Side 111
Abstract
During the last two
decades, industrial growth in Penang has been rapid. In
particular, production and employment in the
labor-intensive segments of the electronics industry
have increased tremendously due to investments by
transnational companies from the USA and Japan. In the
first decade, the demand for adequately skilled and
disciplined labor from Malaysia's rural areas was
covered without major bottlenecks. However, recent
reorganization of production in the electronics industry
and the general expansion of manufacturing production in
the area imply a more complex and uncovered demand for
skilled and flexible labor in combination with unskilled
and low paid labor. On the basis of scattered
statistical data and a series of interviews with
representatives for private capital, labor, and state
authorities in the Penang industrial complex, this paper
illuminates the nature of the labor shortages and the
forms of response by individual capital. The objective
is to assess the ability of existing labor market
institutions to deal with the labor demand and to
promote localized learning capacity. We find that a
number of informal labor institutions have
developed while the federal and local state have failed
to establish adequate regulatory mechanisms. We conclude
that the official preoccupation with the maintenance of
low wages hampers the creation of new, productivity
enhancing labor market institutions.
Keywords
Third World
industrialization, electronics industry, labor
shortages,
labor market regulation, Penang,
Malaysia.
Niels Fold,
Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen, Øster
Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K., Denmark, Tel.
+45 3532
2500, Fax +45 3532 2501, E-mail:
nf@geogr.ku.dk
Arne Wangel,
Department of Technology and Social Sciences, Technical
University of Denmark, Building 322, DK-2800 Lyngby,
Danmark, Tel. +45 4525 6011, Fax +45 4588 1291,
E-mail:
aw@its.dtu.dk
Geografisk
Tidsskrift, Danish Journal of Geography 97:111- 1997.
In a number of ways, the
Penang industrial area reflects the structure and
conjunctures of the Malaysian industrialization process:
the export oriented nature of manufacturing activities,
the presence of transnational companies, the dominance
of the electronics industries (both components and
consumer goods), and the establishment of new industrial
estates and Free Trade Zones (FTZs). Penang also
reflects the critical point, at which the Malaysian
industrialization process now stands facing several
challenges. The low-wage incentive has lost in value, as
other countries in the region have become viable
alternatives for labor-intensive production. The future
inflow of foreign, direct investments is being
questioned, as Penang is struggling to gain new
competitive ground in a climate of upward wage
pressures. Because domestic markets are too small to
provide the engine of growth, industrial restructuring
is targeted at making higher-end quality products for
export.
The labor market in Penang
reflects the success of the export-oriented
industrialization since the early 1970s as well as the
current limitations for future growth. Several other
factors are vital in the economic development during the
next decade, most importantly the policies on
redistribution among ethnic communities, the management
of the current inflationary pressures, the huge deficit
on the balance of payments, and the development of
advanced infrastructures for research and technological
development. The labor shortages, however, are
indicative of the point of crisis reached, and they shed
light on one fundamental requirement for a competitive
indigenous export base, i.e. high-level human skills and
innovative potentials.
In this article, we focus on
the labor market issue in its local Penang-context. We
start out with an introduction to the driving forces
behind the industrialization process in the Penang area,
i.e., the spectacular growth of the electronicsindustry.
Side 112
nicsindustry.Next, we map
out the conditions on the local labor market and outline
a number of different responses to the situation by
individual companies. Subsequently, some of the central
elements in the state government's new strategic plan,
which addresses the labor problems as well as their
wider context, is outlined. On the basis of our reviewon
the labor market situation in Penang and the existing
regulatory means to handle it, we finally question the
ability of the local institutions to secure the
sustainabilityof the economic dynamics in the industrial
area.
The article is based on
fieldwork carried out in Penang during June-August,
1994. Original data were collected through
semi-structured interviews with respondents from 20
small and medium sized industries located in Penang's
FTZs and industrial estates. Additional data were
provided by informants related to large-scale
transnational companies, trade unions, trade
associations and local state institutions. Primary data
in the form of official statistics and reports were
identified during the fieldwork.
The
industrialization of Penang: The role of the electronics
industry
Historically, Penang was one
of the three major ports of shipment between Europe,
India and China, the others being Melaka and Singapore.
