Scoping review of patients’ experiences and use of remote consultation for multiple long-term conditions in UK primary care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/qhc.157540Keywords:
digital exclusion, health equity, multiple-long-term-conditions, primary care, remote consultationAbstract
Background: Digital exclusion and Multiple Long-Term Conditions have many risk factors in common. The impact of remote consultation, in primary care on the experience of patients living with Multiple Long-Term Conditions is poorly understood. Aim: To collate and review patients’ experiences and use of remote consultation in UK General Practice for Multiple Long-Term Conditions in relation to: a) Accessibility, b) Continuity of care, and c) Impact on patient journey. Methods: Scoping review was conducted with JBI methodology, using PRISMA-ScR statement. Data analysis was conducted using narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 8,902 abstracts were screened and 365 full texts were reviewed. This resulted in 16 included articles. The themes choice, privacy and communication quality were identified during analysis. Discussion: Majority of studies examined access, demonstrating higher need for access for people with Multiple Long-Term Conditions. Most patients would choose to see their General Practitioner (GP) face-to-face. Avoiding contagion (COVID-19), or upholding continuity were the only contexts where remote GP consultation for Multiple Long-Term Conditions was found to be acceptable to patients. Conclusion: Further research is warranted, particularly into how context and type of remote GP consultation affect the quality of communication and subsequently patient journey and outcomes.
References
Abel, G., Atherton, H., Sussex, J., Akter, N., Aminu, A. Q., Bak, W., Bryce, C., Clark, C. E., Cockcroft, E., Evans, H., Gkousis, E., Jenkins, G., Jenkinson, C., Khan, N., Lambert, J., Leach, B., Marriott, C., Newbould, J., Parkinson, S., … Campbell, J. L. (2024). Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study. Health and Social Care Delivery Research, 12(32), 1–197. https://doi.org/10.3310/JKYT5803
Atherton, H., Brant, H., Ziebland, S., Bikker, A., Campbell, J., Gibson, A., McKinstry, B., Porqueddu, T., & Salisbury, C. (2018a). Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study. British Journal of General Practice, 68(669), e293–e300. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP18X694853
Atherton, H., Brant, H., Ziebland, S., Bikker, A., Campbell, J., Gibson, A., McKinstry, B., Porqueddu, T., & Salisbury, C. (2018b). The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(20), 1–200. https://doi.org/10.3310/HSDR06200
Atherton, H., Eccles, A., Poltawski, L., Dale, J., Campbell, J., & Abel, G. (2024). Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26(1), e51931. https://doi.org/10.2196/51931
Ball, S. L., Newbould, J., Corbett, J., Exley, J., Pitchforth, E., & Roland, M. (2018). Qualitative study of patient views on a ‘telephone-first’ approach in general practice in England: speaking to the GP by telephone before making face-to-face appointments. BMJ Open, 8, 26197. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026197
Cecil, E., Bottle, A., Majeed, A., & Aylin, P. (2021). Factors associated with potentially missed acute deterioration in primary care: cohort study of UK general practices. British Journal of General Practice, 71(708), e547–e554. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.0986
Chew-Graham, C., O’Toole, L., Taylor, J., & Salisbury, C. (2019). ‘Multimorbidity’: an acceptable term for patients or time for a rebrand? The British Journal of General Practice, 69(685), 372. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP19X704681
Coles, B., Zaccardi, F., Seidu, S., Gillies, C. L., Davies, M. J., Hvid, C., & Khunti, K. (2021). Rates and estimated cost of primary care consultations in people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and comorbidities: A retrospective analysis of 8.9 million consultations. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, 23(6), 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/DOM.14340
FOR EQUITY. (n.d.). Welcome to the Health Inequalities Assessment Toolkit. https://forequity.uk/hiat/
Haggerty, J. L., Reid, R. J., Freeman, G. K., Starfield, B. H., Adair, C. E., & McKendry, R. (2003). Continuity of care: A multidisciplinary review. British Medical Journal, 327(7425), 1219–1221. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.327.7425.1219
Healthwatch Haringey. (2021). Accessing GP services. https://www.healthwatch.co.uk/sites/healthwatch.co.uk/files/reports-library/20210618_Haringey_Accessing%20GP%20Services%20%281%29.pdf
Healthwatch Lewisham. (2021). Digital exclusion and access to health services. https://nds.healthwatch.co.uk/sites/default/files/reports_library/20220211_Lewisham_Digital%2520exclusion%2520and%2520access%2520to%2520health%2520services.pdf
Healthwatch Rutland. (2021). Let’s Talk… Accessing GP Practice Appointments Engagement Report. https://nds.healthwatch.co.uk/sites/default/files/reports_library/20211029_Rutland_Lets%2520Talk%2520GP%2520Practice%2520Access%2520Report%2520_0.pdf
Heath, C., Luff, P., & Sanchez Svensson, M. (2003). Technology and medical practice. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(3), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00341
Ho, I. S. S., Azcoaga-Lorenzo, A., Akbari, A., Davies, J., Khunti, K., Kadam, U. T., Lyons, R. A., McCowan, C., Mercer, S. W., Nirantharakumar, K., Staniszewska, S., & Guthrie, B. (2022). Measuring multimorbidity in research: Delphi consensus study. BMJ Medicine, 1(1), 247. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJMED-2022-000247
Humphrey, A (2023). Remote primary healthcare in the UK: How does marginalisation shape experiences of healthcare? [PhD thesis, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine]. LSHTM Research Online. https://doi.org/10.17037/PUBS.04671754
Johnston, M. C., Crilly, M., Black, C., Prescott, G. J., & Mercer, S. W. (2019). Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews. European Journal of Public Health, 29(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky098
McFarland, S., Coufopolous, A., & Lycett, D. (2021). The effect of telehealth versus usual care for home-care patients with long-term conditions: A systematic review, meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 27(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19862956
