@article{Ravn_2012, title={Det oversete argument}, volume={75}, url={https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/105584}, DOI={10.7146/dtt.v75i3.105584}, abstractNote={<p>The article presents American semiotician Charles Sanders<br />Peirce’s 1908 essay “The Neglected Argument for the Reality of God”<br />which has been viewed as notoriously difficult and obscure. The article<br />is primarily concerned with giving an account of the three stages<br />that constitute Peirce’s argument, as well as giving an interpretation of<br />their interrelation (a much discussed problem in Peirce scholarship).<br />Conclusively, the article reviews the relevance of the theological views<br />presented in Peirce’s argument by sketching how Peirce’s idea of God<br />draws the current discussion of the relationship between methodological<br />naturalism</p>}, number={3}, journal={Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift}, author={Ravn, Martin}, year={2012}, month={okt.}, pages={203–221} }