Logical Positivism or Critical Theory as the Methodological Foundation of The Authoritarian Personality?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v7i1-2.132327Keywords:
Critical theory, logical positivism, F-scale, ethnocentrism, research programme, mixed methods, latent variables, cluster analysis, typologies, confirmatory factor analysisAbstract
In this paper, the central research question discusses to what extent logical positivism or critical theory forms the methodological core of the seminal work on the authoritarian personality. A central thesis is that due to her background in psychology, logical positivism and psychoanalysis and her neglected but central role in the authoritarian personality study, Else Frenkel-Brunswik has had a much more lasting and productive influence on authoritarianism research than Adorno as the representative of critical theory. This was certainly not reflected in the public discourse or in intellectual discussions, at least in Europe. This article shows how the original F-Scale was changed in subsequent research and how the application of psychometric techniques improved. However, by employing Lakatos’ concept of the research programme, I analyse how authoritarianism research developed in a degenerative way by reducing the number of factors from nine to three and giving up the psychoanalytic explanation of the underlying mechanisms, a systematic test of sociological and contextual factors, and the original mixed method approach of combining surveys and qualitative interviews. Finally, the issue of the effects of idealisation of parents on the measurement of the items and the use of typologies were not tackled in later research. Employing data from the German General Social Survey (ALLBUS), I describe how some of Frenkel-Brunswik’s central methodological and theoretical ideas have been tested using confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation models. Finally I summarise the way in which the research programme can be developed more fruitfully by integrating developmental psychology, sociology, political science, psychoanalysis and statistical generalised latent variable models.
References
Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford (1950) The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel. J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sandford (2019) The Authoritarian Personality. With Betty Aron, Maria Hertz Levinson, and William Morrow. Intro-duction by Peter E. Gordon. London: Verso.
Adorno, Theodor W. (1995) Studien zum autoritären Charakter, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Adorno, Theodor W. (2019) Bemerkungen zu ‚The Authoritarian Personality‘ und weitere Texte. Edited by Eva-Maria Ziege. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Adorno, Theodor W., Ralf Dahrendorf, Harald Pilot, Jürgen Habermas, and Karl R. Popper, (1972) Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.
Allport, Gordon W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
Altemeyer, Bob (1981) Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Manitoba: The University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, Bob (1988) Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Altemeyer, Bob (1991) The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Altemeyer, Bob (1998) The other “authoritarian personality”, Advances in Experimental Social Psy-chology 30: 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2.
Balzer, Wolfgang (2009) Die Wissenschaft und ihre Methoden: Grundsätze der Wissenschaftstheo-rie. München: Verlag Karl Alber.
Bandura, Albert (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review 84(2): 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Beierlein, Constanze, Frank Asbrock, Matthias Kauff, and Peter Schmidt (2014) Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3). Köln: GESIS-Working Papers 35. Internet: https://search.gesis.org/
publication/gesis-ssoar-42671 (accessed October 22, 2022).
Berger, Martin, and Peter Schmidt (1995) Familienstruktur, Elternwahrnehmung und Autoritarismus, in: Gerda Lederer and Peter Schmidt (Eds.) Autoritarismus und Gesellschaft: Trendanalysen und vergleichende Jugenduntersuchungen, 337–354. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91401-9_15.
Bizumic, Boris (2014) Who coined the concept of ethnocentrism? A brief report, Journal of Social and Political Psychology 2(1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v2i1.264.
Bizumic, Boris, Conal Monaghan, and Daniel Priest (2021) The return of Ethnocentrism, Advances in Political Psychology 42(S1): 29–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12710.
Brown, Timothy A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 2nd edition. New York; London: The Guilford Press.
Carnap, Rudolf (1936) Testability and Meaning, Philosophy of Science 4(1): 419–471. https://doi.org/10.1086/286432.
Carnap, Rudolf (1938) Empiricism and the Language of Science, Synthese 3(12): 33–35.
