The role of management accounting in the construction of the new generation leadership in family firms: An Actor- Reality perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/propracon.v6i2.25113Keywords:
Succession, actor-reality construction, management accounting practicesAbstract
Succession in family firms may determine the survival or the failure of the business itself. Management accountingliterature has added little to this issue, mainly focusing on the process of succession and change (Songini et. al, 2013;
Giovannoni et al., 2011). The present study deals with new management accounting (MA) practices that the junior
generation may introduce during the process of succession. The aim of the study is to show that the introduction of new
MA practices can contribute to construct the leadership profile of the junior generation. Drawing on the perspective of
Actor-Reality Construction, we conducted a case study at a small-sized, family firm producing solar shading systems.
We examined how the process of succession derives from the integration of four dimensions of reality: facts,
possibilities, values and communication. Such an integration is facilitated by the introduction of a new accounting
information system and cost report. The case evidence highlights that the construction of the new generation leadership
may emerge as unintended consequence of the introduction of new MA practices. From the emergent perspective of
Actor-Reality Construction, the paper investigates the role of new management accounting practices in the actor-world
relation constructing the new generation leadership.
References
Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. 2003. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York,
NY:University Press.
Barach, J. A., & Gantisky, J. B. 1995. Successful succession in family business. Family Business Review, 8, 131-155.
Birley, S. 1986. Succession in the family firm: The inheritor’s view. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3),
-43.
Boje, D. M. 2001. Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. London: Sage.
Bracci, E., & Maran, L. 2012. The role and use of management accouting systems (MAS) in family firms: a case study.
Piccola Impresa/Small Businees, 3, 129-153.
Busco, C., Riccaboni, A., & Scapens, R.W. 2006. Trust for accounting and accounting for trust. Management
Accounting Research, 17, 11-41.
Cabrera-Suàrez, K., De Saa-Pèrez, P., & Garcìa-Almeida, D. 2001. The succession process from a resource-and
knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37-46.
Cadieux, L. 2007. Succession in small and medium-sized family businesses: Toward a typology of predecessor roles
during and after instatement of the successor. Family Business Review, 20, 95-109.
Cater, J.J., III., & Justis, R.T. 2009. The development of successors from followers to leaders in small family firms: An
exploratory study. Family Business Review, 22, 109-124.
Chlosta, S., Patzelt, H., Klein, S., & Dormann, C. 2012. Parental role models and the decision to become selfemployed:
The moderating effect of personality. Small Business Economics, 38, 121-138.
Collinson, D. L. 2006. Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis of follower identities. Leadership
Quarterly, 17, 179-189.
Czarniawska, B. 1997. Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago: Chicago University
Press.
De Massis, A.D., Chua, J.H., & Chrisman, J.J. 2008. Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business
Review, 21, 183-199.
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. 2010. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity
construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 627-647.
Dyck ,B., Mauws F., Starke, A., & Mischke, G.A. (2002). Passing the baton. The importance of sequence, timing,
technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing,17, 143–162.
Dyer, W.G., 1986. Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fairhurst, G. 2001. Dualisms in leadership research. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The New Handbook of
Organizational Communication (pp. 379-439). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fairhurst, G. T. 2009. Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations, 62, 1607-1633.
Fairhurst, G.T., Grant, D. 2010. The Social Construction of Leadership: A Sailing Guide. Management
Communication Quarterly, 24(2) 171–210.
Fox, M., Nilakant, V., & Hamilton, R. T. 1996. Managing succession in family-owned businesses. International Small
Business Journal, 15(1), 15–25.
Giovannoni, E., & Maraghini, M.P. 2013. The challenger of integrated performance measurement systems. Integrating
mechanisms for integrated measures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26, 6, 978-1008.
Giovannoni, E., Maraghini, M.P., & Riccaboni, A. 2011. Transmitting Knowledge Across Generations: The Role of
Management Accounting Practices. Family Business Review, 24, 2, 126–15.
Grint, K. 2005. Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of “leadership.” Human Relations, 58, 1467-
Handler, W.C. 1990. Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next generation
family members. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 15(1), 37–51.
Hunt, J.G., Osborn, R.N., & Schuler, R.S. 1978. Relations of discretionary and nondiscretionary leadership to
performance and satisfaction in a complex organization. Human Relations, 31, 507-523.
Jakobsen, M., Johansson, I.L., & Nørreklit, H. 2011. An Actor's Approach to Management. Conceptual Framework
and Company Practices. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
Kajüter, P., Kulmala, H.I. 2005. Open-book accounting in networks: Potential achievements and reasons for failures.
Management Accounting Research, 16, 2, 179-204.