Newhouse, N., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Codagnone, C., & Atherton, H. (2015). Patient Use of Email for Health Care Communication Purposes Across 14 European Countries: An Analysis of Users According to Demographic and Health-Related Factors. J Med Internet Res, 17(3), e58. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3700
Nha Hong, Q., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). MIXED METHODS APPRAISAL TOOL (MMAT) VERSION 2018 User guide. McGill. http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT__criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf
NHS England. (2016). GENERAL PRACTICE FORWARD VIEW. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gpfv.pdf
NHS England. (2019). Securing Excellence in Primary Care (GP) Digital Services : The Primary Care (GP) Digital Services Operating Model 2019-21. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/gp-it-operating-model-v4-sept-2019.pdf
NIHR. (n.d.). Multiple long-term conditions research. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/about-us/what-we-do/multiple-long-term-conditions
NIHR. (2021). Multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity): making sense of the evidence. https://doi.org/10.3310/COLLECTION_45881
Norberg, B. L., Austad, B., Kristiansen, E., Zanaboni, P., & Getz, L. O. (2024). The Impact and Wider Implications of Remote Consultations for General Practice in Norway: Qualitative Study Among Norwegian Contract General Practitioners. JMIR Formative Research, 8, e63068. https://doi.org/10.2196/63068
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-016-0384-4
Pedersen, K. M., Andersen, J. S., & Snødergaard, J. (2012). General Practice and Primary Health Care in Denmark. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 25(Suppl 1), S34–S38. https://doi.org/10.3122/JABFM.2012.02.110216
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2021). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 19(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277
Rai, H. K., Barroso, A. C., Yates, L., Schneider, J., & Orrell, M. (2020). Involvement of People With Dementia in the Development of Technology-Based Interventions: Narrative Synthesis Review and Best Practice Guidelines. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e17531. https://doi.org/10.2196/17531
Rodgers, M., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Roberts, H., Britten, N., & Popay, J. (2009). Testing Methodological Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews: Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Smoke Alarm Ownership and Function. Evaluation, 15(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008097871
Rosen, R., Wieringa, S., Greenhalgh, T., Leone, C., Rybczynska-Bunt, S., Hughes, G., Moore, L., Shaw, S. E., Wherton, J., & Byng, R. (2022). Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-COVID-19 pandemic qualitative research. BJGP Open, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0204
Salisbury, C., Procter, S., Stewart, K., Bowen, L., Purdy, S., Ridd, M., Valderas, J., Blakeman, T., & Reeves, D. (2013). The content of general practice consultations: Cross-sectional study based on video recordings. British Journal of General Practice, 63(616), e751–e759. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X674431
Shorthose, M. F., Carter, B., Laidlaw, J., Watts, N., Wensley, S., Srivastava, S., Joughin, A., Thorman, E., Mitchell, C., Evans, R., & Braude, P. (2024). A multicentre cross-sectional observational study to determine the effect of living with frailty on digital exclusion from video consultations: (Access-VIGIL). Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 25(4), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAMDA.2023.08.028
Soley-Bori, M., Bisquera, A., Ashworth, M., Wang, Y., Durbaba, S., Dodhia, H., & Fox-Rushb, J. (2022). Identifying multimorbidity clusters with the highest primary care use: 15 years of evidence from a multi-ethnic metropolitan population. British Journal of General Practice, 72(716), e190–e198. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0325
Sweeney, K. D., Donaghy, E., Henderson, D., Huang, H., Wang, H. H. X., Thompson, A., Guthrie, B., & Mercer, S. W. (2024). Patients’ experiences of GP consultations following the introduction of the new GP contract in Scotland: a cross-sectional survey. British Journal of General Practice, 74(739), e63–e70. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0239
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Waller, E. (2018, 20 March). OUTCOME OF 2018/19 GMS CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS [Letter to Directors of Commissioning, Regional heads of Primary Care, Heads of Primary Care, and CCG Clinical Leads and Accountable Officers]. NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/gp-contract-18-19-letter-to-service.pdf
Wang, J., Spencer, A., Hulme, C., Corbett, A., Khan, Z., Vasconcelos Da Silva, M., O’Dwyer, S., Wright, N., Testad, I., Ballard, C., Creese, B., & Smith, R. (2021). Healthcare utilisation and physical activities for older adults with comorbidities in the UK during COVID-19. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(5), e2365-e2373. https://doi.org/10.1111/HSC.13675
Westphaln, K. K., Regoeczi, W., Masotya, M., Vazquez-Westphaln, B., Lounsbury, K., McDavid, L., Lee, H. N., Johnson, J., & Ronis, S. D. (2021). From Arksey and O’Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology. MethodsX, 8, 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEX.2021.101375
Zaninotto, P., Gessa, G. Di, & Steel, N. (2020). The experience of older people with multimorbidity during the COVID-19 pandemic. HEALTH | ELSA, 1-10. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10111115/1/Health%20ELSA%20Covid19.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr Anna Evans, Dr Katherine Knighting, Prof Rowan Pritchard Jones, Prof Helen Atherton, Ms Patricia Jamal, Mr Alan Griffiths, Miss Eleni Liami, Prof Greg Irving
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles submitted to Qualitative Health Communication should not be submitted to or published in other journals.
Articles published in Qualitative Health Communication may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.
For all publications published in the first four issues, i.e. 1(1), 1(2), 2(1) and 3(1), copyright is shared between the author and QHC. For all future publications, the author is the sole copyright holder.
