Communicating knowledge and embodied experiences of personal menstrual cup use through YouTube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/qhc.v2i1.133038Keywords:
Communication, credibility, menstrual cup, menstruation, personal experiences, stigma, YouTubeAbstract
Background: Despite being a normal part of life for many, menstruation is often stigmatized resulting in reduced knowledge of reusable products such as menstrual cups. YouTube videos can raise awareness of menstrual cups and challenge stigma, but little is known about the content creators or what content is communicated in the videos. Aim: Firstly, to examine vlogger characteristics and the content of videos sharing personal experiences of cup use. Secondly, to evaluate the potential of these videos as a way of communicating about menstrual health. Methods: A content analysis of the 100 most popular menstrual cup videos on YouTube followed by a qualitative thematic analysis of 50 videos containing personal experiences. Results: The content of the videos was captured in four themes: embodied knowledge; technology enabled intimacies; persuasive narratives and a collective sense of community. Discussion: Vloggers communicated knowledge and embodied experiences of personal cup use. This represents a step towards destigmatizing menstruation and menstruants’ bodies, but issues around the complexities of vloggers’ motivations and the situatedness of vloggers remain. Conclusions: Given the paucity of information on menstruation and reusable menstrual products, YouTube videos provide a potentially valuable resource for health communication and education especially for younger menstruants.
References
Ajayi, K. V., Harvey, I. S., Panjwani, S., Uwak, I., Garney, W., & Page, R. L. (2021). Lived experiences of pregnant and new mothers during COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative analysis of YouTube birth stories. medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.28.20248958
Andreasen, L. U. (2020). Menstruation Mediated: Monstrous Emergences of Menstruation and Menstruators on YouTube. In Bobel, C. Winkler, I.T., Fahs, B., Hasson, K. A., Kissling, E. A., Roberts T.-A. (Eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies, (pp. 901-914). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7
Andreassen, R, Petersen, M. N., Harrison, K., & Raun T. (Eds.), (2017). Mediated Intimacies: Connectivities, Relationalities and Proximities. London: Routledge.
Arenas-Gallo, C., Ramírez-Rocha, G., González-Hakspiel, L., Merlano-Alcendra, C., Palomino-Suárez, D., & Rueda-Espinel, S. (2020). Acceptability and safety of the menstrual cup: A systematic review of the literature. Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 71(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3425
Bobel, C., & Fahs, B. (2020). From bloodless respectability to radical menstrual embodiment: Shifting menstrual politics from private to public. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 45(4), 955-983.
Bobel, C, (2020). Introduction: Menstruation as Lens—Menstruation as Opportunity. In Bobel, C. Winkler, I. T., Fahs, B., Hasson, K. A., Kissling, E. A., Roberts T.-A. (eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies. (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7.
Bruce, V. (1996). The role of the face in communication: Implications for videophone design. Interacting with Computers 8(2):166–176.https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(96)01026-0
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Digital media and society series. Cambridge: Polity. ¨
Camm, C. F., Sunderland, N., & Camm, A. J. (2013). A quality assessment of cardiac auscultation material on YouTube. Clinical cardiology 36(2): 77–81. https://doi:10.1002/clc.22080
Chrisler, J. C., Gorman, J. A., & Streckfuss, L. (2014). Self-silencing, perfectionism, dualistic discourse, loss of control, and the experience of premenstrual syndrome. Women’s Reproductive Health, 1, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2014.966597
Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B., & Underwood, L. (2000). Social relationships and health. In: Cohen S, Underwood, L., Gottlieb, B., (Eds.), Measuring and Intervening in Social Support (pp. 3–25). Oxford University Press; New York. ISBN 0-19-512670-X Edited volume
Devendorf, A., Bender, A., & Rottenberg, J. (2020). Depression presentations, stigma, and mental health literacy: A critical review and YouTube content analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 78, 101843.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101843
Faust, M. (2020). Menstruation Regulation: A Feminist Critique of Menstrual Product Brands on Instagram. Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 576. https://dc.etsu.edu/honors/576
Frohlich, D.O. & Zmyslinski-Seelig, A. (2012). The presence of social support messages on YouTube videos about inflammatory bowel disease and ostomies. Health communication 27(5), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.606524
Grose, R. G., & Grabe, S. (2014). Sociocultural attitudes surrounding menstruation and alternative menstrual products: The explanatory role of self-objectification. Health Care for Women International, 35(6), 677-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.888721
Hohm, C. & Snyder, J. (2015). ‘It Was the Best Decision of My Life’: a thematic content analysis of former medical tourists’ patient testimonials. BMC medical ethics 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-16-8
Howard, C., Rose, C. L., Trouton, K., Stamm, H., Marentette, D., Kirkpatrick, N., ... & Paget, J. (2011). FLOW (finding lasting options for women): multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing tampons with menstrual cups. Canadian Family Physician, 57(6), e208-e215. PMID: 21673197; PMCID: PMC3114692.
