Differences in Social Science Reporting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v9i1.139666Keywords:
Sociology of Social Sciences, Sociology, Anthropology, Economics, News Media, Social Science ReportingAbstract
Public debate heavily relies on social scientific expertise as demonstrated by recent global events like the coronavirus pandemic. Social scientific knowledge is disseminated and discussed in the mass media, the main arena for the public understanding of social science. However, science communication research overlooks the significance of disciplinary differences in social science reporting while focusing on comparison with the natural sciences. To investigate the reporting of social sciences in the German press as societal communication, anthropology, sociology, and economics are compared within a distant reading approach. In the systematic sample (8,660 articles) over the previous 20 years, the absolute numbers for all disciplines are stagnant, but the share of reporting increases. The section distributions of the three disciplines are quite different but stable over time. In contrast, the sampled periodicals show only subtle differences in reporting. Dramatic events lead to a short-term increase in economics reporting. The combination of the metadata with the semantic structures of the text shows three distinct profiles of social science reporting. These findings reveal the varieties of social science reporting as an important feature in the societal role of the social sciences.
References
Albæk, Erik, Peter Munk Christiansen, and Lise Togeby (2003) Experts in the Mass Media: Researchers as Sources in Danish Daily Newspapers, 1961–2001. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 80(4): 937–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000412.
Bauer, Martin W. (2012) Public Attention to Science 1820–2010 – A ‘Longue Durée’ Picture, in: Rödder, Simone Martina Franzen, and Peter Weingart (Eds.): The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and Its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_3.
Best, Joel (2003) Killing the Messenger: The Social Problems of Sociology. Social Problems 50(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.1.1.
Beyrle, Judith (2016) Die Form der Nachricht, Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845280905.
Blei, David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan (2003) Latent Dirichlet Allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 993–1022.
Böhme-Dürr, Karin (1992) Social and Natural Sciences in German Periodicals. Communications 17(2): 167–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.1992.17.2.167.
Bonfadelli, Heinz, Birte Fähnrich, Corinna Lüthje, Jutta Milde, Markus Rhomberg, and Mike S. Schäfer (Eds.) (2017) Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2.
Burawoy, Michael (2005) For Public Sociology. American Sociological Review 70(1): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102.
Cassidy, Angela (2014) Communicating the Social Sciences: A Specific Challenge?, in: Bucchi, Massimiano, and Brian Trench (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
Cassidy, Angela (2021) Communicating the Social Sciences and Humanities: Challenges and Insights for Research Communication, in: Bucchi, Massimiano, and Brian Trench (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 3rd ed., London: Routledge.
DiMaggio, Paul, Manish Nag, and David Blei (2013) Exploiting Affinities between Topic Modeling and the Sociological Perspective on Culture: Application to Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Government Arts Funding. Poetics 41(6): 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004.
Elmer, Christina, Franziska Badenschier, and Holger Wormer (2008) Science for Everybody? How the Coverage of Research Issues in German Newspapers Has Increased Dramatically. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 85(4): 878–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500410.
Evans, William (1995) The Mundane and the Arcane: Prestige Media Coverage of Social and Natural Science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 72(1): 168–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200114.
Fähnrich, Birte, and Corinna Lüthje (2017) Roles of Social Scientists in Crisis Media Reporting: The Case of the German Populist Radical Right Movement PEGIDA. Science Communication 39(4): 415–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017715472.
Fenton, Natalie, Alan Bryman, and David Deacon (1998): Mediating Social Science, London et al.: SAGE Publications.
Fischhoff, Baruch, and Dietram A. Scheufele (2013) The Science of Science Communication. Introduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(Suppl 3): 14031–32. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312080110.
Fleck, Christian, Matthias Duller, and Victor Karády (Eds.) (2019) Shaping Human Science Disciplines: Institutional Developments in Europe and Beyond, Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92780-0.
Gattone, Charles F. (2012) The Social Scientist as Public Intellectual in an Age of Mass Media. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 25(4): 175–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23279955.
