Mallard Anas platyrhynchos lead poisoning risk in central Portugal

Article Sidebar

PDF

Main Article Content

D Rodrigues
M Figueiredo
A Fabiao

Abstract

Lead pellet ingestion by Mallards of Central Portugal ranged from zero to 100%, 99 being the highest number of lead pellets detected in a single gizzard. On rice fields, lead poisoning risk increased during the shooting season through the accumulation of lead pellets on land surface, since ingested lead pellets were only detected three weeks after the beginning of the season. Livers analyzed showed lead concentrations indicating abnormal and acute exposure to lead contamination which most probably resulted in the indirect and direct cause of death of the birds studied. As this study proved that lead poisoning is a cause of waterfowl mortality also in Portugal, Portuguese authorities should implement, as soon as possible, measures concerning the replacement of lead pellets by alternative non-toxic materials.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodrigues, D., Figueiredo, M., & Fabiao, A. (2001). Mallard Anas platyrhynchos lead poisoning risk in central Portugal. Wildfowl, 169–174. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/Wildfowl/article/view/153951
Issue
Wildfowl 52
Section
Short Communications

Articles in Wildfowl volumes 1-74 and in Wildfowl Special Issues 1-7  are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively.

The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (which published the journal from 1948–2020 inclusive) retains a royalty-free license in perpetuity to access and use pre-2021 issues for the purposes of research, which may involve sharing with research partners from time to time.

The copyright for this paper belongs to the Author(s). Papers published in Wildfowl 75 (in 2025) and subsequent issues are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

In the articles published in these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors can upload their articles into an institutional repository.