The importance of Penang in the entrepot trade gradually
declined in the Straits Settlement period and during the
British colonial rule as overseas trade gravitated
towards the regional center in Singapore (Andaya &
Andaya, 1982). With Malaysia's Independence and the
formation of Singapore as an independent republic in
1965, commercial and administrative activities were
primarily stimulated in the area around Kuala Lumpur. In
particular, manufacturing production based on import
substitution was concentrated in this area. The
dominance of ethnic Chinese in the local Penang economy
was presumably an important cause for the relative
neglect of local economic problems by the Malaydominated
federal government.
The removal of Penang's free
port status in 1969 induced an urgency on local economic
actors to consider commercial activities other than
trade. The local state government was facing an urban
unemployment rate of about 15 % (ISIS & PDC, 1991)
as well as smoldering social unrest. As a consequence,
the state decided to embark on a laborintensive
industrialization as a measure to create job
opportunities portunitiesfor the largely unskilled labor
force. This strategy was a local variant of what came to
be the official industrialization strategy, launched in
the early 1970s as the major economic backbone of the
New Economic Policy (NEP). NEP was a policy package with
the twin objectives of eradicating poverty and
eliminating the identification of race with economic
function and status; it was promoted as the necessary
means for fulfillment of a grand nationalist project of
societal prosperity with ethnic peace (see for instance
Lim, 1983; Tan Tat Wai, 1982).
The national strategy was
based on generous fiscal incentives such as a large
number of possibilities for tax exemptions and
deductions from corporate income (for export promotion,
in-house research and development, training, etc.)
(Jesudason, 1990). Moreover, foreign companies in FTZs
could operate as wholly owned subsidiaries, and input as
well as output of production were free of duties and
excise taxes.
In 1972, following the
recommendations of a consultancy study, the state
Government of Penang established the first FTZ in
Malaysia. The FTZ, Bayan Lepas, was managed by the
Penang Development Corporation (PDC), a semi-government
agency that was established in order to plan and
implement industrial development. Bayan Lepas was later
followed by another FTZ and a number of "traditional"
industrial parks, catering for other parts of industry's
need for physical and functional infrastructure (see
fig. 1).
In the years before, the PDC
had carried out a vigorous promotion campaign to attract
foreign manufacturing capital. The semiconductor and
consumer electronics industries joined by textile and
garment industries became the prime movers in the
economic growth that followed. We shall briefly outline
the major phases in the development of the electronics
industry as this sector was and continue to be integral
to the industrial dynamics in the Penang area (for
details, see Nesadurai, 1991; Rajah Rasiah, 1991a,
1991b, 1993; Singh, 1995).
The first phase, which
covers the period up to the early 1980s, was
characterized by the labor intensive nature of the
semi-conductor production process and the demand for
cheap, unskilled female labor. Due to the economic
developmentin the existing export platforms of
US-companies (primarily the East Asian NICs and
Singapore), wages in these countries increased to a
level that reduced internationalcompetitiveness.
Moreover, all the four "tiger"countrieswere deliberately
trying to move towards higher
Side 113
Figure 1: Free
industrial zones and industrial parks established by the
PDC in the state ofPenang
Side 114
value added manufacturing
activities. As a consequence, new assembling operations
were established and existing operations were moved to
other Southeast Asian countries, primarily Malaysia.
Penang was the first state to receive the
US-transnationals, starting with National
Semiconductorin 1972. Later in the 1970s all of the
major UScompanies,and some of the transnational
electronics companiesfrom Japan and EU, established
subsidiaries in Malaysia, primarily in Penang. However,
Penang did not escape the general slump that hit
Malaysia in the early 1980s due to decreasing demand on
the world market and low prices on the main export
commodities. Further, the global recession in the
electronics industry that took place at the same time
had particularly severe effects on Penang as this
industry had gradually become the single most important
industry in terms of employment. Large numbers of
electronic-workers were terminated as companies reduced
production and started a restructuring process.
In the mid-1980s, the federal
government eased the rules for foreign manufacturing
companies in order to revive the flow of foreign
investments. This coincided with the second phase of the
electronics industry's expansion which gradually took
off during this period. As a response to increased
competition on the global market in the early and
mid-1980s, the US-semiconductor companies started to
automate production facilities in Penang - and other
parts of Malaysia. Technological development in capital
equipment and work organization, and the pool of trained
labor in the electronic enclaves of Malaysia made this
upgrading of production processes possible. The
relatively strict vertical intra-firm division of labor
was giving way to more flexible and locally related
networks between branches of transnational companies and
local suppliers. As a partial move towards more flexible
organization of production, the transnational companies,
particularly in the consumer electronics industry,
shifted some of their purchases of various types of
packaging materials, plastic components, stamped metal
parts, etc. to local suppliers. A few of these local
companies also managed to venture into export markets on
the basis of their experience with manufacturing of
customized products under specified requirements in
terms of quality and delivery time.
