional repositories.