Allowing for Ambiguity in the Social Sciences
Else Frenkel-Brunswik’s methodological practice in The Authoritarian Personality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v7i1-2.132541Keywords:
Else Frenkel-Brunswik, The Authoritarian Personality, History of social science methodology, Psychoanalysis and Sociology, Theodor W. Adorno, historical praxeology, mixed methods, research on authoritarianismAbstract
This paper gives a micro-sociological view on the methodology used by Else Frenkel-Brunswik in the famous study The Authoritarian Personality (Adorno et al. 1950). A thorough reconstruction of the theoretical and methodological concepts of Else Frenkel-Brunswik eventually allows for a full appreciation of her works from a today’s social research perspective, especially of her role in the field of authoritarianism-research. The paper deals with (i) Else Frenkel-Brunswik’s role in the research team of The Authoritarian Personality, (ii) the way she followed up on her earlier work, (iii) the question of in which ways her parts of the study were object of criticism by the numerous critics of TAP, and (iv) the ways she herself responded to these critics. The material basis for such an approach is the archival material available in the “Archive for the History of Sociology in Austria (AGSO)” in Graz, Austria, which holds parts of the estate of Else Frenkel-Brunswik, most of all her correspondence and unpublished typoscripts of later publications, as well as at the Institute for Jewish Research (YIVO) in New York, which holds the papers of the American Jewish Committee, i.e., draft reports, memoranda, and some interview protocols of the TAP study.
References
Adorno, Theodor W. (1972) Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der deutschen Soziologie, in: Adorno, Theodor W., Soziologische Schriften I, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 500–531.
Adorno, Theodor W. (2019a) Bemerkungen zu ‚The Authoritarian Personality‘ und weitere Texte. Edited by Eva-Maria Ziege. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Adorno, Theodor W. (2019b) Remarks on The Authoritarian Personality, in: Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford: The Authoritarian Personality. In collaboration with Betty Aron, Mara Hertz Levinson and William Morrow. With a new intro¬duction by Peter E. Gordon, xli–lxvi. London; New York: Verso.
Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford (1950) The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Ash, Mitchell (1998) Wissenschaftswandel durch Zwangsauswanderung – Kurt Lewin und Else Frenkel-Brunswik nach 1933, Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte 37: Historische Migrationsforschung: 251–272.
Benetka, Gerhard (2020) Zur Psychologie der Unbestimmtheit: Ambivalenz und Ambiguität, in: Bernhard Plé, Peter Wilhelmer, and Gerhard Benetka (Eds.): Facetten der Ungewissheit. Erträge aus interdisziplinären Betrachtungen, 83–95. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993) Concluding Remarks: For a Sociogenetic Understanding of Intellectual Works, in: Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Edited by Calhoun, Craig J., Edward LiPuma and Moishe Postone, 263–275. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Christ, Michaela, and Maja Suderland (Eds.) (2014) Soziologie und Nationalsozialismus. Positionen, Debatten, Perspektiven. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Christie, Richard, and Marie Jahoda (Eds.) (1954) Studies in the Scope and Method of “The Author¬itarian Personality”. Continuities in Social Research. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Fleck, Christian (2011) A Transatlantic History of the Social Sciences. Robber Barons, the Third Reich and the Invention of Empirical Social Research. London; New York: Bloomsbury Aca-demic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849662932.
Fleck, Christian (2020) Einstellung, in: Christian Fleck and Christian Dayé (Eds.) Meilensteine der Soziologie, 215–223. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1939) Mechanisms of Self-Deception, The Journal of Social Psychology, S.P.S.S.I. Bulletin 10: 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1939.9713377.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1974 [1940]) Psychoanalysis and Personality Research, in: Else Frenkel-Brunswik: Selected Papers. Edited by Nanette Heiman and Joan Grant, Psychological Issues 8(3), Monograph 3, 36–57. New York: International University Press.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1942) Motivation and Behavior, Genetic Psychology Monographs 26:
–265.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949), Intolerance of Ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality Variable. Journal of Personality 18: 108–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.
tb01236.x.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1952) Interaction of Psychological and Sociological Factors in Political Behav¬ior. American Political Science Review 46(1): 44–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1950761.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1954a) Further Explorations by a Contributor to “The Authoritarian Per-sonality”, in: Richard Christie and Marie Jahoda (Eds.) Studies in the Scope and Method of “The Authoritarian Personality”, 226–275. Continuities in Social Research. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1954b) Psychoanalysis and the Unity of Science. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 80(4): 271–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/20023659.
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1954c) Environmental Controls and the Impoverishment of Thought, in: Carl Friedrich (Ed.) Totalitarianism: Proceedings of a Conference Held at the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, March 1953), 171–202. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674332621.c15.
Frenkel-Brunswik E. (1954d) Social research and the problem of values; a reply. Journal of abnor¬mal psychology 49(3): 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062810.
Frenkel, Else, and Edith Weisskopf (1937) Wunsch und Pflicht im Aufbau des menschlichen Lebens. Psychologische Forschungen über den Lebenslauf. Edited by Charlotte Bühler and Else Frenkel. Wien: Gerold & Co.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, and R. Nevitt Sanford (1945) Some personality factors in anti-semitism, The Journal of Psychology 20, 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1945.9917259.
Geuter, Ulfried (1984) Die Professionalisierung der deutschen Psychologie im Nationalsozialismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Gordon, Peter E. (2018) The authoritarian personality revisited: Reading Adorno in the age of Trump. In: Wendy Brown, Peter E. Gordon, and Max Pensky, Authoritarianism. Three In-quiries in Critical Theory, 45–84. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, Peter E. (2021) Realism and Utopia in The Authoritarian Personality, Polity 54(1): 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/717190.