Moreover, in the late 1980s
the appreciation of the Yen was reflected in a massive
inflow of Japanese manufacturing investments to
Malaysia, of which a considerable share located in
Penang. The Japanese companies were followed by their
Taiwanese and South Korean sub-contractors torsand other
companies from these countries that were hard hit by the
loss of GSP-privileges at the US-market and the
appreciation of local currencies in the late 1980s. The
new tide of investments from East Asia included
producers of both components and consumer electronics.
As a result, the electronics and electrical industry in
Penang was significantly diversified and expanded about
1990. At that time the electronics and electrical
industry provided about 55% of total employment in the
PDC industrial areas while the manufacturing sector
contributed 46% of the GDP in the state of Penang (PDC,
n.d.).
The
nature of the labor shortage in Penang
In this way, the development
of Penang epitomizes the successive waves of what have
been termed global Fordism in the early 19705, followed
by new global Fordism in the early 1980s and global
Toyotaism in the second half of the 1980s (Fujita &
Hill, 1995). Roughly, these three concepts refer to the
three forms of foreign, globally-oriented investments
(primarily from the US and Japan) entering the Penang
area during the recent two decades. However, more
empirical research is needed to establish the exact kind
of work organizations being formed, as local labor
market conditions in Penang are confronted by such
production concepts. During the 19905, the growth of
manufacturing production has been increasingly hampered
by different kinds of bottlenecks on the labor market.
Large flyers outside transnational company factory gates
announcing 'walk- in interviews' for job-seekers and
recruitment campaigns in local media reflect the general
demand for labor power.
This is a new and emerging
barrier for capital accumulation in the area.
Previously, a more or less continuous supply of
unskilled, primarily female, workers from the labor
reservoir in Malaysia's rural hinterland has covered
demand. Strong pull-factors in the industrial growth
area have stimulated the migration of labor and made
strong interference by state regulation redundant.
However, the recent type of labor demand, i.e. the
combination of demand for unskilled low-wage labor and
skilled flexible workers, is difficult to meet.
There is a general lack of
transparency of the local labor market in Penang. A
recent study by the Human Resources Development Council
(HRDC, 1994) has tried to illuminatethe constraints but
inadequate statistics still blurs the
Side 115
picture of the current
problems. Only 27 per cent of the manufacturing
companies in Penang responded to the surveyon labor
shortage. The responding companies employ about half of
the total work force and they are primarily made up by
major transnational companies. Nevertheless, we use some
of the study's scattered information to illuminatethe
high flux of the industrial labor market in Penang. The
Human Resource Development Council has recently been
established by the State government. The council
combines representatives from the Association of Human
Resource Managers (FREPENCA) and the Federation of
Malaysian Manufacturers Northern Branch and officers of
the relevant authorities. The former association is
primarily constituted by transnational companies while
the latter is made up by a broader constituency of local
as well as foreign medium and large scale manufacturing
companies.
The new jobs created in Penang
are expected to amount to 32.134 during 1994-95, which
include 7.165 positions for skilled workers; the
dominant electrical/electronic sector alone opens 15.549
positions. In terms of job category, the demand for
5.206 technicians (1993) represents the largest single
group, and this particular need is expected to increase
drastically in 1995 and 1996. It is estimated that
Penang needs at least 700 engineers and 1.200
technicians per year, which equals the current total of
all universities and polytechnics in Malaysia (Dr. Kang
Ching Seng, chairman of Human Resources Development
Council, Penang, in the Star 5/12/94).
Thus, labor migration will
continue to be vital for Penang's economy. In 1993, 22.3
per cent of the total work force originated from
out-of-state. There was 10.369 foreign workers
constituting 24.3 per cent of total out-ofstate workers;
12.763 outstation workers who commute daily; and 19.622
workers from other states residing in Penang. In the
States of Northern Malaysia there is an estimated total
of 200.000 legal and illegal foreign workers making up
about 11 per cent of the current labor force.