Giddens, Anthony (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Greenacre, Michael, and Jorg Blasius (Eds.) (2006) Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods, New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011319.
Groves, Tamar, Carlos G. Figuerola, and Miguel Á Quintanilla (2016) Ten Years of Science News: A Longitudinal Analysis of Scientific Culture in the Spanish Digital Press. Public Understanding of Science 25(6): 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515576864.
Grundmann, Reiner (2021) Using Large Text News Archives for the Analysis of Climate Change Discourse: Some Methodological Observations. Journal of Risk Research 25(3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1894471.
Hallett, Tim, Orla Stapleton, and Michael Sauder (2019) Public Ideas: Their Varieties and Careers. American Sociological Review 84(3): 545–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419846628.
Hess, Andreas, and Christian Fleck (Eds.) (2016) Knowledge for Whom?: Public Sociology in the Making, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315591162.
Hester, Joe Bob, and Rhonda Gibson (2003) The Economy and Second-Level Agenda Setting: A Time-Series Analysis of Economic News and Public Opinion about the Economy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 80(1): 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000106.
Korte, Jasper W. (2021) Dauerbeobachtungen der Gesellschaft. Wie Printmedien über Sozialwissenschaften berichten, Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. https://www.beltz.de/fachmedien/soziologie/produkte/details/46472-dauerbeobachtungen-der-gesellschaft.html
Korte, Jasper W., Sabine Bartsch, Rasmus Beckmann, Roxanne El Baff, Andreas Hamm, and Tobias Hecking (2023) From causes to consequences, from chat to crisis. The different climate changes of science and Wikipedia. Environmental Science & Policy 148 (2023), 103553.
Lebaron, Frédéric (2006) Nobel Economists as Public Intellectuals : The Circulation of Symbolic Capital. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 43(1): 88–101. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00192299.
Luhmann, Niklas (2012) Theory of Society. Volume 1. Translated by Rhodes Barrett, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas (2013) Theory of Society, Volume 2. Translated by Rhodes Barrett, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Maesse, Jens (2015) Economic Experts: A Discursive Political Economy of Economics. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10(3): 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1050029.
Maesse, Jens (2021) Post-neoliberalism in Europe? How economic discourses have changed through COVID-19 pandemic. Post-filosofie 2021: 119-145. https://doi.org/10.15162/1827-5133/1267.
Maesse, Jens, Stephan Pühringer, Thierry Rossier, and Pierre Benz (Eds.) (2021) Power and Influence of Economists: Contributions to the Social Studies of Economics, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367817084.
Maier, Daniel, A. Waldherr, P. Miltner, G. Wiedemann, A. Niekler, A. Keinert, B. Pfetsch, et al. (2018) Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research: Toward a Valid and Reliable Methodology. Communication Methods and Measures 12(2–3): 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754.
Merton, Robert K., and Alan Wolfe (1995) The Cultural and Social Incorporation of Sociological Knowledge. The American Sociologist 26(3): 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692031.
Moscovici, Serge (2008) Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public, Cambridge: Polity.
Osrecki, Fran (2012) Diagnosing the Present: Towards a Sociology of Medialized Social Science, in: Rödder, Simone Martina Franzen, and Peter Weingart (Eds.): The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and Its Repercussions, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 307–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_16.
Peters, Hans Peter (1988) Sozialwissenschaften in den Massenmedien - Empirische Bestandsaufnahmen: Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiebe, Burckhard (Ed.): Zwischen Marktplatz und Elfenbeinturm. Gesellschaft und Sozialwissenschaften, Berlin: Edition Sigma, 71–82.
Plesner, Ursula (2009) Disassembling the Mass Mediation of Research: A Study of the Construction of Texts, Relations and Positions in the Communication of Social Science, Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet.
Revers, Matthias (2009) Sociologists in the Press. The American Sociologist 40(4): 272–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20638852.
Schäfer, Mike S. (2012) Taking Stock: A Meta-Analysis of Studies on the Media’s Coverage of Science. Public Understanding of Science 21(6): 650–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510387559.
