Danish Journal of Archaeology
https://tidsskrift.dk/dja
The Danish Journal of Archaeology is dedicated to the presentation, discussion and interpretation of the archaeological record of southern Scandinavia in its international, regional and local contextThe Editorial Board of Danish Journal of Archaeologyen-USDanish Journal of Archaeology2166-2290<p>Counting from volume 11 (2022), articles published in DJA are licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</a>. The editorial board may accept other Creative Commons licenses for individual articles, if required by funding bodies e.g. the European Research Council. With the publication of volume 11, authors retain copyright to their articles and give DJA the right to the first publication. The authors retain copyright to earlier versions of the articles, such as the submitted and the accepted manuscript.</p> <p>Articles in volume 1-8 are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to DJA. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors can upload their articles in an institutional repository as a part of a green open access policy.<br /><br />Articles in volume 9-10 are not licensed under Creative Commons. In these volumes, all rights are reserved to the authors of the articles respectively. This implies that readers can download, read, and link to the articles, but they cannot republish the articles. Authors can upload their articles in an institutional repository.</p>Middle Neolithic trackway A20 at Kastbjerg Å
https://tidsskrift.dk/dja/article/view/137091
<p>In 2015-2017, East Jutland Museum excavated a series of well-preserved prehistoric and early historic trackways at Kastbjerg Å in the Kastbjerg Å river valley (eastern Jutland, Denmark). In this article, we will present the earliest of the in situ preserved structures, the Middle Neolithic trackway A20, and the high-precision dating of this structure. Dendrochronological dating of wood sequences provides very precise ages for archaeological timbers from buildings or structures, such as bridges or ships. This is not possible, however, when the dendrochronological samples lack sapwood, if the wood sequence has too few rings to provide definite placement on the dendrochronological master curve, if the wood sequence falls outside the range of the master curves or if the species of wood is not suitable for dendrochronological analysis. Here, we date a wood sequence of an alder tree from trackway A20 using the radiocarbon wiggle-match method to 2911 ±5 BC. The function of the trackway and the significance of the Neolithic river crossing at the Kastbjerg Å site are discussed in the light of European parallels and the regional cultural context.</p>Jesper OlsenBo MadsenMarie KanstrupCarsten KorthauerLutz Klassen
Copyright (c) 2024 Jesper Olsen, Bo Madsen, Marie Kanstrup, Carsten Korthauer, Lutz Klassen
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-01-292024-01-2913111610.7146/dja.v13i1.137091Hafting of a Neolithic leister: Identification of adhesives from Lolland (Denmark)
https://tidsskrift.dk/dja/article/view/141566
<p>Birch tar has been identified as the predominant adhesive used for hafting purposes in the European Mesolithic and Neolithic. Its role in the manufacture of composite tools and weapons comprising wooden, bone and flint components attests its importance during these periods. The discovery of birch tar lumps, some bearing tooth imprints, suggests a broader range of functions beyond its adhesive properties. In this study, we present an analysis of five residues from two sites (Syltholm II and Strandholm I) that have been excavated through the Femern project, with the aim to shed light on the adhesives used in relation to their functions. Through chemical analyses, we show that birch tar constitutes the main component of two lumps and one chewed piece. We also found that birch tar served to haft a bone point within leister prongs, providing new information on its previously unknown role in composite fishing tool technology. These findings have significant implications for our understanding of the functional role and performance of birch tar in aquatic environments.</p>Tabea Joanna KochDaniel GroßBjørnar Tved MågeAimée Little
Copyright (c) 2024 Tabea Joanna Koch, Daniel Groß, Bjørnar Tved Måge, Aimée Little
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-01-192024-01-191311810.7146/dja.v13i1.141566Experiments on reconstructing and using T-shaped wooden Spades
https://tidsskrift.dk/dja/article/view/138710
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>This article summarizes an attempt at reconstructing and using T-shaped wooden spades as well as reflecting on the connection between structures and resource use around Knudmosen near Herning. However, an important limitation on this process is that very few spades are dated. The conclusion is that the spades are relatively easy to produce and well suited to digging peat.</p>Henriette LyngstrømMartin Winther OlesenLucas Overvad
Copyright (c) 2024 Henriette Lyngstrøm, Martin Winther Olesen, Lucas Overvad
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-05-292024-05-291311810.7146/dja.v13i1.138710Danmarks Not-So-Oldest Sheep
https://tidsskrift.dk/dja/article/view/145009
<p>Sheep and goats are often considered to be the oldest livestock animals in Denmark. In this contribution, we present the results of ZooMS measurements from seven ovicaprid bones from the Femern project, an excavation in the area of the former Syltholm Fjord (Lolland, Denmark). The bones were morphologically identified as sheep or goats and represented the oldest dated remains of both species in Denmark. However, the ZooMS analysis showed that more than half of the morphological identifications were incorrect. For the other samples, we refined the identifications. Hence, our study confirms that indications of sheep and goat husbandry based on bone morphology alone should be treated with caution. The probability of misidentification in our case was high, even in the case of well-preserved bones.</p>Daniel GroßSamantha PressleeUlrich SchmölckeElena A. NikulinaJessica Hendy
Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Groß, Samantha Presslee, Ulrich Schmölcke, Elena A. Nikulina, Jessica Hendy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-08-262024-08-2613111010.7146/dja.v13i1.145009