The pressure in Penang seems
to be building up, as increased industrialization in the
mainland states has constrained the labor supply to
Penang. Exorbitant turnover rates have developed in this
process. In Penang state, the turnover reached 48 per
cent in 1992; in the Prai Industrial Estate alone the
rate touched 54.6 per cent. There is a significant
difference between general workers, who had a turnover
rate of 68.8 per cent, and skilled workers with "only"
37.7 per cent in 1993.
The frenzied labor market is
mainly caused by younger workers, who "would jump next
door for a 50 sen salary difference", as one employer
explains (The Star 29/3/95). The overall salary growth
in Penang was 9,5 per cent in 1993, rising to 10.3 per
cent in 1994. Technicians and engineers manage to
achieve about 15 per cent annual wage increase (The Star
5/1/95). However, decrease was registered in
clerical/sales, and among general workers and unskilled
The individual companies
resort to various short-term solutions, especially the
smaller companies that have most difficulties in
recruiting and retaining workers. In particular, some of
the small and medium-scale companies, which have
successfully established themselves as subcontractors to
transnational companies, are having a hard time as they
have to compete in the labor market segment of the
electronic industries. A series of interviews among
twenty small and medium-sized industries revealed a
number of different ways to deal with the labor
shortage:
- foreign labor: Own import of
foreign labor implies fixed and lower wage payments
(about 80 per cent of the local wage level with no extra
benefits). However, extra cost of accommodation and a
levy - imposed in 1992 and payable to the federal
authorities - must be added to the risk of declining
productivity. The advantage of foreign workers is the
fact that they are employed on a fixed twoyear contract;
those with legal status carry a machine-readable card
indicating their employer. Foreign labor is employed in
production areas with an unattractive working
environment, typically in old premises in which it is
impossible to install air-conditioning. For instance,
woodbased industries are manned with close to 100 per
cent foreign workers. The cumbersome and slow processing
of applications to Immigration authorities has not been
corrected, leaving the way open for "unscrupulous
middlemen or agents who charge exorbitant fees and often
leave the immigrant open to detection and exploitation"
(IMTGT, 1994, p.22).
- use of marginal groups on
the labor market: Some companies are also beginning to
request supply from the authorities taking care of the
approximately 180.000 disabled people in Malaysia.
Another stop-gap measure is to employ school children
during their holidays.
- organizational changes:
Various combinations of automation,relocation and
putting out simple operations (e.g. cutting of soles) to
rural households are pursued. One companyhad chosen to
replace its old plant and invest in a fullyautomated
line in association with a foreign partner. Ten
Side 116
experienced workers were
transferred from the original operationto the relocated
new factory, which is able to supplythe entire domestic
market in Malaysia. Several companieshad a branch or was
planning to move production to rural areas in
neighboring states with lower labor cost.
- fringe benefits: Major
transnational companies manage to retain more workers
with a variety of extra benefits, facilities and a
comfortable environment in the workplace. An American
semi-conductor company has a monthly turnover of only
one per cent while a Japanese manufacturer of consumer
electronics must cope with 9-12 per cent monthly.
Although efforts to retain workers imply upward
adjustments of the basic monthly salary up to several
times in a year, small and medium industries are now
also focusing on various additional benefits such as
personal accident coverage. On the whole, some of these
companies incur higher overheads in the competition to
provide better hostels, transport or meal allowances to
attract workers. One of the SMIs had tried to copy the
kind of social activities, which the transnationals use
to retain workers. However, the badminton was no success
-Labor pinching:
Labor-pinching syndicates operate at night markets, as
they approach factory workers, especially foreigners,
with better offers (The Star 17/10/94). Pinching of
workers from other companies is a strategy not only to
secure sufficient work force, but also to avoid training
costs. Newly established companies are blamed by those
companies that have been around for a long time and
spent substantial resources on training. The start-up of
new operations creates a wave of job shifts, by which
experienced and skilled staff are drained from their
original company. The newcomers save on training, while
those who have invested in skills development must start
all over again. Labor pinching also operates at a
inter-regional level between companies in Penang and
those located in neighboring states. As an example, when
several factories in the Kamunting Industrial Estate,
Taiping, complained of being robbed of workers by Penang
factories, the chairman of FMM Northern Branch, O.K. Lee
responded that their recruitment drives are carried out
according to the "free enterprise system" (The Star
6/7/94).