Heilbron, John (2011) Practical Foundations of Theorizing in Sociology: The Case of Pierre Bourdieu, in: Charles Camic, Neil Gross, and Michèle Lamont (Eds.) Social Knowledge in the Making, 181–205. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.
Heiman, Nanette, and Joan Grant (1974) Introduction, in: Frenkel-Brunswik, Else: Selected Papers. Edited by Nanette Heiman and Joan Grant, Psychological Issues 8(3), Monograph 3, 3–35. New York: International University Press.
Hopf, Christel (1993) Authoritarians and Their Families: Qualitative Studies on the Origins of Authoritarian Disposition, in: William F. Stone, Gerda Lederer, and Richard Christie (Eds.) (1993) Strength and Weakness. The Authoritarian Personality Today, 119–143. New York et al.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7_6.
Jaensch, Erich (1938) Der Gegentypus. Psychologisch-anthropologische Grundlagen deutscher Kulturphilosophie, ausgehend von dem was wir überwinden wollen. Leipzig: Verlag von Jakob Ambrosius Barth.
Kranebitter, Andreas (2020) Rebels without a cause? ‘Criminals’ and fascism in The Authoritarian Personality, Journal of Classical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X20978506.
Kranebitter, Andreas (2022) Tiefe Oberflächenpsychologie statt oberflächlicher Tiefenpsychologie. Zu Leben und Werk von Else Frenkel-Brunswik, in: Oliver Decker, Fiona Kalkstein, and Johannes Kiess (eds.): Demokratie in Sachsen. Jahrbuch des Else-Frenkel-Brunswik-Instituts für 2021, 23–33. Leipzig. Edition Überland.
Kranebitter, Andreas, and Christoph Reinprecht (Eds.) (2019) Die Soziologie und der Nationalsozi¬alismus in Österreich. Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447338.
Kranebitter, Andreas, and Christoph Reinprecht (2020) Soziologie des Autoritarismus und autori¬täre Soziologie. Empirische Sozialforschung in Österreich in der ‚Stunde Null‘, SWS-Rundschau 60(2): 122–141.
Körner, Jürgen (2018). Die Psychodynamik von Übertragung und Gegenübertragung. Vanden-hoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666406096.
Marasco, Robyn (2018) There’s a fascist in the family: Critical theory and antiauthoritarianism, The South Atlantic Quarterly 117(4): 791–813. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7165871.
Minton, Henry (1984) J.F. Brown’s Social Psychology of the 1930s: A Historical Antecedent to the Contemporary Crisis in Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10(1): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167284101003.
Paier, Dietmar (1996) Einleitung, in: Frenkel-Brunswik, Else: Studien zur autoritären Persönlich-keit. Edited by Dietmar Paier (=Bibliothek sozialwissenschaftlicher Emigranten, Band 3), 7–70. Graz; Wien: Nausner & Nausner.
Platt, Jennifer (2012) The History of the Interview, in: Jaber F. Gubrium et al. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research, 9–26. The Complexity of the Craft. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218403.n2.
Ploder, Andrea, and Julian Hamann (2021) Practices of Ethnographic Research: Introduction to the Special Issue, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 50(1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Ray, John J. (1984) Authoritarian attitudes and authoritarian personality among recidivist prison¬ers, Personality & Individual Differences 5(3): 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/
(84)90065-5.
Reinprecht, Christoph (2022) Reflexivität als Gegenstand und Haltung. Heinz Steinert im Dialog mit Pierre Bourdieu, in: Andreas Kranebitter et al. (Eds.) Befreiungswissen als Forschungspro¬gramm. Denken mit Heinz Steinert, 236–252. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Simmel, Ernst (Ed.) (1946) Anti-Semitism. A Social Disease. New York: International Universities Press.
Steinert, Heinz (1984) Das Interview als soziale Interaktion, in: Heiner Meulemann and Karl-Heinz Reuband (Eds.) Soziale Realität im Interview. Empirische Analysen methodischer Probleme, 17–59. Frankfurt am Main; New York: Campus.
Steinert, Heinz (2007a) Das Verhängnis der Gesellschaft und das Glück der Erkenntnis: Dialektik der Aufklärung als Forschungsprogramm (=Kritische Theorie und Kulturforschung, Band 10). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Steinert, Heinz (2007b) Die Widerständigkeit der Theorie, Soziologie 36(4): 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11617-007-0041-3.
Steinert, Heinz, and Gunter Falk (1973) Über den Soziologen als Konstrukteur von Wirklichkeit, das Wesen der sozialen Realität, die Definition sozialer Situationen und die Strategien ihrer Bewälti¬gung, in: Heinz Steinert (Ed.) Symbolische Interaktion. Arbeiten zu einer reflexiven Soziologie, 13–46. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.
Steinmetz, George (2005) Positivism and Its Others in the Social Sciences. Introduction, in: George Steinmetz (Ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences. Positivism and Its Epistemological Others, 1–56. Durham; London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/
1215/9780822386889-001.
Stöwer, Ralph (2011) Erich Rothacker. Sein Leben und seine Wissenschaft vom Menschen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Stone, William F., Gerda Lederer, and Richard Christie (Eds.) (1993) Strength and Weakness. The Authoritarian Personality Today. New York et al.: Springer.
Wolfradt, Uwe, Elfriede Billmann-Mahecha, and Armin Stockolfradt (Eds.) (2017) Deutschsprachige Psychologinnen und Psychologen 1933–1945. Ein Personenlexikon, ergänzt um einen Text von Erich Stern. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15040-2.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-01-18 (2)
- 2023-01-10 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Andreas Kranebitter, Fabian Gruber
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC-BY-NC-ND
