Additional mortality rate of wildfowl caused by ingestion of lead shotgun pellets: a re-analysis of data from a 70-year-old field experiment on wild Mallards Anas platyrhynchos
Main Article Content
Abstract
A widely-used method for the estimation of numbers of deaths of wildfowl caused by the ingestion of spent lead gunshot pellets depends entirely upon field experiments on wild Mallards Anas platyrhynchos conducted 70 years ago in the USA by Frank C. Bellrose. The validity of this method has recently been questioned because of the simple method used to estimate the annual mortality caused by the experimental administration of lead gunshot and because the administration of shot appeared to increase the risk that treated birds would be shot by hunters, which might bias the mortality estimates. In this paper, we report a re-analysis of Bellrose’s data using a different method which removes the possible effect on mortality estimates of differences in the proportion of birds killed by hunters in the first year after release. Our results indicate that the additional mortality caused by the administration of lead gunshot in the first year after treatment was substantial and dependent upon the dose of gunshot administered, to a similar extent as was found by Bellrose.
Article Details
Articles in Wildfowl volumes 1-74 and in Wildfowl Special Issues 1-7 are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively.
The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (which published the journal from 1948–2020 inclusive) retains a royalty-free license in perpetuity to access and use pre-2021 issues for the purposes of research, which may involve sharing with research partners from time to time.
The copyright for this paper belongs to the Author(s). Papers published in Wildfowl 75 (in 2025) and subsequent issues are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In the articles published in these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors can upload their articles into an institutional repository.