The
challenge to labor market regulation
In Malaysia, federal and state
interventions concerning the general parameters of
private sector activities and capitallabor
laborrelations are pervasive and in favor of business
interests, in particular those of transnational
companies. This reflects a long-term trend of
accommodating the needs of foreign investors, i.e.,
providing the instruments to ensure the international
competitiveness of foreign capital if it chooses to
locate manufacturing activities in Malaysia's
sub-regional spaces such as Penang, Selangor, and Johore
Bahru (Singh, 1992, p. 101). Investment projects are
approved at federal level by the Malaysian Industrial
Development Authority (MIDA) but planning,
implementation, and management of the local free trade
zones and industrial estates are the responsibility of
local state authorities.
The Penang State Government
via the PDC has been very precise in adopting and
implementing this conception of a regulatory role. In
early 1990, due to the emerging structural problems for
the territorial growth complex, the state Government of
Penang took the initiative to prepare a new strategic
plan entitled "Penang: Into the 21st Century"
(Government of Penang, n.d.). The subtitle of the
official document - "A strategic plan to build a
fully-developed, post-industrial society" - signals the
similarity in content to the next grand vision of
Malaysia's political elite as formulated in the Prime
Minister's Vision 2020 (see Teh Hoe Yoke & Goh Kim
Leng, 1992; Jomo K.S., 1994).
The ambitious objective of the
state government's strategy is reflected in the number
and scope of issues that are included. We shall briefly
focus on the elements that indicate the understanding
and response of the local state towards what is
officially considered as the most serious structural
problems on the labor market in Penang (see also a
number of contributions with a similar content in Asian
Strategy & Leadership Institute, 1995).
The plan emphasizes the
attractiveness of investments with high capital and
skills intensity and with potential linkages to local
supporting industry. In the future, a more selective
approach to new manufacturing investments in the state
will be taken. The ambition is to reestablish Penang as
a regional center for trade, finance,
transportation,communication and tourism. Foreign and
local investmentsin labor intensive industries should be
directed towards the lesser industrialized neighboring
states (Perlis, Kedah and Perak) or to Sumatra/Southern
Thailand. Penang and the other Northern states in
Malaysia have recently started to institutionalize their
inter-state economic cooperation (see for instance
Euromoney (special supplement),July 1993). The new
inter-regional, cross-country
Side 117
cooperation within
manufacturing production is taking place within the
emerging 'Northern Growth Triangle' betweenIndonesia,
Malaysia and Thailand; apparently the concept of growth
triangles is very popular in East and South East Asia
(Rimmer, 1994).
By gradually developing
institutional mechanisms for the regional cooperation
schemes, highly wage sensitive transnational companies
could move parts of their production to other areas in
the triangle while maintaining their regional
headquarters and R & D facilities in the Penang
area, where the necessary facilities supposedly are of a
higher standard. More emphasis on skills and human
resource development through the establishment of formal
training institutions in the Penang area would fill up
the vacuum presently harnessing the technological
up-grading of manufacturing industry in the regional
"core": the lack of skilled, flexible workers.
It is, however, a question
whether a momentum remains, or the effects of the labor
shortage have already prohibited such transition, i.e.
whether the shortage may "force" transnational
corporations to relocate their operations to China,
Vietnam or India where wage costs are lower.
Furthermore, it is not only - as recognized by the state
government - a question of wage level. At this juncture
Penang (and Malaysia) is facing new qualitative demands
imposed on its human resources. The challenge ahead was
defined in a recent book on strategies in skills
development:
".. the country
is poised to move to a higher
level of productivity
- a level that can support
a higher wage structure
and yet be able
to maintain a competitive edge in
the global
market. This interim adjustment period is
not
an easy one and demands concerted actions
from both the public and private sectors"
(Pillai 1994, p. 1).
It is the institutions of
vocational training which will have to enable the local
labor force with the skills to adapt to technological
changes in the workplace. The employers' organizations
articulate two main complaints related to the skills
shortage.
First, they point out the lack
of coordination and possible duplication of efforts
between the four federal ministries conducting
industrial and vocational training. Secondly, they
criticize the outdated curriculum in the underequipped
and under-staffed public training institutions.
Curriculum wise, the present
education system seems to be exam-oriented in a quite
rigid sense. It does not encourage students to be
critical and creative. Thus, observers emphasize that
new curriculums will have to be designed to encourage
creative, problem-solving and multiple skills, in order
to avoid producing conformists for the workplaces.
