@article{Møller_2018, title={Løgstrups kristologi og den anden jagt på den historiske Jesus}, volume={76}, url={https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/105694}, DOI={10.7146/dtt.v76i4.105694}, abstractNote={<p>This article examines whether K.E. Løgstrup’s Christology is<br />compatible with the “implicit Christology” of Bultmann and his students.<br />In their ongoing discussion about the relationship between the<br />historical Jesus and Christ of the kerygma, Bultmann holds an extreme<br />position, refusing to credit the historical Jesus with any meaning for<br />Christian faith but the mere fact that he once lived. His implicit Christological traits are explicated in the confession, and therefore, this kind of “implicit Christology” is formed as a movement from law to gospel.<br />Against this view, Käsemann and Bornkamm wish to ascribe the historical<br />Jesus with a more pivotal meaning upon faith, because of the<br />messianic traits of his life and preaching. Løgstrup’s Christology is a<br />thoroughly human Christology, since Jesus is Christ by being the true<br />human being. Løgstrup then holds the opposite extreme position; both<br />beginning and ending with the human being Jesus of Nazareth. Therefore,<br />Løgstrup’s Christology is something quite unique and Løgtrupian.</p>}, number={4}, journal={Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift}, author={Møller, Maria Louise Odgaard}, year={2018}, month={maj}, pages={291–311} }