Carnap, Rudolf (1956) Meaning and necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Christie, Richard E., and Marie Jahoda (1954) Studies in the Scope and Method of “The Authoritar¬ian Personality”. Continuities in Social Research. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Decker, Oliver, Johannes Kiess, and Elmar Brähler (2022) The Dynamics of Right-Wing Extremism within Germany. Escape into Authoritarianism. London: Routledge.
Duckitt, John, and Boris Bizumic (2013) Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism, Political Psychology 34(6): 841–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022.
Duckitt, John (2015) Authoritarian Personality, International Encyclopedia of the Social and Be-haviroral Sciences, Vol. 2, 255–261. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24042-7.
Duckitt, John, and Chris G. Sibley (2017) The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice, in: Chris G. Sibley and Fiona K. Barlow (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, 188–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/
1017/9781316161579.009.
Fahrenberg, Jochen, and John M. Steiner (2004) Adorno und die autoritäre Persönlichkeit, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 56(1): 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-004-0006-3.
Feldmann, Stanley, and Karen Stenner (1997) Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism, Political Psychology 18(4): 741–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00077.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1940) Psychoanalysis and Personality Research, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 35: 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060754.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford (1947) The antidemocratic personality, in: Theodore M. Newcomb and Eugene.L. Hartley (Eds.) Readings in Social Psychology, 531–541. New York: Holt.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1948) A study of prejudice in children, Human relations 1: 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674800100301.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1950) Parents and childhood as seen through the interviews, in: Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford, The Authoritar-ian Personality, 337–389. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1952) Interaction of psychological and sociological factors in political behavior, American Political Science Review 46: 44–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1950761.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1954) Psychoanalysis and the unity of science, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 80(4): 271–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/20023659.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1996a) Psychoanalyse und Persönlichkeitsforschung, in: Dietmar Paier (Ed.) Else Frenkel-Brunswik. Studien zur autoritären Persönlichkeit, 73–90. Graz; Wien: Nausner & Nausner.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1996b) Eine Studie über Vorurteile bei Kindern, in: Dietmar Paier (Ed.) Else Frenkel-Brunswik. Studien zur autoritären Persönlichkeit, 165–178. Graz; Wien: Nausner & Nausner.
Frenkel-Brunswik Else (1996c) Das Zusammenspiel psychologischer und soziologischer Faktoren im politischen Verhalten, in: Dietmar Paier (Ed.) Else Frenkel-Brunswik. Studien zur autoritären Persönlichkeit, 232–253. Graz; Wien: Nausner & Nausner.
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else (1996d) Psychoanalyse und Einheitswissenschaft, in: Dietmar Paier (Ed.) Else Frenkel-Brunswik. Studien zur autoritären Persönlichkeit, 91–147. Graz; Wien: Nausner & Nausner.
Freyhold von, Michaela (1971) Autoritarismus und politische Apathie. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
Fromm, Erich (1936) Sozialpsychologischer Teil, in: Max Horkheimer et al. (Eds.) Studien über Autorität und Familie: Forschungsberichte aus dem Institut für Sozialforschung, Schriften des Instituts für Sozialforschung, Band 5, 77–135. Paris: Alcan.
Funke, Friedrich (2005) The Dimensionality of Right-Wing Authoritarianism: lessons from the Dilemma between Theory and Measurement, Political Psychology 26(2): 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x.
Goldberger, Arthur S. (1971) Econometrics and Psychometrics: A Survey of Communalities, Psychometrika 36(2): 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291392.
Graff, Jörg, and Peter Schmidt (1982) A general model of decomposition of effects, in: Karl G. Jöreskog and Herman Wold (Eds.) Systems under indirect Observation: Causality Structure Prediction, 131–148. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Grünbaum, Adolf (1988) Die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse: Eine philosophische Kritik. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Heintz, Peter (1957) Zur Problematik der autoritären Persönlichkeit, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 9: 28–49.
