@article{Rosfort_2013, title={“at forstaaeliggjøre og tyde Naturens Runer”}, volume={76}, url={https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/105669}, DOI={10.7146/dtt.v76i2.105669}, abstractNote={<p>Kierkegaard’s attitude to natural science is equivocal. While<br />the published works deal with the open criticism of Hegel and his Danish<br />followers, in his journals and notebooks we find a more clandestine,<br />albeit no less intense, critique of the scientific endeavours of his day. The<br />biting sarcasm that characterises this critique has often led to the view<br />that Kierkegaard, as a Christian thinker of subjectivity, naturally has<br />to be stubbornly against scientific progress. On a closer look, though,<br />we fi nd a more complex view hidden underneath the noisy surface of<br />Kierkegaard’s vigorous rhetoric. The point of this article is to articulate<br />this more complex view against the backdrop of a historical sketch of<br />the relationship between science and religion at the time of Kierkegaard,<br />and through an interpretation of the Kierkegaard’s statements in<br />his journals and notebooks.</p>}, number={2}, journal={Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift}, author={Rosfort, René}, year={2013}, month={maj}, pages={133–149} }