Er 'har du det' et reelt spørgsmål – og hvilken forskel gør ’det’?

En interaktionel analyse

Forfattere

  • Maria Jørgensen

Resumé

.

Referencer

AU PURE (2021) = Grammar in Everyday Life: Projektbeskrivelse. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet. https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/projects/hverdagsgrammatik--hvordan-folk-stiller-spoergsmaal-forhandler-samtaledeltagelse-og-styrer-andres-handlinger-i-dansk-hverdagsinteraktion (78fc1dcd-d0374808-88e1-8e18b26a6878).html (tjekket 30/04-21).

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth og Margret Selting (2018) Interactional Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hansen, Erik og Lars Heltoft (2011) Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

Hayano, Kaoru (2013) Question Design in Conversation. Jack Sidnell og Tanya Stivers (red.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell:415-432.

Heinemann, Trine (2009) Two answers to inapposite inquiries. Jack Sidnell (red.). Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:159-186.

Heinemann, Trine (2015 [2003]) Negation in interaction in Danish conversation. Skrifter om Samtalegrammatik 2 (12).

Heinemann, Trine (2016) From looking to seeing: Indexing delayed intelligibility of an object with the Danish change-of-state token n↑å↓:. Journal of Pragmatics 104:108-132.

Heinemann, Trine (2017) Receipting Answers That Are Counter to Expectations: The Polar Question-Answer-Nå-Sequence in Danish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50 (3):249-67.

Hepburn, Alexa og Galina B. Bolden (2013) The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. J. Sidnell og T. Stivers (red.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell:57-76.

Heritage, John (1984) A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement. J.M. Atkinson og J. Heritage (red.). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:299-345.

Heritage, John (2013) Epistemics in Conversation. J. Sidnell og T. Stivers (red.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell: 370-374.

Heritage, John og Geoffrey Raymond (2012) Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions. J.P. de Ruiter (red.). Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:179-92.

Hoey, Elliot M. og Kobin H. Kendrick (2017) Conversation Analysis. A.M. B. de Groot og P. Hagoort (red.). Research Methods in Psycholinguistics: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell

Jefferson, Gail (1981) The abominable Ne?: an exploration of post-response pursuit of response. P. Schröder og H. Steger (red.). Dialogforschung: Jahrbuch 1980 des Instituts für deutsche Sprache. Düsseldorf: Schwann:53-88.

Jefferson, Gail (1987) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. G. Button og J. Lee. (red.). Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters:86-100.

MacWhinney, Brian og Johannes Wagner (2010) Transcribing, searching and data sharing: The CLAN software and the TalkBank data repository. Gesprächsforschung 11:154-173.

Maynard, Douglas W. (2003) Bad News, Good News. Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mondada, Lorenza (2019) Conventions for multimodal transcription. https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription (tilgået 30/04-21).

Sacks, Harvey (1984) Notes on methodology. J. Heritage og J.M. Atkinson (red..). Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press:21-27.

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff og Gail Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4):696-735.

Samtalegrammatik.dk (2021) = Latter som nedtoning. https://samtalegrammatik.dk/opslag/artikel/latter-som-nedtoning/ (tilgået 30/04-21).

Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sidnell, Jack (2010) Conversation Analysis – An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Sidnell, Jack (2013) Basic Conversation Analytic Methods. J. Sidnell og T. Stivers (red.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell:77-99.

Sidnell, Jack og Tanya Stivers (2013) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Steensig, Jakob (2001) Sprog i virkeligheden: bidrag til en interaktionel lingvistik. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Steensig, Jakob (2015) Konversationsanalyse. S. Brinkmann og L. Tanggaard (red.). Kvalitative Metoder Og Tilgange – En Grundbog. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag:321-47.

Steensig, Jakob og Trine Heinemann (2013) When ’Yes’ Is Not Enough – as an Answer to a Yes/No Question. B.S. Reed og G. Raymond (red.). Units of Talk – Units of Action. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing:207-42.

Steensig, Jakob, Karen K. Brøcker, Caroline Grønkjær, Magnus G.T. Hamann, Rasmus P. Hansen, Maria Jørgensen, Mathias H. Kragelund, Nicholas H. Mikkelsen, Tina Mølgaard, Henriette F. Pedersen, Søren S. Sørensen & Emilie Tholstrup (2013) The DanTIN project – creating a platform for describing the grammar of Danish talk-in-interaction. J.H. Petersen og P.J. Henrichsen (red.). New Perspectives on Speech in Action. Proceedings of the 2nd SJUSK Conference on Contemporary Speech Habits. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur Press.

Stivers, Tanya (2008) Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1):31-57.

Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada og Jakob Steensig (2011) Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sørensen, Søren Sandager (2021) Affiliating in Second Position: Response Tokens with Rising Pitch in Danish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54 (1):101-25.

Tholstrup, Emilie (2014) ’Ej hvor fint’ – en undersøgelse af den danske interjektion ’ej.’ Skrifter om Samtalegrammatik 1 (3).

Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox og Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2015) Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Publiceret

01.09.2021

Citation/Eksport

Jørgensen, M. (2021). Er ’har du det’ et reelt spørgsmål – og hvilken forskel gør ’det’? En interaktionel analyse. Møderne Om Udforskningen Af Dansk Sprog (MUDS), (18), 337–358. Hentet fra https://tidsskrift.dk/muds/article/view/159852