Currently, public institutions in vocational training
fail to supply the appropriate qualifications, as they
have been established as supply driven organizations
governed by bureaucratic rules, rather than
demand-driven institutions working with and for the
private sector (Pillai 1994, xii).
The federal government plans
to encourage large private corporations to establish
technical colleges, polytechnics and skills development
centers, and to sponsor their employees as participants.
New tax incentives and a system for recognition of
certificates are scheduled. The Human Resource
Development Fund was implemented in January 1993 as a
Federal initiative to support training in the
manufacturing sector. Firms with more than 50 workers
must contribute one per cent of total wages paid; the
contributors are then eligible to claim up to 80 per
cent of costs incurred by approved training programs. So
far, the results have been modest. In particular,
smaller companies are reluctant to release personnel for
training due to the labor shortage (The Star 30/11/94).
In Penang, the industry-led Penang Skills Development
Center (PSDC) has had more than 5,000 participants in
370 short courses since it was established in 1989.
Penang Development Corporation (PDC) was instrumental in
this pooling of training resources among the major
transnational companies in Penang. However, the PSDC
only caters for the need of these companies and the
courses are of limited relevance except for companies in
a few industries.
The highly ideological content
of the official discourse on labor shortages and the
problems of increasing wage levels is revealed when
local labor organizations define their position.
According to the trade union movement, a general
improvement of wages and working conditions is needed to
motivate labor reserves to enter the labor market and to
achieve more stable employment patterns, which would be
conducive for a systematic upgrading of skills. Welfare
standards would be improved, as real purchasing power
catches up with the inflationary trend. Unions argue
that, while the economy has been growing, benefits are
unevenly distributed, and the income gap between various
groups is widening.
Side 118
Furthermore, wage
differentials between regions and the highly segmented
nature of the labor market as a whole imply that pockets
of workers continue to be exploited at low wage rates.
The unions intend to define and secure a minimum wage on
their own through collective bargaining. A minimum wage
would create a stronger incentive for transition to
capital-intensive operations, and motivate a larger part
of the labor reserve (particularly women) to seek
employment.
This, in turn, would reduce
the import of foreign labor, which only increases
extroverted dependencies in manufacturing and causes
social problems in the longer term. If short-term
solutions such as labor import develop into a long-term
trend, the risks of destroying the incentive to automate
and of locking Malaysia's production structure into
low-end, labor-intensive manufacturing are aggravated.
Dependence on low-wage foreign workers contributes to
economic inefficiency and postpones restructuring and
upgrading in certain sectors. Thus, according to this
view, policies to fix a ceiling on labor import, a
deadline for factor adjustments, and introduction of tax
incentives for relocation of selected industries should
be implemented.
Conclusion
The economic dynamics of the
Penang industrial area is heavily influenced by the
development of the manufacturing industry, particularly
the transnational companies in the electronics industry.
Literally, Penang has been a melting pot for successive
forms of internationalization of capital. The
superposition in space of different forms of global
investment waves have resulted in a complex structure of
demand for labor.
National and local means and
institutions for regulation of the labor market are not
geared to the new situation. The profound interference
by state institutions in the national industrial
development has mostly dealt with the ethnic ownership
and structural transformation of the sector, as well as
improvement of general infrastructure and financial
conditions for capital accumulation. More comprehensive
and diversified requirements concerning the
qualifications of the labor force are new challenges for
state institutions and their regulatory capacity.
Existing labor market
institutions in Penang (and Malaysia) are short of
capacity to rapidly address specific needs. In tune with
the privatization drive, persuasion and tax incentives
to motivate private sector initiatives are the basic
instruments of regulation. Accordingly, urgent problems
have to be solved ad hoc by the affected parties
themselves. The actors in capital-labor relations are
left with their own incomplete information and
fragmentary bargaining, and policy making processes of
combining individual concerns into concerted action are
hampered. The employers' frantic competition for labor
and the corresponding restless circulation of workers
among companies continue, and long-term labor
institutions do not develop. The informal labor
institutions thus created only add to the obscurity of
the movements on the labor market.