Kelly, L.M., Athanassiou, N., & Crittenden, W.F. 2000. Founder centrality and strategic behavior in family-owned firm.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27-42.
Lansberg, I. 1988. The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1(2), 119–143.
Lansberg, I. 1999. Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Lansberg, I. 2007. The tests of a prince. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 92-101.
Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L.P. 2004. Toward and integrative model of effective FOB succession.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 305-328.
Malone, S.C. 1989. Selected correlates of business continuity planning in the family business. Family Business Review,
(4), Winter, 341-353.
Mazzola, P., Marchisio, G., & Astrachan, J. 2008. Strategic planning in family business: A powerful developmental tool
for the next generation. Family Business Review, 21, 239-258.
Meindl, J.R. 1995. The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: A social constructionist approach.
Leadership Quarterly, 6, 329-341.
Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I. 2003. Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change and failure in
family. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513-53.
Mitchell, F., Nielsen, L.B., Nørreklit, A., & Nørreklit, L. 2013. Scoring strategic performance: a pragmatic
constructivist approach to strategic performance measurement. Journal of Management and Governance,
(1): 5-34.
Nor-Aziah A., & Scapens R.W., 2007. Corporatisation and Accounting Change: The Role of Accounting and
Accountants in a Malaysian Public Utility. Management Accounting Research, 18, 209–247.
Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L., & Mitchell, F. 2007. Theoretical conditions for validity in accounting performance
measurement, in Neely, A. (Ed.), Business Performance Measurement – Frameworks and Methodologies,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 179-217.
Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L. & Mitchell, F. 2010. Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice,
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 6, 733-758.
Nørreklit, L., Nørreklit, H. & Israelsen, P. 2006. Validity of management control topoi – towards a constructivist
pragmatism. Management Accounting Research, 17, 1, 42-71.
Salvato, C., & Corbetta, G. 2013. Transitional Leadership of Advisors as a Facilitator of Successors’ Leadership
Construction. Family Business Review, 26, 3, 235–255.
Salvato, C., & Moores, K. 2010. Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges.
Family Business Review, 23, 193-215.
Sardeshmukh, S.R., & Corbett, A.C. 2011. The duality of internal and external development of successors: Opportunity
recognition in family firms. Family Business Review, 24, 111-125.
Scapens, R.W. 2004, Doing case study research”. In The real life guide to accounting research, Christopher, E. and
Lee, B. (Ed). Elsevier Lrd, Oxford, UK.
Seal, W. 2012. Some proposals for impactful management control research. Qualitative Research in Accounting &
Management, 9(3): 228-244.
Shachar, R., & Eckstein, Z. (2007). Correcting for bias in retrospective data. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, 657
– 675.
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J.J., Pablo, A.L., & Chua, J.H. 2001. Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession
process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(3), 17–35.
Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. 1982. Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
, 257-273.
Songini, L., Gnan, L., & Malmi, T. 2013. The role and impact of accounting in family business. Journal of Family
Business Strategy, 4, 2, 71– 83.
Sorenson, R.L. 2000. The contribution of leadership style and practices to family and business success. Family
Business Review, 13, 183-200.
Stewart, A., Hitt, M.A. 2012. Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of
professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25, 58-86.
Uhl-Bien, M. 2006. Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The
Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676.
Venter, E., Boshoff, C., & Maas, G. (2005). The influence of successor-related factors on the succession process in
small and medium-sized family businesses. Family Business Review, 18, 283-303.
Vine, B., Holmes, J., Marra, M., Pfeifer, D., & Jackson, B. 2008. Exploring coleadership talk through interactional
sociolinguistics. Leadership, 4, 339-360.
Walsham, G. 2006. Doing interpretative research. European Journal of Information Systems, 5, 320-330.
Ward, J.L. 1987. Keeping the Family Business Healthy. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
Yin, R. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Previous and future use of the work
ProPraCon assumes the non-exclusive rights to publish and store the work of its authors, once they have consented to a publication. Since the rights to publish are non-exclusive, authors are free to re-use their work, e.g., to publish it in other media (as ProPraCon aims at publishing proceedings). Hence, it is explicitly allowed that works submitted to ProPraCon may be published in a somehow similar form in other media. Yet, submitting authors warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty.
Permissions
By submitting work to ProPraCon, the authors declare that they have permission to use any content that has not been created by them. Specifically, when using tables, figures or excerpts of more than 400 words, it is expected that the authors…
- …obtain written permission of copyright for the use in print and electronic formats of any of their text, illustrations, graphics, or other material, in their work. This includes any minor adaptations.
- …acknowledge the original source in captions and in the reference list.
