Behavioural response of breeding Mute Swans Cygnus olor to lockdown measures: a case study

Main Article Content

Radosław Włodarczyk

Abstract

In spring 2020, human activity was strongly reduced because of restrictions in movements imposed during the Covid-19 pandemic. In Poland, traditional recreational areas and tourist attractions were closed to the public from 24 March to 20 April 2000, which coincided with the time when Mute Swan Cygnus olor pairs establish their breeding territories. Following withdrawal of the restrictions at the end of April, people’s access to the countryside in May and June returned to normal levels. This study compares the breeding performance of Mute Swans at two distinct locations which differ in the level of human activity: a private fish farm closed to the public vs. a dam reservoir which is open to visitors. Fishponds at the Sarnów fish farm are visited on a regular basis only by workers at the site (5–6 people per day), whereas Sulejowski Reservoir is a popular recreational area, especially during weekends, for hundreds of visitors. The reduction in human activity during spring 2020 resulted in a significant increase in the number of breeding pairs at the reservoir (6–7 pairs in years 2015–2019 vs. 15 pairs in year 2020), but the number of breeders on the fishponds did not change significantly (8–11 in years 2015–2019; 10 in year 2020). New territories appeared later at the reservoir in the pandemic year (median laying dates: 8–16 April in 2015–2019; 24 April in 2020). The breeding success of pairs at new locations was very low, with most losing their broods during the fledging period. Nonetheless, the marked change in the year 2020 in the number of Mute Swans breeding at a recreational site suggests that human-related activity may limit the nesting distribution of this species.

Article Details

How to Cite
Włodarczyk, R. (2024). Behavioural response of breeding Mute Swans Cygnus olor to lockdown measures: a case study. Wildfowl, 222–233. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/Wildfowl/article/view/156364
Section
Standard Papers

References

Aronson, M.F.J., La Sorte, F.A., Nilon, Ch.H., Katti, M., Goddard, M.A., Lepczyk, Ch.A., Warren, P.S., Williams, N.S.G., Cilliers, S., Clarkson, B., Dobbs, C., Dolan, R., Hedblom, M., Klotz, S., Kooijmans, J.L., Kühn, I., MacGregor-Fors, I., McDonnell, M., Mörtberg, U., Pyšek, P., Siebert, S., Sushinsky, J., Werner, P. & Winter, M. 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281: 20133330.

Bar, H. 2021. COVID19 lockdown: animal life, ecosystem and atmospheric environment. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23: 8161–8178.

Bateman, P.W. & Fleming, P.A. 2012. Big city life: carnivores in urban environments. Journal of Zoology 287: 1–23.

Beekman, J.H. 1991. Laying date and clutch size in relation to body weight in the Mute Swan Cygnus olor. Wildfowl (Supplement No. 1): 279– 287.

Bielecki, S., Skoczkowski, T., Sobczak, L., Buchoski, J., Macia˛g, Ł. & Dukat, P. 2021. Impact of the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic on electricity use by residential users. Energies 980: 1–33.

Birkhead, M. & Perrins, Ch. 1986. The Mute Swan. Croom Helm, London, UK.

Brua, R.B. & Machin, K.L. 2000. Determining and testing the accuracy of incubation stage of Ruddy Duck eggs by floatation. Wildfowl 51: 181–189.

Chodkiewicz, T., Wardecki, Ł. & Lewandowska, J. (eds). 2021. Final Report of the Bird Monitoring Programme in Poland in Years 2018–2021. NFO, Marki, Warsaw. [In Polish.]

Chodkiewicz, T., Lewandowska, J. & Wardecki, Ł. (eds.). 2022. Report of Field Works within the Bird Monitoring Programme in Breeding Season 2022. NFO, Marki, Warsaw. [In Polish.]

Clausen, K.K., Holm, T.E., Pedersen, C.L., Jacobsen E.M. & Bregnballe T. 2020. Sharing on moulting mute swans Cygnus olor. Journal of Ornithology 161: 469–479.

Coleman, A.E., Coleman, J.T., Coleman, P.A. & Minton C.D.T. 2001. A 39 year study of a Mute Swan Cygnus olor population in the English Midlands. Ardea 89 (Special Issue): 113–121.

Czapulak, A. 2002. Egg size variation in mute swan: its influence on egg hatchability, cygnet body size and cygnet survival. Waterbirds 25 (Special Publication No. 1): 250–257.

Derryberry, E.P., Phillips, J.N., Derryberry, G.E., Blum, M.J. & Luther, D. 2020. Singing in a silent spring: Birds respond to a half-century soundscape reversion during the COVID-19 shutdown. Science 370: 575–579.

Dziennik Ustaw 2020. Poz 566. Regulation by the Cabinet on 31 March 2020 on setting limits, orders and prohibitions in relation to the onset of an epidemic. Polish Parliament, Warsaw, Poland, 31 March 2020. Available at https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails. xsp?id=WDU20200000566 (last accessed 15 August 2024). [In Polish.]

Estela F.A., Sánchez-Sarria, C.E., Arbeláez-Cortés, E., Ocampo, D., García-Arroyo, M., Perlaza-Gamboa, A., Wagner-Wagner, C.M. & MacGregor-Fors, I. 2021. Changes in the nocturnal activity of birds during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in a neotropical city. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 44: 213–217.

