Shifts in site use by spring-staging swans Cygnus sp., from traditional to artificially reclaimed habitat in the Gulf of Finland

Article Sidebar

PDF Supporting Materials PDF
Published: Nov 14, 2024
Keywords:
Bewick’s Swan, foraging, migration, Mute Swan, population monitoring, submerged macrophytes, Whooper Swan

Main Article Content

Yuriy M. Mikhailov
Kseniia A. Kaskova
Olga A. Babkina
Elmira M. Zaynagutdinova

Abstract

Variation in the abundance and habitat use recorded for three swan species – the Bewick’s Swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii, Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus and Mute Swan Cygnus olor – at their main spring staging areas in the coastal waters of Neva Bay, Gulf of Finland, were studied from 2018–2022. The count sites were grouped into two distinct habitat types: “traditional” (defined as natural shallow coastal water areas with low levels of anthropogenic disturbance, supporting a range of emergent vegetation), and “reclaimed” (defined as the shallow waters created behind artificial sand embankments during and following their creation). The numbers of swans using traditional sites varied widely, but never exceeded 121 Bewick’s Swans and 292 Whooper Swans at any one site. At the reclaimed sites, numbers of the two yellow-billed swans increased progressively following completion of the reclamation work, with peak counts ranging from 0–442 Bewick’s Swan and up to 160 Whooper Swans. In contrast, Mute Swans in any one area never exceeded two individuals. Surveys of potential food plants used by swans in summers 2021 and 2022 demonstrated the prevalence of Perfoliate Pondweed Potamogeton perfoliatus at the main stopover sites close to reclaimed areas, together with Hairlike Pondweed Potamogeton trichoides and the green algae Cladophora glomerata. These results suggest that, with the continued gradual colonisation by aquatic vegetation of shallow waters formed near reclaimed areas, there is potential for the number of swans feeding in these areas to increase, provided that the sites are protected (e.g. from disturbance by human activity) and continue to provide suitable habitats for the swans.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mikhailov, Y. M., Kaskova, K. A., Babkina, O. A., & Zaynagutdinova, E. M. (2024). Shifts in site use by spring-staging swans Cygnus sp., from traditional to artificially reclaimed habitat in the Gulf of Finland. Wildfowl, 234–251. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/Wildfowl/article/view/156356
Issue
Wildfowl Special Issue No. 7
Section
Standard Papers

Articles in Wildfowl volumes 1-74 and in Wildfowl Special Issues 1-7  are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively.

The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (which published the journal from 1948–2020 inclusive) retains a royalty-free license in perpetuity to access and use pre-2021 issues for the purposes of research, which may involve sharing with research partners from time to time.

The copyright for this paper belongs to the Author(s). Papers published in Wildfowl 75 (in 2025) and subsequent issues are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

In the articles published in these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors can upload their articles into an institutional repository.

References

Beekman, J.H., van Eerden, M.R. & Dirksen, S. 1991. Bewick’s swans (Cygnus columbianus bewickii) utilizing the changing resource of Potamogeton pectinatus during autumn in the Netherlands. Wildfowl (Supplement No. 1): 238–248.

Beekman, J.H., Nolet, B.A. & Klaassen, M. 2002. Skipping swans: fuelling rates and wind conditions determine differential use of migratory stopover sites of Bewick’s Swans Cygnus bewickii. Ardea Special Issue 90(3): 437–460.

Beekman, J.H., Koffijberg, K., Wahl, J., Kowallik, C., Hall, C., Devos, K., Clausen, P., Hornman, M., Laubek, B., Luigujõe, L., Wieloch, M., Boland, H., Švažas, S., Nilsson, L., Stı¯pniece, A., Keller, V., Gaudard, C., Degen, A., Shimmings, P., Harald, B.-L., Portolou, D., Langendoen, T., Wood, K.A. & Rees, E.C. 2019. Long-term population trends and shifts in distribution of Bewick’s Swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii wintering in northwest Europe. Wildfowl (Special Issue No. 5): 73– 102.

Dirksen, S., Beekman, J.H. & Slagboom, T.H. 1991. Bewick’s Swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii in the Netherlands: numbers, distribution and food choice during the wintering season. Wildfowl (Supplement No. 1): 228–237.

Fedorov, V.A. 2018. About the nesting of the mute swan Cygnus olor within St. Petersburg. Russian Journal of Ornithology 27: 840–846. [In Russian.]

Gubelit, Y.I. & Berezina, N.A. 2010. The causes and consequences of algal blooms: the Cladophoraglomerata bloom and the Neva estuary (eastern Baltic Sea). Marine Pollution Bulletin 61: 183–188.

Klaassen, M. & Nolet, B.A. 2007. The role of herbivorous water birds in aquatic systems through interactions with aquatic macrophytes, with special reference to the Bewick’s swan – Fennel Pondweed system. Hydrobiologia 584: 205–213.

Kouzov, S.A. 2016. Mute swan (Cygnus olor Gmelin 1789) in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland: history of dispersion, distribution of breeding birds and features of biology. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 3. Biology 2: 38–69.

Kouzov, S.A., Gubelit, Y.I., Kravchuk, A.V., Koptseva, E.M. & Nikitina V.N. 2021. Seasonal changes in the diet of Mute Swans Cygnus olor in the recently colonised eastern Gulf of Finland. Wildfowl 71: 83–107.

