Hacking the Biomedical Discourse
Trans Digital Counterpublics and the Self-Governance of Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v39i1.155907Nøgleord:
Trans sundhed, sundhedskommunikation, kritisk diskursanalyse, diskursanalyse, trans lingvistik, RedditResumé
Institutional barriers to trans healthcare have compelled trans communities to establish peer-led digital spaces where medical knowledge is collectively produced and circulated outside traditional authority structures. This study investigates how Reddit's trans health communities exhibit counterpublic characteristics through their negotiation of medical authority via distinctive discourse practices. Using a mixed-methods approach combining Critical Discourse Analysis with computational linguistic techniques, the research analyzes 826 discussion threads from six trans subreddits collected between April 2024 and January 2025. The corpus includes medical-focused communities (r/TransDIY, r/AskMtFHRT, r/Transgender_Surgeries, r/TransfemScience; 603 threads) and comparative general trans discourse (r/asktransgender, r/transhealth; 223 threads).
The analysis reveals that medical communities practice what this study terms "engaged counterpublic" formation: strategic negotiation between biomedical appropriation and experiential authority construction (rather than a wholesale rejection of institutional knowledge). This engaged counterpublic formation distinguishes itself from oppositional counterpublics through context-dependent authority deployment.
The findings extend Fraser's counterpublic theory by documenting how marginalized communities navigate relationships with institutional knowledge systems when exclusion necessitates autonomous survival strategies. These digital counterpublics represent sites where communities not only resist medical gatekeeping but innovate knowledge production methods that challenge credential monopolies and establish distributed peer expertise networks as alternative validation systems for health knowledge.
Referencer
Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the “Counter,” in Counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10(4), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x
Ashley, F. (2019). Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(7), 480–482. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105293
Augustaitis, L., Merrill, L. A., Gamarel, K. E., & Haimson, O. L. (2021). Online Transgender Health Information Seeking: Facilitators, Barriers and Future Directions. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445091
August-Rae, B. C., Baker, J. T., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2024). “Not just rebellious, it’s revolutionary”: Do-it-yourself hormone replacement therapy as Liberatory Harm Reduction. Social Science & Medicine, 345, 116681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116681
Awkward-Rich, C. (2017). Trans, Feminism: Or, Reading like a Depressed Transsexual: Winner of the 2017 Catharine Stimpson Prize for Outstanding Feminist Scholarship. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 42(4), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1086/690914
Brouwer, D., & Asen, R. (2010). Public modalities: Rhetoric, culture, media and the shape of public life. University of Alabama Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.30297324
Carel, H., & Kidd, I. J. (2014). Epistemic injustice in healthcare: A philosophical analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17, 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9560-2
Certeau, M. de (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612
Deutsch, M. B. (2016). Evaluation of Patient-Oriented, Internet-Based Information on Gender-Affirming Hormone Treatments. LGBT Health, 3(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2015.0116
Edenfield, A., Holmes, S., & Colton, J. (2019). Queering Tactical Technical Communication: DIY HRT. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28, 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1607906
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press.
Franzke, A. S., Bechmann, A., Ess, C. M., & Zimmer, M. (Eds.) (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. AoIR (The International Association of Internet Researchers). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Horak, L. (2014). Trans on YouTube. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2815255
Katz, C. (2004). Growing Up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s Everyday Lives. University of Minnesota Press.
Kennedy, C. E., Yeh, P. T., Byrne, J., van der Merwe, L. L. A., Ferguson, L., Poteat, T., & Narasimhan, M. (2022). Self-administration of gender-affirming hormones: a systematic review of effectiveness, cost, and values and preferences of end-users and health workers. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(3), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2022.2045066
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lederer, J. (2015). Exploring the Metaphorical Models of Transgenderism. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1016809
Lupton, D. (2014). Critical Perspectives on Digital Health Technologies. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1344–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12226
Martynyuk, A. (2021). Transition Trauma Metaphor in Transgender Narrative. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.1.mar
Nicolazzo, Z. (2021). Imagining a Trans* Epistemology: What Liberation Thinks Like in Postsecondary Education. Urban Education, 56(3), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917697203
Raun, T. (2016). Out Online: Trans Self-Representation and Community Building on YouTube (1st Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315599229
Record, R. A., Silberman, W. R., Santiago, J. E., & Ham, T. (2018). I Sought It, I Reddit: Examining Health Information Engagement Behaviors among Reddit Users. Journal of Health Communication, 23(5), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1465493
Relman, A. S. (1980). The new medical-industrial complex. The New England Journal of Medicine, 303(17), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198010233031703
Rotondi, N. K., Bauer, G. R., Scanlon, K., Kaay, M., Travers, R., & Travers, A. (2013). Nonprescribed hormone use and self-performed surgeries: “do-it-yourself” transitions in transgender communities in Ontario, Canada. American Journal of Public Health, 103(10), 1830–1836. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301348
Sharon, T. (2018). When digital health meets digital capitalism, how many common goods are at stake? Big Data & Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718819032
Spade, D. (2015). Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Duke University Press.
Squires, C. R. (2002). Rethinking the Black Public Sphere: An Alternative Vocabulary for Multiple Public Spheres. Communication Theory, 12(4), 446–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
Stryker, S., Currah, P., & Moore, L. J. (2008). Introduction: Trans-, Trans, or Transgender? Women’s Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.0.0112
Tuck, E. (2009). Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
Wexler, A. (2022). Mapping the Landscape of Do-it-Yourself Medicine. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.553
Ziebland, S., & Wyke, S. (2012). Health and illness in a connected world: How might sharing experiences on the internet affect people’s health? The Milbank Quarterly, 90(2), 219–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00662.x
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2026 Emma Machado de Souza
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).
Udgivelser i Kvinder, Køn og Forskning er beskyttet under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