Huh, J., Liu, L. S., Neogi, T., Inkpen, K., & Pratt, W. (2014). Health vlogs as social support for chronic illness management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 21(4), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2630067
Isika, N., Mendoza, A., & Bosua, R. (2019). Because people can see me: Appropriation of YouTube for chronic illness management. Research Papers, 13. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/13
Jackson, T. E., & Falmagne, R. J. (2013). Women wearing white: Discourses of menstruation and the experience of menarche. Feminism & Psychology, 23, 379–398. https://doi:10.1177/0959353512473812
Kang, S., Ha, J. S., & Velasco, T. (2017). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on YouTube: framing, anchoring, and objectification in social media. Community mental health journal, 53(4), 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-0015-5
Kaya, Y., Kaya, C., & Karaca, P. (2019). Evaluation of the Content of YouTube Videos about Vaginismus. Int J Womens Health Wellness, 5(109), 2474-1353. https://doi: 10.23937/2474-1353/1510109
Lamont, J. M, Wagner, K. M., & Incorvati, C. G. (2019). The Relationship of Self-Objectification and Body Shame to Attitudes Toward and Willingness to Use Reusable Menstrual Products. Women's Reproductive Health, 6(1), 1-16, https://doi/10.1080/23293691.2018.1556428
Liu, L. S., Huh, J., Neogi, T., Inkpen, K., & Pratt, W. (2013, April). Health vlogger-viewer interaction in chronic illness management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470663
Malefyt, T. D. W., & McCabe, M. (2016). Women's bodies, menstruation and marketing “protection:” interpreting a paradox of gendered discourses in consumer practices and advertising campaigns. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(6), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1095741
Manley, H., Hunt, J. A., Santos, L., & Breedon, P. (2021). Comparison between menstrual cups: first step to categorization and improved safety. Women's Health, 17, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745506521105855
Mathew, R. R. (2018). The crimson journey from taboo to etiquette. Language In India, 18(3), 398–406. Retrieved from http://www.languageinindia.com/march2018/rosemariacrimsonjourney1.pdf
Mazanderani, F., O’Neill, B., & Powell, J. (2013). “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy. Patient education and counseling, 93(3), 420-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.006
McNeill, A., & Sillence, E. (2018). Motivations and stake management in producing YouTube “bro-science” videos for baldness treatment. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 14(2) 97-113. https://doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2018.10012584
Milne, J. M., & Barnack-Tavlaris, J. L. (2019). A Comparison of the Menstrual Cup and the Intrauterine Device: Attitudes and Future Intentions. Women's Reproductive Health, 6(4), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2019.1653576
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Marsch, L. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2016). The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 25(2), 113-122.https://doi:10.1017/S2045796015001067
Naslund, J. A., Grande, S. W., Aschbrenner, K. A., & Elwyn, G. (2014). Naturally occurring peer support through social media: the experiences of individuals with severe mental illness using YouTube. PLOS one, 9(10), e110171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110171
Nguyen, B. T., & Allen, A. J. (2018). Social media and the intrauterine device: a YouTube content analysis. BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 44(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-101799
Peberdy, E., Jones, A., & Green, D. (2019). A study into public awareness of the environmental impact of menstrual products and product choice. Sustainability, 11(2), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020473
Pfeuffer, A., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., & Huh, J. (2020): The Effect of Sponsorship Disclosure in YouTube Product Reviews. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 391-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2020.1859023
Roberts, T. A. (2004). Female Trouble: The Menstrual Self-Evaluation Scale and Women’s Self-Objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00119.x
Rubinsky, V., Gunning, J. N., & Cooke-Jackson, A. (2020). “I thought I was dying:”(Un) Supportive communication surrounding early menstruation experiences. Health communication, 35(2), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1548337
Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Fishwick, L., & Harris, P. (2004). Trust and mistrust of online health sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 663-670.
Sillence, E. (2017). Having faith in the online voice: Exploring contemporary issues of trust, language and advice in the context of e-health. Linguistik Online, 87(8) 107-126.
Simes, M. R. & Berg, D. H. (2001). Surreptitious learning: Menarche and menstrual product advertisements. Health Care for Women International, 22(5), 455-469. https://doi:10.1080/073993301317094281
Singh, A. G, Singh, S., & Singh, P. P. (2012). YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call? The Journal of rheumatology, 39(5), 899–903. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.111114
Transparency Market Research (2018, May 9.). Global Tampons Market to be worth US$ 6.34 Bn by 2025. GlobeNewswire. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/05/09/1499625/0/en/Global-Tampons-Market-to-be-worth-US-6-34-Bn-by-2025-TMR.html May 09, 2018
United Nations (2019, March 5.). International Women’s Day—8 March 2019 Women’s Menstrual Health Should No Longer Be a Taboo. reliefweb. Accessed October 11th, 2022, from https://reliefweb.int/report/world/international-women-s-day-8-march-2019-women-s-menstrual-health-should-no-longer-be
Vance, K., Howe, W., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2009). Social internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatologic clinics 27(2), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2008.11.010
Van Eijk, A. M., Zulaika, G., Lenchner, M., Mason, L., Sivakami, M., Nyothach, E., … & Phillips-Howard, P. A. (2019). Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 4(8), e376-e393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30111-2
Wotanis, L. & McMillan, L. (2014). Performing Gender on YouTube: How Jenna Marbles negotiates a hostile online environment. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 912–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.882373
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles submitted to Qualitative Health Communication should not be submitted to or published in other journals.
Articles published in Qualitative Health Communication may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host.
For all publications published in the first four issues, i.e. 1(1), 1(2), 2(1) and 3(1), copyright is shared between the author and QHC. For all future publications, the author is the sole copyright holder.