Kouzov, S.A., Kravchuk, A.V., Abakumov, E.V. & Kouzova, N.I. 2024. Influence of winter temperature and spring ice melt on the reproductive performance of Mute Seans Cygnus olor nesting on offshore islands on the northern edge of its breeding range. Wildfowl (Special Issue No. 7): 202–221.

Krivonosov, G.A. 1991. The status and distribution of the Mute Swan Cygnus olor in the USSR: a review of recent censuses. Wildfowl (Supplement No. 1): 33–38.

Laubek, B., Clausen, P., Nilsson, L., Wahl, J., Sudfelt, C., Wieloch, M., Meissner, W., Shimmings, P., Larsen, B.H., Hornman, M., Langendoen, T., Lehikoinen, A., Luigujõe, L., Stipniece, A., Svazas, S. Sniaukstra, S., Keller, V., Gaudard, C., Devos, K., Musilová, Z., Teufelbauer, N., Rees, E. & Fox, A.D. 2019. Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus January population censuses for Northwest Mainland Europe, 1995–2015. Wildfowl (Special Publication No. 5): 102–121.

Milto, K.D. 2020. The first record of a Mute Swan Cygnus olor nest on the southern coast of the Neva Bay between Petergof and Strelna. Russian Journal of Ornithology 29: 2728–2730.

Nolet, B.A. & Drent, R.H. 1998. Bewick’s swans refuelling on pondweed tubers in the Dvina Bay (White Sea) during their spring migration: first come, first served. Journal of Avian Biology 29: 574–581.

Nolet, B.A., Andreev, V.A., Clausen, P., Poot, M.J.M. & Wessel, E.G.J. 2001. Significance of the White Sea as a stopover for Bewick’s Swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii in spring. Ibis 143: 63–71.

Nowak, A., Maslak, M., Nobis, M., Nowak, S., Kojs, P. & Smieja A. 2015. Is the riparian habitat creation an effective measure of plant conservation within the urbanized area? Ecological Engineering 83: 125–134.

Nuijten, R.J.M., Kölzsch, A., van Gils, J.A., Hoye, B.J., Oosterbeek, K., de Vries P.P., Klaassen M. & Nolet B.A. 2014. The exception to the rule: retreating ice front makes Bewick’s swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii migrate slower in spring than in autumn. Journal of Avian Biology 45: 113–122.

Ozimek, T., Prejs, A. & Prejs, K. 1976. Biomass and distribution of underground parts of Potamogeton perfoliatus L. and P. lucens L. in MikoIajskie Lake, Poland. Aquatic Botany 2: 309–316.

Rees, E.C. & Beekman, J.H. 2010. Northwest European Bewick’s Swans: a population in decline. British Birds 103: 640–650.

Rychkova, A.L. 2009. Spring migration of waterfowl and shorebirds in the sanctuary “Lebyazhy” (Southern coast of the Gulf of Finland) in 2007. In G. Noskov & A. Gaginskaya (eds.), Study of the Dynamics of Migratory Bird Populations and their Trends in North-West Russia. Tuscarora 6: 45–48. [In Russian.]

Rymkevich, T.A., Noskov, G.A., Kouzov, S.A., Ufimceva, A.A., Zaynagutdinova, E.M., Starikov, D.A., Rychkova, A.L. & Iovchenko, N.P. 2012. Results of the synchronized counts of migrating birds in the Neva Bay and adjacent water areas in the spring of 2012. In G. Noskov, T. Rymkevich & A. Gaginskaya (eds.), Study of the Dynamics of Migratory Bird Populations and their Trends in North-West Russia. Tuscarora 9: 70–86. [In Russian.]

Tsvelev, N.N. 2000. Manual of the Vascular Plants of North-West Russia: Leningrad, Pskov and Novgorod Provinces. SPHVA Publishing House, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Whitton, B.A. 1970. Biology of Cladophora in fresh waters. Water Research 4: 457–476.

Wolfer, S.R. & Straile, D. 2004. Spatio-temporal dynamics and plasticity of clonal architecture in Potamogeton perfoliatus. Aquatic Botany 78: 307–318.

Zaynagutdinova, E.M., Kouzov, S.A., Batova, P.R., Mikhailov, Y.M. & Kravchuk, A.V. 2019. Spring migration stopovers of swans Cygnus sp. in the Russian part of the Gulf of Finland. Wildfowl (Special Publication No. 5): 123–138.

Zaynagutdinova, E.M., Mikhailov, Y.M. & Kaskova, K.A. 2020. Mute swan Cygnus olor nesting on the territory of St. Petersburg in 2020. Russian Journal of Ornithology 29: 4066–4069. [In Russian.]

Zaynagutdinova, E.M., Kaskova, K.A., Mikhailov, Y.M. & Kislova, A.A. 2021. Spring migration stopovers of swans in Saint-Petersburg in 2020. Russian Journal of Ornithology 30: 1092–1100. [In Russian.]

Zhigulsky, V.A., Shuisky, V.F., Chebykina, E. Yu., Fedorov, V.A., Panichev, V.V., Uspenskiy, A.A., Zhigulskaya, D.V., Bylina, T.S., Bulysheva, M.M., Bulysheva, A.M. 2020. Macrophyte Thicket Ecosystems of the Neva Bay. Scientific Research Programme: Results of Stage 1. Eco Express Service LLC: 1–304. [In Russian.]