Gordo, O., Brotons, L., Herrando, S. & Gargallo, G. 2021 Rapid behavioural response of urban birds to COVID-19 lockdown. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288: 20202513.

Haleem, A. & Javaid, M. 2020. Effects of Covid-19 pandemic in daily life. Current Medicine Research & Practice 10: 78–79.

Łopucki, R., Kitowski, I., Perlin´ska-Teresiak, M. & Klich, D. 2021. How is wildlife affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic? Lockdown effect on the road mortality of hedgehogs. Animals 11: 868.

Manenti, R., Mori, E., Di Canio, V., Mercurio, S., Picone, M., Caffi, M. & Rubolini, D. 2020. The good, the bad and the ugly of COVID-19 lockdown effects on wildlife conservation: insights from the first European locked down country. Biological Conservation 249: 108728.

Marzluff, J.M. 2001. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In J.M. Marzluff, R. Bowman & R. Donnelly (eds.), Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, pp. 19–47. Kluwer, Boston, USA.

Massar, S.A., Ng, A.S., Soon, Ch.S, Ong, J.L., Chua, X.Y., Chee, N.I., Lee, T.S. & Chee M.W.L. 2022. Reopening after lockdown: the influence of working-from-home and digital device use on sleep, physical activity, and wellbeing following COVID-19 lockdown and reopening. Sleep 45(1): zsab250.

McKinney, M.L. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52: 883–890.

McKinney, M.L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127: 247–260.

Morku¯ne˙, R., Bucˇas, M. & Morku¯nas, J. 2023. Macrophyte habitat selection by moulting mute swans and the effect of recreational disturbance in the largest Baltic Sea lagoon. Journal for Nature Conservation 75: 126462.

Rees, E.C., Lievesley, P., Pettifor, R. & Perrins, C. 1996. Mate fidelity in swans: an inter-specific comparison. In J.M. Black (ed.), Partnerships in Birds: the Study of Monogamy, pp. 118–137. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Rees, E.C., Cao, L., Clausen, P., Coleman, J.T., Cornely, J., Einarsson, O., Ely, C.R., Kingsford, R.T., Ma, M., Mitchell, C.D., Nagy, S., Shimada, T., Snyder, J., Solovyeva, D.V., Tijsen, W., Vilina, Y., Włodarczyk, R. & Brides, K. 2019. Conservation status of the world’s swan populations, Cygnus sp. and Coscoroba sp.: a review of current trends and gaps in knowledge. Wildfowl (Special Issue No. 5): 35–72.

Rutz, C., Loretto, M.C., Bates, A.E., Davidson, S.C., Duarte, C.M., Jetz, W., Johnson, M., Kato, A., Kays, R., Mueller, T., Primack, R.B., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Tucker, M.A., Wikelski, M. & Cagnacci, F. 2020. COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4: 1156–1159.

Seress, G., Sándor, K., Vincze, E., Pipoly, I., Bukor, B., Ágh, N. & Liker, A. 2021. Contrasting effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on urban birds’ reproductive success in two cities. Scientific Reports 11: 17649.

Silva-Rodríguez, E.A., Gálvez, N., Swan, G.J., Cusack, J.J. & Moreira-Arce, D. 2021. Urban wildlife in times of COVID-19: what can we infer from novel carnivore records in urban areas? Science of Total Environment: 765.

Vitousek, P., Mooney, H., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J. 2007. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.

Werszczuk, A. & Zalewski, A. 2022. COVID-19 lockdown splits activity peaks of two mesopredators and potentially relaxes interspecific competition in rural habitat. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 33: 166–171.

Wieloch, M. 1984. Numbers and distribution of the Mute Swan Cygnus olor in Poland against the situation of this species in Europe. Acta Ornithological 20: 187–229.

Wieloch, M. 1991. Population trends of the Mute Swan Cygnus olor in the Palearctic. Wildfowl (Supplement No. 1): 22–32.

Wieloch, M., Włodarczyk, R. & Czapulak, A. 2004. The Mute Swan Cygnus olor. Birds of the Western Palearctic (BWP) Update 6: 1–38.

Włodarczyk, R. & Minias, P. 2016. Non-adaptive territory selection by a bird with exceptionally long parental care. PeerJ 4: e1852.

Włodarczyk, R. & Wojciechowski, Z. 2001. The breeding ecology of the Mute Swan Cygnus olor in central Poland. Wildfowl 52: 157– 169.

Włodarczyk, R., Wieloch, M., Czyz˙, S., Dolata, P.T. & Minias, P. 2013. Natal and breeding dispersal in the mute swan Cygnus olor – influence of sex, mate-changing and reproductive success. Acta Ornithologica 48: 237–244.

Wood, K.A. & Newth, J.L. 2024. Swans and lead fishing weights: a systematic review of deposition, impacts and regulations in Europe. Wildfowl (Special Issue No. 7): 27–56.

Wood, K.A., Brown, M.J., Cromie, R.L., Hilton, G.M., Mackenzie, C., Newth, J.L., Pain, D.J., Perrins, Ch.M. & Rees, E.C. 2019. Regulation of lead fishing weights results in mute swan population recovery. Biological Conservation 230: 67–74.

Zar, J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall International Inc., London, UK.