Without a suitable
institutional basis - adequate institutions for
vocational training and wage systems for productivity
enhancement - it is difficult to see how the ability to
generate and control knowledge about prevailing skills
and wages on the labor market should be created,
contained and commercially exploited in the Penang area
as part of a deliberate strategy. According to Amin
& Thrift (1995, p. 11) this process - "building
learning capability" -isof primary importance for
national and local efforts to establish competitiveness
and secure sustained and self-reinforcing
In practice, both the federal
and state governments continue to concentrate on efforts
to keep a low wage level by allowing import of foreign
labor and strictly regulate the labor relations. While
prolonging the high growth trend in the short term, a
thorough industrial restructuring is postponed. Risks
are diversified in the context of changing investment
strategies of transnational corporations and conditions
on world markets. However, particularly when considering
the limited regulatory capacity, fundamentals for
long-term industrial development are not likely to
emerge. So far Penang has failed to establish
territorially contained innovation capacity and
educational structures.
References
Amin, A.
& N. Thrift (1995): Territoriality in the Global
Political
Economy'. Nordisk Samhällsgeografisk
Tidskrift 20:
3-16.
Andaya, B. W.
and Andaya, L. Y. (1982): A History of Malaysia.
London and Basingstoke; Macmillan.
Asian
Strategy & Leadership Institute (1995): Penang into
the
21st Century. Outlook & Strategies of
Malaysia's Growth
Center towards Vision 2020.
Petaling Jaya; Pelanduk Publ.
Euromoney:
various issues.
Fujita, K.
& R.C.Hill (1995): 'Global Toyotaism and Local
Development'.
International Journal of Urban and
Regional Research
Government of
Penang (n.d.): Penang. Into the 21st Century.
HRDC (Human Resources
Development Council) (1994): Annual Labor Market Survey
1994. Manpower Monitoring Committee. Penang; Federation
of Malaysian Manufacturers Northern Branch.
IMT-GT
(1994): Human Resources/Labor. Interim report,
March
11.
ISIS &
PDC (1991): Penang Strategic Development Plan 1991-2000.
Jesudason,
J.V. (1990): Ethnicity and the Economy. The State,
Chinese Business, and Multinationals in Malaysia.
Singapore;
Oxford University Press.
Jomo K.S.
(ed.) (1994): Malaysia's Economy in the Nineties.
Petaling Jaya; Pelanduk Publications.
Lim, D. (1983): The
Political Economy of the New Economic Policy in
Malaysia1. In: D. Lim (ed.) Further Readings
on Malaysian Economic Development: 3-22. Kuala Lumpur;
Oxford University Press.
Nesadurai,
H.E.S. (1991): 'The Free Trade Zone in Penang, Ma-
laysia:
Performance and Prospects'. Southeast Asian Journal
of Social Science 19, 1-2: 103-137).
PDC (n.d.):
Statistics. Penang, Malaysia.
Pillai, P.
(1994): Industrial training in Malaysia. Challenge and
response. Kuala Lumpur; Institute of Strategic and
International
Rajah Rasiah (1991a):
'Reorganization of Production in the Semi-Conductor
Industry and Its Impact on Penang's Position in Eat
Asia'. In: Muhammad Ikmal Said & Johan Saravanamuttu
(eds.) Images of Malaysia: 203-223. Kuala Lumpur;
Persatuan Sains Social Malaysia.
Rajah Rasiah
(1991b): 'Foreign Firms in Penang's Industrial
Transformation'. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 23: 91-117.
Rajah Rasiah
(1993): 'Competition and governance: Work in
Malaysia's Textile and Garment Industries'. Journal
of Contemporary
Asia 23,1: 3-23.
Rimmer, P.J.
(1994): 'Regional Economic Integration in Pacific
Asia'. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 26:
1731-1759.
Singh, M.S. (1992):
'Malaysia's manufacturing corridor: industrial
transformation and regional development through the
internationalization of capital1. Regional
Development Dialogue 13,2: 83-103.
Singh, M.S. (1995):
'Formation of Local Skills Space Networking: the
Experience of the Electronics and Electrical Sector in
Penang'. In: B. van der Knaap & R. Le Heron (eds.)
Human Resources and Industrial Spaces: 197-226. New
York; John Wiley & Sons.
Tan Tat Wai
(1982): Income Distribution and Determination in
West Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur; Oxford University
Press.
The Hoe Yoke
& Goh Kim Leng (eds.) (1992): Malaysia's Economic
Vision. Issues and Challenges. Petaling Jaya;
Pelanduk
Publications.
The Star:
Various issues.