Heitmeyer, Wilhelm (2018) Autoritäre Versuchungen, Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Heller, Ayline, Oliver Decker, Björne Schmalbach, Manfred Beutel, Jörg M. Fegert, Elmar Brähler, and Markus Zenger (2020) Detecting Authoritarianism efficiently: Psychometric Properties of the Screening Instrument Authoritarianism – Ultra Short(A-US) in a German representative Sample, Frontiers in Psychology 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.533863.
Heller, Ayline, Oliver Decker, Vera Clemens, Jörg M. Fegert, Scarlett Heiner, Elmar Brähler, and Peter Schmidt (2022) Changes in the authoritarianism during the COVID 19 pandemic: Are latent means comparable and equadl across East and West Germany, gender, age and education, Fron-tiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941466.
Hempel, Carl G., and Paul Oppenheim (1936) Der Typusbegriff im Lichte der neuen Logik. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff.
Hempel, Carl G., and Paul Oppenheim (1948) Studies in the Logic of Explanation Philosophy of science 15(2): 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/286983.
Hempel, Carl G. (1952) Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hempel, Carl G. (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.
Hempel, Carl G. (1973) The meaning of theoretical terms: a critique of the standard empiricist construal, in: Grigore Moisil, and Athanase Joja (Eds.) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, Amsterdam, 367–378. London; New York: Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70372-6.
Heyder, Aribert, Eldad Davidov, and Peter Schmidt (2012) ‘Ten years after’: authoritarianism and ethnocentrism in Germany, 1996 and 2006, in: Samuel Salzborn, Eldad Davidov, and Jost Reinecke (Eds.) Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences, 175–183. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18898-0_22.
Heyder, Aribert, and Peter Schmidt (2000) Autoritäre Einstellung und Ethnozentrismus: Welchen Einfluß hat die Schulbildung?, in: Susanne Rippl, Christian Seipel, and Angela Kindervater (Eds.) Autoritarismus: Kontroversen und Ansätze der aktuellen Autoritarismusforschung, 119–143. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91369-2_6.
Heyder, Aribert, and Peter Schmidt (2003) Authoritarianism and Ethnocentrism in East and West Germany: Does the System Matter?, in: Richard Alba, Peter Schmidt, and Martina Wasmer (Eds.) Germans or foreigners? Attitudes toward ethnic minorities in post-reunification Germany, 187–209. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230608825_9.
Hopf, Christel (1987) Zur Aktualität der Untersuchungen zur autoritären Persönlichkeit Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie 7: 162–177.
Hopf, Christel (1992) Eltern Idealisierung und Autoritarismus. Kritische Überlegungen zu einigen sozialpsychologischen Annahmen Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungs-soziologie 12: 52–65.
Hopf, Christel (1997) Über Else Frenkel-Brunswiks „Studien zur autoritären Persönlichkeit“. Rezen-sion, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 49: 827–828.
Hopf, Christel (2000) Familie und Autoritarismus- zur politischen Bedeutung sozialer Erfahrungen in der Familie, in: Susanne Rippl, Christian Seipel, and Angela Kindervater (Eds.) Autoritaris¬mus: Kontroversen und Ansätze der aktuellen Autoritarismusforschung, 33–52. Opladen: Leske und Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91369-2_2.
Hopf, Christel (2015) Schriften zu Methodologie und Methoden qualitativer Sozialforschung. Edited by Wulf Hopf and Udo Kuckartz. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Horkheimer, Max (1937) Traditionelle und kritische Theorie Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6(2): 245–294. https://doi.org/10.5840/zfs19376265.
Jay, Martin (1973) Dialektische Phantasie: Die Geschichte der Frankfurter Schule und des Instituts für Sozialforschung 1923–1950. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Jöreskog, Karl G. (1973) A general method for estimation a linear structural equation system, in: Arthur S. Goldberger, and Otis D. Duncan (Eds.) Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, 85–112. New York: Academic Press.
Jost, John T., Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, and Frank J. Sulloway (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition, Psychological Bulletin 129(3): 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/
-2909.129.3.339.
Kagitcibasi, Çiğdem (1970) Social Norms and Authoritarianism: A Turkish- American Comparison, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16(3): 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/
h0030053.
