Response to the Contested Language Forum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ageculturehumanities.v7i.136176Keywords:
Contested terms, verbal hygiene, age studies, care work, literary representations of old age, understanding dementia, social inequality, Humanities, literary criticismAbstract
This 'Credo' essay responds to the Contested Terms Forum (Issue 6), exploring why the language used about ageing gives rise to arguments, and examining the particular pressures placed on academic and broader public discourse by geography, regionality, cultural context and, not least, age. Drawing on Deborah Cameron's thinking about 'verbal hygiene', as it sheds light on the social context of all language use and the inevitability of divergent views about 'norms', the essay probes particular points of pressure on discourses of ageing at present. Two recent publications, Wendy Mitchell's What I Wish People Knew about Dementia (2022) and Pope Lonergan's I'll Die After Bingo (also 2022), help to unpack the importance of flexible attitudes to language within care settings. The essay then considers the focus on language as a defining feature of Humanistic study—an element of its critical 'deformation' (in the neutral sociological sense) by contrast with the Social and Medical Sciences. Attention is also given to the forms of flexibility required by literary criticism in its dealings with texts, which will often have historic, dramatic, psychological, emotional or other rationales for employing language that would rightly be rebuked in real-world social settings.
Submitted: 21 February 2023
Published: 19 June 2023
References
Ali, Monica. Brick Lane. Doubleday, 2003.
Barry, Elizabeth. “The Ageing Body”. In The Cambridge Companion to the Body in Literature, ed. David Hillman and Ulrike Maude. Cambridge UP, 2015, pp. 132-48.
British Geriatrics Society, ‘Continence Care in Residential and Nursing Homes’, Good Practice Guide, 19 April 2018, https://www.bgs.org.uk/resources/continence-care-in-residential-and-nursing-homes. Accessed 17 February 2023.
Cameron, Deborah. Verbal Hygiene. Routledge, 1995.
Conran, Alys. Dignity. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2019.
European Working Group for People with Dementia, Guidelines for the ethical and inclusive communication about/portrayal of dementia and people with dementia. Alzheimer Europe,
January 2023. https://www.alzheimer-europe.org/sites/default/files/2023-
/Alzheimer%20Europe%20and%20European%20Working%20Group%20of%2
People%20with%20Dementia%20Guidelines%20for%20the%20ethical%20and%
inclusive%20communication%20about%20portrayal%20of%20dementia%20and
%20people%20with%20dementia.pdf. Accessed 19 February 2023.
Guillory, John. Professing Criticism: Essays on the Organization of Literary Study. Chicago UP, 2022.
Johnson, B. S. House Mother Normal. Introduction by Andrew Motion. 1971; Picador, 2013.
Lamb, Sarah, ed. Successful Aging as a Contemporary Obsession: Global Perspectives. Rutgers UP, 2017.
Lonergan, Pope. I’ll Die after Bingo: The Unlikely Story of My Decade as a Care Home Assistant. Ebury Press, 2022.
Mautner, Gerlinde. ‘Mining Large Corpora for Social Information the Case of Elderly.’ Language in Society, vol. 36, no. 1, 2007, pp. 51-72
Mitchell, Wendy. What I wish people knew about dementia, from someone who knows. Bloomsbury,
"old, adj." OED Online, Oxford University Press, December 2022, www.oed.com/view/Entry/130955. Accessed 21 February 2023.
Phillips, Adam. ‘Against Self-Criticism.’ London Review of Books, vol. 35, no. 5, 5 March 2015.
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v37/n05/adam-phillips/against-self-criticism.
Shakespeare, William. King Lear: A Parallel Text Edition, ed. René Weis. Longman, 1993.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-06-19 (2)
- 2023-06-19 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Helen Small
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
From issue 6 (2022) onward, the journal uses the CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. The authors retain their copyright. For articles published in previous issues (1,2,3,4 and 5) the authors retain their copyright to their articles. Readers can download, read, and link to the articles published in issues 1-5, but they cannot republish these articles. Authors can upload them in their institutional repositories.