Edgar Zilsel ‘The Social Roots of Romantic Ideology’ (1933). A translation and commentary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v9i1.141281Keywords:
Austro-Marxism, cult of genius, Edgar Zilsel, fascism, German idealism, German Romanticism, irrationalismAbstract
Edgar Zilsel (1891-1944) was an associate of the Vienna Circle and an Austro-Marxist. He is remembered for the so-called ‘Zilsel Thesis’, a historical reconstruction of the social and economic preconditions for the emergence of modern experimental science written in exile in the USA. His earlier work in Vienna on the cult of genius has recently been revisited by a number of scholars. The aim of this translation is to make one of his writings on this subject available to an Anglophone audience. Here he develops a genealogy of irrationalist ideology—one opposed to the rationalism of urban and commercial culture and to science—whose roots he traces to the German Romantic Movement. He offers a novel account of the interaction between Romantic writers, artists, and philosophers and wider currents of counter-revolutionary thought that emerged as a reaction to the French Revolution. The commentary seeks to contextualize the work as a critical, if indirect, contemporary engagement with fascism and points to its contemporary relevance.
References
Ben-Ghiat, Ruth (2020) Strongmen. How They Rise, Why They Succeed, How They Fail. London: Profile Books.
Benjamin, Walter (1999 [1935]) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, in: Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zorn, 211-244. London: Pimlico.
Dvořák, Johann (2023) Edgar Zilsel und die Einheit der Erkenntnis, updated new edition. Münster: LIT Verlag.
Eagelton, Terry (2016) Culture. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
Fine, Abigial (2020) Assimilating to art-religion: Jewish secularity and Edgar Zilsel’s Geniereligion (1918). Yale Journal of Music and Religion 6(2): 8-32. https://doi.org/10.17132/2377-231X.1169
Jay, Martin (1992) "The Aesthetic Ideology" as Ideology; Or, what does it mean to aestheticize politics? Cultural Critique 21: 41-61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354116
Köhne, Julia B. (2022) Insufficient recognition: Comparing Julian Hirsch’s and Edgar Zilsel’s analyses of the glorification of personalities, in: Donata Romizi, Monika Wulz, and Elisabeth Nemeth (Eds.) Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 27, 219-242. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93687-7_11
McFarland, Rob, George Spitaler, and Ingo Zechner (Eds.) (2020) The Red Vienna Sourcebook. Rochester, NY: Camden House.
Mannheim, Karl (1986 [1925]) Conservatism: A Contribution to the Sociology of Knowledge, edited David Kettler, Volker Meja, and Nico Stehr. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Nemeth, Elisabeth (2022) How to explain the modern personality cult. Some reflections on Edgar Zilsel’s studies on modern genius-veneration, in: Donata Romizi, Monika Wulz, and Elisabeth Nemeth (Eds.) Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 27, 21-43. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93687-7_10
Polanyi, Karl (2018 [1935]) The essence of fascism, in: Claus Thomasberger, and Michele Cangiana (Eds.) Karl Polanyi: Economy and Society. Selected Writings, 81-107. Cambridge: Polity.
Rief, Silvia and Alan Scott (forthcoming) A tale of two sociologies: Empiricism versus ‘metaphysics’ in the early sociology of knowledge, in: Fran Collyer (Ed.) Research Handbook of the Sociology of Knowledge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Riesinger, Bernadetta (2022) The religion of genius taken seriously. Edgar Zilsel’s Die Geniereligion (1918) reviewed as a critical philosophical treatise, in: Donata Romizi, Monika Wulz, and Elisabeth Nemeth (Eds.) Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 27, 243-266. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93687-7_12
Romizi, Donata (2018) Die amerikanische Spitze eines Wiener Eisbergs. Edgar Zilsel und die Frage nach den Möglichkeitsbedingungen von Erkenntnis, in: Max Beck and Nicholas Coormann (Eds.) Historische Erfahrung und begriffliche Transformation. Deutschsprachige Philosophie im Exil in den USA 1933–1945, 78–99. Münster: LIT Verlag.
Sandner, Günther (2022) The cult of genius and its critics: Edgar Zilsel and Otto Neurath, in: Christian Damböck, and Adam T. Tuboly (eds) The Socio-Ethical Dimension of Knowledge: The Mission of Logical Empiricism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 26, 49-63. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80363-6_8
Scott, Alan (2025) The populist and the parvenu: On the continuing relevance of Max Weber’s account of political leadership, in: John Schwarzmantel and Helen Beetham (Eds.) Deformations of Democracy, David Beetham in Contemporary Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Simmel, Georg (1950 [1903]) Metropolis and mental life, in: Kurt H. Wolff (Ed.) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, 409-424. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Snyder, Timothy D. (2018) The Road to Unfreedom. Russia, Europe, America. London: Vintage.
Stadler, Friedrich (2022) From the problem of genius to the integration of philosophy, history, and the sociology of science: Edgar Zilsel’s life and work viewed in the context of recent historiography and research, in: Donata Romizi, Monika Wulz, and Elisabeth Nemeth (Eds.) Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 27, 21-43. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93687-7_2
Taschwer, Klaus (2022) The circumstances of Edgar Zilsel’s failed Habilitation. A case-study on the instigations of anti-semitic and conservative academic networks in the 1920s at the University of Vienna, in: Donata Romizi, Monika Wulz, and Elisabeth Nemeth (Eds.) Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 27, 45-60. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93687-7_3
Uebel, Thomas E. (2005) Political philosophy of science in logical empiricism: The Left Vienna Circle' Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 36: 754–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.014
Weber, Max (1994 [1917)] Suffrage and democracy in Germany, in: Peter Lassman and Ronald Speirs (Eds.) Weber: Political Writings, 80-129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, Max (1994 [1919]) The profession and vocation of politics, in: Peter Lassman and Ronald Speirs (Eds.) Weber: Political Writings, 309-369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, Max (2005 [1906]) The relations of the rural community to other branches of social science, edited and annotated by Peter Ghosh as: Max Weber on ‘The Rural Community’. A critical edition of the English text, History of European Ideas 31: 327 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2005.02.001
Zilsel, Edgar (1926) Die Entstehung des Geniebegriffes. Ein Beitrag zur Ideengeschichte der Antike und des Frühkapitalismus. Tübingen: J.C.B Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Zilsel, Edgar (1990 [1918]) Die Geniereligion. Ein kritischer Versuch über das moderne Persönlichkeitsideal, mit einer historischen Begründung, edited Johann Dvořak. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Zilsel, Edgar (1933) Die gesellschaftlichen Wurzeln der romantischen Ideologie, Der Kampf 26(3/4): 154-164. Available: https://anno.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/anno-plus?aid=dks&datum=1933&pos=85&qid=YHYOMAXYU05QT0271Z7PYAHK7LA59H (retrieved 10 January 2024). Reprinted in Edgar Zilsel Wissenschaft und Weltanschauung edited Gerald Mozetič, 58-73. Vienna: Böhlau, 1996.
Zilsel, Edgar (2000 [1942]) The sociological roots of science, in: Diederick Raven, Wolfgang Krohn, and Robert S. Cohen (Eds.) Edgar Zilsel The Social Origins of Modern Science, 7-21. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zilsel, Edgar (2020 [1932]) The intellectual state of our time? trans. Daniel B. Friedman, in: Rob McFarland, George Spitaler, and Ingo Zechner (Eds.) The Red Vienna Sourcebook, 102-105. Rochester, NY: Camden House.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 alan scott
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC-BY-NC-ND