Keuth, Herbert (1993) Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung: zur Kritik der kritischen Theorie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Lakatos, Imre (1970) Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs, in: Imre Lakatos and Allan Musgrave (Eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, 170–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lederer, Gerda, and Angela Kindervater (1995) Wandel des Autoritarismus unter Jugendlichen in den USA, in: Gerda Lederer and Peter Schmidt (Eds) Autoritarismus und Gesellschaft: Trenda-nalysen und vergleichende Jugenduntersuchungen von 1945–1993, 86–101. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91401-9_5.
Lederer, Gerda, and Peter Schmidt (Eds.) (1995) Autoritarismus und Gesellschaft. Trendanalysen und vergleichende Jugenduntersuchungen von 1945–1993. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Lederer, Gerda (1982) Trends in authoritarianism: A study of adolescents in West Germany and the United States since 1945 Journal of cross-cultural psychology 13(2): 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002182013003002.
Lederer, Gerda (1983) Jugend und Autorität. Über den Einstellungswandel zum Autoritarismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den USA. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Levinson, Daniel J. (1950a) The Study of Anti-Semitic Ideology, in: Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sandford, The Authoritarian Personality, 57–101. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Levinson, Daniel J. (1950b) The Study of Ethnocentric Ideology, in: Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sandford, The Authoritarian Personality, 102–150. New York: Harper and Brothers.
MacCorquodale, Kenneth, and Paul E. Meehl (1948) On a Distinction between hypothetical Constructs and intervening Variables, Psychological Review 55(2): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056029.
McArdle, John J. (2005) The Development of the RAM Rules for Latent Variable Structural Equation Modeling, in: Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, and John J. McArdle (Eds.) Contemporary Psychomet-rics: A Festschrift for Roderick P. Mc Donald, 225–273. Mayhew: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Maraun, Michael D., and Stephanie M. Gabriel (2013) Illegitimate concept equating in the partial fusion of construct validation theory and latent variable modeling, New Ideas in Psychology 31(1): 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.006.
Meloen, Jos D. (1993) The F Scale as a Predictor of Fascism: An Overview of 40 Years of Authoritarianism Research, in: William F. Stone, Gerda Lederer, and Richard Christie (Eds.) Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality Today, 47–69. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7_3.
Muthen, Bengt O. (2002) Beyond SEM: General Latent Variable Modeling, Behaviormetrika 29(1): 81–117. https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.29.81.
Neurath, Otto, Rudolf Carnap, and Charles W. Morris (1938) Foundations of the Unity of Science. Toward an International Encyclopedia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, Otto (1940) Modern Man in the Making Philosophy of Science 7(1): 133–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/286617.
Neurath, Otto (1954) Foundations of the Social Sciences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, Otto (1983) The unity of science as a task, Philosophical Papers (1913–1946). Edited by Robert Sonné Cohen and Marie Neurath. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6995-7.
Oesterreich, Detlef (1993) Autoritäre Persönlichkeit und Gesellschaftsordnung: Der Stellenwert psychischer Faktoren für politische Einstellungen – eine empirische Untersuchung von Jugend-lichen in Ost und West. Weinheim: Juventa.
Paier, Dietmar (1996) Einleitung, in: Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Studien zur autoritären Persönlich¬keit. Edited by Dietmar Paier, 7–70. Graz; Wien: Nausner & Nausner.
Pettigrew, Thomas F. (2016) In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and intergroup contact, Annual Review of Psychology 67: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/
annurev-psych-122414-033327.
Pettigrew, Thomas F. (2021) Contextualizing Social Psychology. Washington: APA.
Popper, Karl (1965) The Logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Reich, Wilhelm (1933) Massenpsychologie des Faschismus: Zur Sexualökonomie der politischen Reaktion und zur proletarischen Sexualpolitik. Kopenhagen: Verlag für Sexualpolitik.
Rindskopf, Daniel (1984) Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints linear structural models, Psychometrika 49: 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294204.
