Comparative behaviour of the Anatidae and its evolutionary implications

Article Sidebar

PDF

Main Article Content

Paul A Johnsgard

Abstract

An attempt has been made to summarize, in broad outline, the variations encountered in the behaviour of the Anatidae, and to relate these variations to their probable evolutionary significance. In particular, variations in manner of pair formation and pair bond length, in geographic distribution and ecology, and the related conditions of allopatry or sympatry with other species are discussed and their probable effects on behaviour are suggested. Instances are mentioned where a knowledge of behaviour would be helpful in judging evolutionary relationships that have thus far eluded taxonomists (e.g., Stictonetta, Heteronetta, Thalassornus), and likewise examples are pointed out where behavioural evidence suggests different relationships from those which are currently accepted (e.g., Lophonetta, Anas, leucophrys, and the eiders).

Article Details

How to Cite
Johnsgard, P. A. (1959). Comparative behaviour of the Anatidae and its evolutionary implications. Wildfowl, 31–45. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/Wildfowl/article/view/155717
Issue
The Wildfowl Trust Eleventh Annual Report
Section
Artikler

Articles in Wildfowl volumes 1-74 and in Wildfowl Special Issues 1-7  are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively.

The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (which published the journal from 1948–2020 inclusive) retains a royalty-free license in perpetuity to access and use pre-2021 issues for the purposes of research, which may involve sharing with research partners from time to time.

The copyright for this paper belongs to the Author(s). Papers published in Wildfowl 75 (in 2025) and subsequent issues are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

In the articles published in these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors can upload their articles into an institutional repository.