“Polyester Pants and Orthopedic Shoes”
Introducing Age Studies to Traditional-Aged Undergraduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/ageculturehumanities.v1i.129972Abstract
This article describes several in-class exercises that can be used to introduce basic age studies concepts to students within one class setting. These exer- cises, built around the Age Assumptions Survey and grounded in age studies theory, are designed for use with traditional (late-adolescent) undergraduates but could be used with other populations and across disciplinary settings, such as graduate or professional students in fields ranging from the human- ities to the social sciences to the healthcare professions. These engagement exercises are intended to (1) introduce age as an identity category that is vari- ably defined and, at least in part, socially constructed; (2) reveal students’ basic assumptions and stereotypes about aging and old age; and (3) pro- vide a limited introduction to ageism. The exercises are designed so that the students generate both content and analysis, structurally forcing students to confront the limitations and ageism in their own assumptions about aging and old age. The self-generated nature of the critique encourages students to accept their own biases rather than profess their impartiality.
References
Abod, Jennifer. Look Us in the Eye: The Old Women’s Project. Long Beach, CA: Profile Productions, 2006.
Barrett, Anne, and Laura Cantwell. “Drawing on Stereotypes: Using Undergraduates’ Sketches of Elders as a Teaching Tool.” Educational Gerontology 33.4 (2007): 327-48.
Cole, Thomas R. The Journey of Life: A Cultural History of Aging in America. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992.
DiGiovanna, Augustine. Human Aging: Biological Perspectives. NY: McGraw-Hill, 2000. Friedan, Betty. The Fountain of Age. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993.
Gullette, Margaret Morganroth. Aged by Culture. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004.
———. Agewise: Fighting the New Ageism in America. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2011.
Holstein, Martha B. and Meredith Minkler. “Self, Society, and the ‘New Gerontology.’”The Gerontologist 43.6 (Dec 2003): 787-96.
Katz, Stephen. Disciplining Old Age: The Formation of Gerontological Knowledge. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1996.
———. Cultural Aging: Essays on Life Course, Lifestyle, and Senior Worlds. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2005.
Marshall, Leni. “Teaching Ripening: Including Age when Teaching the Body.” Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy. 19.2 (Fall 2008/ Winter 2009): 55-80.
Masters, Julie, and Lyn Holley. “A Glimpse of Life at 67: The Modified Future-Self Worksheet.” Educational Gerontology 31.6 (2005): 443-60.
Mosher-Ashley, Pearl, and Pamilee Ball. “Attitudes of College Students toward Elderly Persons and Their Perceptions of Themselves at Age 75.” Educational Gerontology 25.1 (1999): 89-102.
Pew Research Center. “Growing Old in America: Expectations vs. Reality.” Social and Demographic Trends Project. 29 June, 2009.
Rowe, John W. and Robert L. Kahn. “Human Aging: Usual and Successful.” Science (New Series) 237.4811 (Jul. 10, 1987): 143-49.
Sheldon, Jane. “Addressing Stereotypes and Ageism in a Life Span Development Course.” Teaching of Psychology 25.4 (1998): 291-3.
Woodward, Kathleen. “Introduction.” Figuring Age: Women, Bodies, Generations. Ed. Kathleen Woodward. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1999. ix-xxix.
———. “Instant Repulsion: Decrepitude, the Mirror Stage, and the Literary Imagination.” The Kenyon Review 5 (Fall 1983): 43-66.
———. “Performing Age, Performing Gender.” NWSA Journal. 18.1 (Spring 2006): 162-89.
———. “Youthfulness as Masquerade.” Discourse 11.1 (Fall-Winter 1988-89): 119-42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
From issue 6 (2022) onward, the journal uses the CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 license. The authors retain their copyright. For articles published in previous issues (1,2,3,4 and 5) the authors retain their copyright to their articles. Readers can download, read, and link to the articles published in issues 1-5, but they cannot republish these articles. Authors can upload them in their institutional repositories.