Roghmann, Klaus (1966) Dogmatismus und Autoritarismus. Kritik der theoretischen Ansätze und Ergebnisse westdeutscher Untersuchungen. Meisenheim am Glahn: Anton Hain.
Rokeach, Milton W. (1954) The Open and Closed Mind: Investigations Into the Nature of Belief Systems and Personality Systems. New York: Basic Books.
Rotter, Julian B. (1954) Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.1037/10788-000.
Rotter, Juliane B. (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological monographs: General and applied 80(1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.
Rippl, Susanne, Christian Seipel, and Gerda Lederer (1995) Wandel des Autoritarismus bei Jugendlichen in Westdeutschland: 1945–1991, in: Gerda Lederer and Peter Schmidt (Eds.) Auto-ritarismus und Gesellschaft, 102–135. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91401-9_6.
Rippl, Susanne, and Christian Seipel (2000) Autoritarismus. Kontroversen und Ansätze der aktu-ellen Autoritarismusforschung, Wiesbaden: Springer.
Samelson, Franz (1986): Authoritarianism from Berlin to Berkeley: On Social Psychology and History, Journal of Social Issues 42(1): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00216.x.
Sanford, R. Nevitt, Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, and Daniel J. Levinson (1950) The Measurement of implicit antidemocratic trends, in: Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford, The Authoritarian Personality, 222–279. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Sanford, R. Nevitt (1986) A Personal Account of the Study of Authoritarianism: Comment on Samuelson, Journal of Social Issues 42: 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00217.x.
Scheepers, Peer, Albert Felling, and Jan Peters (1990) Social Conditions. Authoritarianism and ethnocentrism: a theoretical model of the early Frankfurt School updated and tested, European Sociological Review 6(1): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036543.
Schmidt, Peter, and Jörg Graff (1975) Kausalmodelle mit theoretischen Konstrukten und nicht-rekursiven Beziehungen, in: Rolf Ziegler (Ed.) Die Anwendung simultaner Gleichungssysteme auf den Statuszuweisungsprozess, 8–58. Kiel: Institut für Soziologie.
Schmidt, Peter (1977) Zur praktischen Anwendung von Theorien, Grundlagenprobleme und Anwendung auf die Hochschuldidaktik. Unveröffentlichte Dissertationsschrift, Mannheim: Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften.
Schmidt, Peter (1984) Autoritarismus, Entfremdung und psychosomatische Krebsforschung: Ex-plikation der drei Forschungsprogramme durch eine allgemeine Theorie und empirischer Test mittels Strukturgleichungsmodellen. Unveröffentlichte Habilitationsschrift, Gießen: Universität Gießen.
Seipel, Christian, Susanne Rippl, and Gera Lederer (1995) Trendanalysen und internationaler Ver-gleich des Autoritarismus, in: Gerda Lederer and Peter Schmidt (Eds) Autoritarismus und Gesellschaft, 59–85. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91401-9_4.
Seymons, John, Olga Pombo, and Juan Michael Torres (Eds.) (2011) Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science. Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4.
Sneed Joseph D. (1979) The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9522-2.
Stadler, Friedrich (2015) The Vienna Circle: Studies in the origin, development and influence of logical positivism. Heidelberg; New York: Springer.
Stellmacher, Jost, and Thomas Petzel (2005) Authoritarianism as a group phenomenon, Political Psychology 26(2): 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00417.x.
Stenner, Karen (2010) The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, William F., Gerda Lederer, and Richard Christie (Eds.) (1993) Strength and Weakness: The Authoritarian Personality today. New York. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9180-7.
Sumner, William Graham (1906) Folkways: A Study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores and morals. Boston: Ginn and Company. https://doi.org/10.2307/
Tuomela, Raimo (1973) Theoretical concepts. Vienna; New York: Springer.
Westmeyer, Hans (1992) The structuralist program in psychology: Foundations and applications. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Wiggershaus, Rolf (2010) Die Frankfurter Schule. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
Wilson, Glenn D. (1973) The Psychology of Conservativism. New York: Academic Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Schmidt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC-BY-NC-ND