Schäfer, Mike S., Silje Kristiansen, and Heinz Bonfadelli, (Eds.) (2015) Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel, Köln: von Halem.
Scheu, Andreas M., and Anna-Maria Volpers (2017) Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften im öffentlichen Diskurs, in Bonfadelli, Heinz, Birte Fähnrich, Corinna Lüthje, Jutta Milde, Markus Rhomberg, and Mike S. Schäfer (Eds.) Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_21.
Schmierbach, Mike (2005) Method Matters: The Influence of Methodology on Journalists’ Assessments of Social Science Research. Science Communication 26(3): 269–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004273025.
Schwartz, Pepper (1998) Stage Fright or Death Wish: Sociology in the Mass Media. Contemporary Sociology 27(5): 439–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654472.
Shannon, Jennifer, Claire Quimby, Chip Colwell, and Scott Burg (2021) Anthropology, Empathy, and the Need for Social Science Communication. Science Communication 43(4): 529–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211018812.
Siebel, Catherine, and Katherine Clegg Smith (2009) How Public Are We? Coverage of Sociology by the Associated Press. The American Sociologist 40(4): 289–308. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20638853.
Stulpe, Alexander, and Matthias Lemke (2016) Blended Reading, in: Lemke, Matthias and Gregor Wiedemann (Eds.) Text Mining in den Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07224-7_2.
Šuljok, Adrijana (2020) Media Coverage of Different Scientific Disciplines in the Croatian Daily Press – Socio-Historical Perspective. Media Studies 11(21): 44–65. https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/medijske-studije/article/view/9794.
Summ, Annika, and Anna-Maria Volpers (2016) What’s Science? Where’s Science? Science Journalism in German Print Media. Public Understanding of Science 25(7): 775–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515583419.
Suttles, Gerald D., and Mark D. Jacobs (2011) Front Page Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7208/9780226782010/html.
Vestergaard, Gunver Lystbaek, and Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen (2016) Science News in a Closed and an Open Media Market: A Comparative Content Analysis of Print and Online Science News in Denmark and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Communication 31(6): 661–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116674110.
Vestergård, Gunver Lystbæk, and Kristian H. Nielsen (2017) From the Preserves of the Educated Elite to Virtually Everywhere: A Content Analysis of Danish Science News in 1999 and 2012. Public Understanding of Science 26(2): 220–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515603272.
Volpers, Anna-Maria, and Annika Summ (2015) Der Wandel des einst verspäteten Ressorts – Konstanten und Veränderungen der Wissenschaftsberichterstattung in deutschen Printmedien, in: Schäfer, Mike S., Silje Kristiansen, and Heinz Bonfadelli, (Eds.) Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel, Köln: von Halem, 233–57.
Weingart, Peter (2015) Die Stunde der Wahrheit? zum Verhältnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissensgesellschaft, Weilerswist: Velbrück Wiss.
Weiss, Carol, and Eleanor Singer (1988) Reporting of Social Science in the National Media, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wessler, Hartmut (1995) Die journalistische Verwendung sozialwissenschaftlichen Wissens und ihre Bedeutung für gesellschaftliche Diskurse. Publizistik 40(1): 20–38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258051875_Die_journalistische_Verwendung_sozialwissenschaftlichen_Wissens_und_ihre_Bedeutung_fur_gesellschaftliche_Diskurse.
Wessler, Hartmut (1997) Verschlungene Pfade: Wie sozialwissenschaftliches Wissen in die Medienberichterstattung einfließt. Relation: Beiträge zur vergleichenden Kommunikationsforschung 4(1): 117–48. https://www.oeaw.ac.at/cmc/publications/book-series-relation/prior-editions/vol-4-1-wissenschaft-und-oeffentlichkeit-i/.
Wien, Charlotte (2014) Commentators on Daily News or Communicators of Scholarly Achievements? The Role of Researchers in Danish News Media. Journalism 15(4): 427–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913490272.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jasper Korte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC-BY-NC-ND
